Re: [gdal-dev] Failure to convert to Airy

2019-06-17 Thread Joaquim Manuel Freire Luís
Right. I changed the signature and removed the CPLFree() and now in GMT it also ... half works. The middle warnings are print from GMT but the other come from GDAL and are like those you suppressed in your gdaltransform commit. So, I should try to catch this type of cases where one can do the

Re: [gdal-dev] Failure to convert to Airy

2019-06-17 Thread Even Rouault
> but raise the error when I change the order of the source and target (i.e. > create the inverse mapping) Sure, as that would trigger the non existing reverse operation. > > pSrcSRS = "+proj=airy +ellps=WGS84 +units=m" > pDstSRS = "+proj=latlong +datum=WGS84" > > In this case, it even raises

Re: [gdal-dev] Failure to convert to Airy

2019-06-17 Thread Joaquim Manuel Freire Luís
I used the gdaltranslate example because I knew that it would much simpler for you to test but, as I said first, this issue was raised by a call to GDAL from GMT. Looked again into it and what happens is that the gmt_OGRCoordinateTransformation() call runs fine when pSrcSRS = "+proj=latlong

Re: [gdal-dev] Failure to convert to Airy

2019-06-17 Thread Even Rouault
On lundi 17 juin 2019 17:14:21 CEST Joaquim Manuel Freire Luís wrote: > Well, I call it via GMT but that test is in GMT for a while and it used to > pass. > > Anyway, I'll have to investigate this further because I rebuilt GDAL and now > the gdaltransform works, but when I call it from GMT is

Re: [gdal-dev] [SeasonOfDocs] Offers for GDAL documenting

2019-06-17 Thread Ivan Lucena
Talking about basics... Most of the SDK we download to build drivers comes with an INSTALL file (.md or not) and that is what people usually look for when they decide that they need to download and build a FOSS. But GDAL doesn't have that. Yes, the information is there, somewhere but it would

Re: [gdal-dev] Failure to convert to Airy

2019-06-17 Thread Joaquim Manuel Freire Luís
Well, I call it via GMT but that test is in GMT for a while and it used to pass. Anyway, I'll have to investigate this further because I rebuilt GDAL and now the gdaltransform works, but when I call it from GMT is still fails. The code is

Re: [gdal-dev] Failure to convert to Airy

2019-06-17 Thread Even Rouault
> used to work before the GDAL3+PROJ6 combo. That would be surprising: with GDAL 2.4 and PROJ < 6, you also get an error, but with a different message: $ gdalinfo --version GDAL 2.4.1, released 2019/03/15 $ echo 4.897 52.371 | \ gdaltransform -s_srs +proj=longlat -t_srs "+proj=airy

Re: [gdal-dev] Failure to convert to Airy

2019-06-17 Thread Joaquim Manuel Freire Luís
Thanks, This comes from our GMT tests and used to work before the GDAL3+PROJ6 combo. And funny that it also half works when I run it from Julia. But not from GMT. |>-Original Message- |>From: Even Rouault |>Sent: Monday, June 17, 2019 5:37 PM |>To: gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org |>Cc:

Re: [gdal-dev] Failure to convert to Airy

2019-06-17 Thread Even Rouault
On lundi 17 juin 2019 16:08:36 CEST Joaquim Manuel Freire Luís wrote: > Even > > I'm seeing this failure with the airy conversion > > echo 4.897 52.371 | gdaltransform -s_srs +proj=longlat -t_srs +proj=airy > > ERROR 1: PROJ: proj_create: Error -50: malformed pipeline > ERROR 6: Cannot find

[gdal-dev] Failure to convert to Airy

2019-06-17 Thread Joaquim Manuel Freire Luís
Even I'm seeing this failure with the airy conversion echo 4.897 52.371 | gdaltransform -s_srs +proj=longlat -t_srs +proj=airy ERROR 1: PROJ: proj_create: Error -50: malformed pipeline ERROR 6: Cannot find coordinate operations from `PROJCRS["unknown",BASEGEOGCRS["unknown",DATUM["World

Re: [gdal-dev] [SeasonOfDocs] Offers for GDAL documenting

2019-06-17 Thread Even Rouault
On lundi 17 juin 2019 08:16:30 CEST Eli Adam wrote: > On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 5:43 AM Even Rouault wrote: > > Hi, > > > > this is really great news ! Given my experience with the project, I'm > > rather far from being representative of someone less familiar with it or > > with a non- developer

Re: [gdal-dev] [SeasonOfDocs] Offers for GDAL documenting

2019-06-17 Thread Eli Adam
On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 5:43 AM Even Rouault wrote: > > Hi, > > this is really great news ! Given my experience with the project, I'm rather > far from being representative of someone less familiar with it or with a non- > developer profile, so thoughts from the broader GDAL community on what

Re: [gdal-dev] [SeasonOfDocs] Offers for GDAL documenting

2019-06-17 Thread Even Rouault
Hi, this is really great news ! Given my experience with the project, I'm rather far from being representative of someone less familiar with it or with a non- developer profile, so thoughts from the broader GDAL community on what they feel is the most missing would be welcome. One thing I've

[gdal-dev] Issue when compiling gdal v2.1.2

2019-06-17 Thread Jorge Martin
Hello, I am trying to compile the gdal 2.1.2 and I have problems with the gcc. Do you know what gcc version is necessary to compile? Cheers, Jorge ___ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev