Hi,
čt 4. 3. 2021 v 22:48 odesílatel Even Rouault
napsal:
> > [1] http://geo102.fsv.cvut.cz/~landa/tmp/data_CZ.gml.7z
>
> yes please. If you can strip it down to just a few features that can
> reproduce the issue, that's even better.
I am not sure what is the reason why GML driver behaves like
In the below example, the gml_id are not duplicated if you look
cloosely. The duplication of the OGR FID is a pure GDAL behaviour in the
way it tries to derive a FID from gml_id. So Geoserver behaves just fine
here.
Le 04/03/2021 à 23:02, jratike80 a écrit :
Hi,
It would be interesting to
Hi,
čt 4. 3. 2021 v 23:03 odesílatel jratike80
napsal:
> It would be interesting to know how you manage to generate duplicate fids
> with Geoserver but perhaps it is better to discuss about that in
> geoserver-users.
to my understanding, the duplicate FID are generated by GDAL not by
GeoServer.
Hi,
čt 4. 3. 2021 v 22:42 odesílatel Martin Landa napsal:
> > You can't probably fix this by using CopyLayer(). But if you use
> > GDALVectorTranslate() with the -unsetFid option, that should solve your
> > issue.
>
> Thanks for a hint!
```
gdal.VectorTranslate("file.gpkg", "file.gml")
```
Hi,
It would be interesting to know how you manage to generate duplicate fids
with Geoserver but perhaps it is better to discuss about that in
geoserver-users.
-Jukka Rahkonen-
Martin Landa wrote
> Hi all,
>
> I have an issue with GML generated by GeoServer. There are features
> with
Here it is [1]. Should I report it as a Github issue?
Martin
[1] http://geo102.fsv.cvut.cz/~landa/tmp/data_CZ.gml.7z
yes please. If you can strip it down to just a few features that can
reproduce the issue, that's even better.
--
http://www.spatialys.com
Dear Even,
čt 4. 3. 2021 v 22:37 odesílatel Even Rouault
napsal:
first of all, thanks for quick reply!
> You can't probably fix this by using CopyLayer(). But if you use
> GDALVectorTranslate() with the -unsetFid option, that should solve your
> issue.
Thanks for a hint!
> It would be also
Martin,
You can't probably fix this by using CopyLayer(). But if you use
GDALVectorTranslate() with the -unsetFid option, that should solve your
issue.
It would be also good that you file an issue with a minimum reproducer
file. The GML driver should be ideally be smarter in the way it
Hi all,
I have an issue with GML generated by GeoServer. There are features
with duplicated FID:
```
OGRFeature(lucas_view):36
gml_id (String) = lucas_view.fid--269ff1b9_177af2abc34_-36e6
point_id (Integer) = 45502976
nuts0 (String) = CZ
POINT (455 2976000)
OGRFeature(lucas_view):36
FWIW +1 from a non PSC member
Thomas
Le jeu. 4 mars 2021 à 17:33, Even Rouault a
écrit :
> Hi,
>
> Updating my yesterday motion with the feedback received (only second
> bullet updated with a more restricted set of drivers)
>
> Motion:
>
> - remove the vector drivers BNA, AeronavFAA, HTF,
+1 (wrong thread)
(I think we should also list the 3.5.0 milestone at
https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/milestones so packagers/community can make
adjustments in time for that date)
-jeff
On 2021-03-04 12:32 p.m., Even Rouault wrote:
Hi,
Updating my yesterday motion with the feedback
+1 KurtS
On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 8:33 AM Even Rouault
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Updating my yesterday motion with the feedback received (only second
> bullet updated with a more restricted set of drivers)
>
> Motion:
>
> - remove the vector drivers BNA, AeronavFAA, HTF, OpenAir, SEGUKOOA,
> SEGY, SUA,
+1
On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 9:33 AM Even Rouault
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Updating my yesterday motion with the feedback received (only second
> bullet updated with a more restricted set of drivers)
>
> Motion:
>
> - remove the vector drivers BNA, AeronavFAA, HTF, OpenAir, SEGUKOOA,
> SEGY, SUA, XPlane
+1
(I think we should also list the 3.5.0 milestone at
https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/milestones so packagers/community can make
adjustments in time for that date)
-jeff
On 2021-03-03 2:48 p.m., Even Rouault wrote:
Hi,
Following the discussions of past weeks, I motion to:
- remove the
+1
-Jukka Rahkonen-
Even Rouault-2 wrote
> Hi,
>
> Updating my yesterday motion with the feedback received (only second
> bullet updated with a more restricted set of drivers)
>
> Motion:
>
> - remove the vector drivers BNA, AeronavFAA, HTF, OpenAir, SEGUKOOA,
> SEGY, SUA, XPlane and
+1
On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 11:40 AM Howard Butler wrote:
>
>
> > On Mar 4, 2021, at 10:32 AM, Even Rouault
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Updating my yesterday motion with the feedback received (only second
> bullet updated with a more restricted set of drivers)
> >
> > Motion:
> >
> > - remove
> On Mar 4, 2021, at 10:32 AM, Even Rouault wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Updating my yesterday motion with the feedback received (only second bullet
> updated with a more restricted set of drivers)
>
> Motion:
>
> - remove the vector drivers BNA, AeronavFAA, HTF, OpenAir, SEGUKOOA, SEGY,
> SUA,
Hi,
Updating my yesterday motion with the feedback received (only second
bullet updated with a more restricted set of drivers)
Motion:
- remove the vector drivers BNA, AeronavFAA, HTF, OpenAir, SEGUKOOA,
SEGY, SUA, XPlane and raster drivers BPG, E00GRID, EPSILON,
IGNFHeightASCIIGrid, NTv1.
Hi,
https://gdal.org/community/service_providers.html is now online and
waiting for more companies to add themselves.
Even
Le 01/03/2021 à 18:01, Even Rouault a écrit :
Hi
I motion to adopt RFC79: Listing of Service Providers on GDAL website:
https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/3473
Hi Andrew,
On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 at 08:59, Andrew C Aitchison
wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Mar 2021, Javier Jimenez Shaw wrote:
>
> > (using a docker image to convert any of those removed formats if you
> find a
> > file at the bottom of you cellar in the far future is a great
> alternative.
>
> I don't
On Thu, 4 Mar 2021, Javier Jimenez Shaw wrote:
(using a docker image to convert any of those removed formats if you find a
file at the bottom of you cellar in the far future is a great alternative.
I don't have a lot of confidence in being able to run an old docker image
in the far future,
+1
(using a docker image to convert any of those removed formats if you find a
file at the bottom of you cellar in the far future is a great alternative.
Thanks Even)
.___ ._ ..._ .. . ._. .___ .. __ . _. . __.. ... ._ .__
Entre dos pensamientos racionales
hay infinitos pensamientos
22 matches
Mail list logo
