Re: [gdal-dev] Introducing the cogger and godal projects

Hi Thomas, Congratulations! These look like great projects. On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 4:07 AM thomas bonfort wrote: > Hello gdal, > > We're releasing two projects on github under an Apache-2.0 licence > which may be of interest to the GDAL community. > > The first one,

Re: [gdal-dev] Renaming of GDAL Advisory Board

+1 -Jukka Rahkonen- Even Rouault-2 wrote > Hi, > > We just had a meeting with NumFOCUS staff, and they suggested we should > rename the GDAL Advisory Board to something else. The issue is with the > Board term which is a legal term and may implicate that it is a deciding > body, which it is

Re: [gdal-dev] Renaming of GDAL Advisory Board

+1 KurtS On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 9:46 AM Frank Warmerdam wrote: > +1 Frank > > On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 12:36 PM Daniel Morissette < > dmorisse...@mapgears.com> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> Daniel >> >> >> On 2021-06-04 12:24, Even Rouault wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > We just had a meeting with NumFOCUS

Re: [gdal-dev] Renaming of GDAL Advisory Board

+1 Frank On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 12:36 PM Daniel Morissette wrote: > +1 > > Daniel > > > On 2021-06-04 12:24, Even Rouault wrote: > > Hi, > > > > We just had a meeting with NumFOCUS staff, and they suggested we should > > rename the GDAL Advisory Board to something else. The issue is with the >

Re: [gdal-dev] Renaming of GDAL Advisory Board

+1 Daniel On 2021-06-04 12:24, Even Rouault wrote: Hi, We just had a meeting with NumFOCUS staff, and they suggested we should rename the GDAL Advisory Board to something else. The issue is with the Board term which is a legal term and may implicate that it is a deciding body, which it is

Re: [gdal-dev] Introducing the cogger and godal projects

I haven't benchmarked cogger but I'd expect it to be much faster than gdal_translate -of COG (if your input is GeoTIFF and always properly tiled and compressed of course!). gdal_translate -of COG uses generic GDAL API to acquire input data, which implies decompression / recompression. And in

Re: [gdal-dev] Introducing the cogger and godal projects

I haven't extensively used -of COG (the cogger code actually predates the cog driver) but iirc there are at least some cases where it uses an intermediate file, which would imply that cogger does offer some speedups. I'll let Even confirm... Regards, Thomas Le ven. 4 juin 2021 à 18:14, a écrit :

[gdal-dev] Renaming of GDAL Advisory Board

Hi, We just had a meeting with NumFOCUS staff, and they suggested we should rename the GDAL Advisory Board to something else. The issue is with the Board term which is a legal term and may implicate that it is a deciding body, which it is not. They suggested Council, Committee, as potential

Re: [gdal-dev] Introducing the cogger and godal projects

Is cogger specifically for the scenario where your converting a large imagery library that already exists, but isn't cloud optimized? i.e. Does it offer any advantages over the one step `gdal_translate -of cog ...` when starting fresh? Cheers, Matt Geomatics Analyst | Environment | T

Re: [gdal-dev] Introducing the cogger and godal projects

Hi Thomas, cogger is really cool, and certainly a useful complement to the GDAL COG driver (we could probably do something similar in it directly, if the input file is a TIFF, but that doesn't fit in a very natural way in the GDAL machinery). Feel free to submit a PR to the COG driver doc

[gdal-dev] Introducing the cogger and godal projects

Hello gdal, We're releasing two projects on github under an Apache-2.0 licence which may be of interest to the GDAL community. The first one, https://github.com/airbusgeo/cogger is a lightweight geotiff to COG converter that reshuffles the bytes of a tiled geotiff to make it cloud compatible.