Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL 2.1.3 release candiate

2017-01-20 Thread Even Rouault
On vendredi 20 janvier 2017 16:07:17 CET Jeff McKenna wrote: > Hi Even, > > I tested on Windows with VS2012. All was fine (including plugins for > Python, Java, Oracle, ECW), but the CSharp build gave the following error: > > --- > ogr\OsrPINVOKE.cs(192,10): error CS0111: Type

Re: [gdal-dev] Participating on gdal2tiles

2017-01-20 Thread Mark Johnson
You might also consider incorporating the mbtiles implementation of a fork of gdal2tiles that can be found here: https://github.com/mj10777/gdal2mbtiles Here the goal was to also offer mbtiles as the output-format - instead of a tiles-directory It also offered options to use mbtiles as a source

Re: [gdal-dev] EXC_BAD_ACCESS on 1.11 OGROpen() SQLite or GeoPackage

2017-01-20 Thread Nik Sands
Please ignore this one (below). Sorry for wasting the list's time on this one. I can now build GDAL 2.x for iOS no trouble, and I do not get the crash with GDAL 2.1.2. (After not being able to get GDAL 2.x to build for iOS last October, I gave up on it and went back to 1.11. I’ve just tried

Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL 2.1.3 release candiate

2017-01-20 Thread Jeff McKenna
Hi Even, I tested on Windows with VS2012. All was fine (including plugins for Python, Java, Oracle, ECW), but the CSharp build gave the following error: --- ogr\OsrPINVOKE.cs(192,10): error CS0111: Type 'OSGeo.OGR.OsrPINVOKE' already defines a member called'OsrPINVOKE' with the same

Re: [gdal-dev] Question about .aux.xml sidecar file handling...

2017-01-20 Thread Carl Godkin
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 7:55 AM, Even Rouault wrote: > > It seems that in ArcGIS 9.3, .aux.xml had their right at > the root of the XML tree (so not at all compatible with GDAL .aux.xml > formalism), and that in ArcGIS 10, they moved it as a GDAL PAM xml:ESRI >

Re: [gdal-dev] Participating on gdal2tiles

2017-01-20 Thread Grégory Bataille
yes indeed, that would be one of the things I'd like to try and do... A few bug fix before though and then I'll see Thanks --- Gregory Bataille On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 10:34 AM, Sean Gillies wrote: > Hi Grégory, > > On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 8:59 AM, Even Rouault

Re: [gdal-dev] Participating on gdal2tiles

2017-01-20 Thread Sean Gillies
Hi Grégory, On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 8:59 AM, Even Rouault wrote: > On vendredi 20 janvier 2017 05:45:28 CET Grégory Bataille wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > I just subscribed to this list. Due to current interest, driven by my > > > current job, I'd like to

Re: [gdal-dev] Participating on gdal2tiles

2017-01-20 Thread Grégory Bataille
youhou... :) ok, I'll see what I can do then --- Gregory Bataille On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 8:59 AM, Even Rouault wrote: > On vendredi 20 janvier 2017 05:45:28 CET Grégory Bataille wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > I just subscribed to this list. Due to current

[gdal-dev] GDAL 2.1.3 release candiate

2017-01-20 Thread Even Rouault
Hi, I have prepared a GDAL/OGR 2.1.3 release candidate. Peek up an archive among the following ones (by ascending size): http://download.osgeo.org/gdal/2.1.3/gdal-2.1.3RC1.tar.xz http://download.osgeo.org/gdal/2.1.3/gdal-2.1.3RC1.tar.gz http://download.osgeo.org/gdal/2.1.3/gdal213RC1.zip

[gdal-dev] FW: Strange results of simple polygonising

2017-01-20 Thread CABO
I have looked at the special case of a raster combining situation 3 and 4 below: 3 + 4: # # ## ## # # The polygoniser handles this fine by return a result with two separate polygons. For easier reference, I have included the WKT of the 4 + 1 situations and their results: 1:

Re: [gdal-dev] Participating on gdal2tiles

2017-01-20 Thread Even Rouault
On vendredi 20 janvier 2017 05:45:28 CET Grégory Bataille wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I just subscribed to this list. Due to current interest, driven by my > current job, I'd like to participate on gdal2tiles. > However I'm not sure how to go about it and how active the development > still is. > I,