Re: [gdal-dev] Merging tiff4 files

Andrea, please read the gtiff driver page at http://www.gdal.org/frmt_gtiff.html you need to add a few options, such as -co COMPRESS=CCITTFAX4 -co NBITS=1 Etienne On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 7:15 PM, Andrea Peri aperi2...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Frank, thx for very rapid response. gdal_merge.py

[gdal-dev] best way to make a branch for a subset of gdal?

Hi all, I would like to setup a git repository of a subset of gdal (the netcdf driver) and I would like to know the best solution. 1) the full git-svn sync as explained in http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/UsingGitToMaintainGDALWorkflow It works, but overkill for my needs. 2) just setup a small

Re: Fwd: [gdal-dev] Re: discussion on improvements to the NetCDF driver and CF-1 convention

Hendy 1) I added an item on the wiki page under I/O issues, can you make a detailed ticket and link to it on the wiki? In the mean time, please use Even's suggestion of using an intermediary format such as VRT. * Support Create() method so that gdalwarp can be used on a netcdf file It's

Re: [gdal-dev] GTiff optimisation

Bonjour Yves, I think that gdalwarp is not optimized for saving compressed geotiffs, you would have to do that in a second step. This topic has been addressed in this list not long ago. Anyway, you should be using gdal_translate (with a_srs flag) instead for this task, as you are just

Re: [gdal-dev] Re: discussion on improvements to the NetCDF driver and CF-1 convention

- From: Brian Case r...@winkey.org To: Etienne Tourigny etienne...@yahoo.com Cc: gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org Sent: Sunday, August 28, 2011 7:54:13 PM Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] Re: discussion on improvements to the NetCDF driver and CF-1 convention any thoughts on a ogr netcdf

Re: [gdal-dev] Re: gdal_rasterize output off by one pixel/cell

I can confirm that the offset fix works for me, using geographic CRS with SAD69 and WGS84 datums. I can't comment on the edge problem. great job! Etienne - Original Message - From: Even Rouault even.roua...@mines-paris.org To: gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org Cc: Hermann Peifer pei...@gmx.eu;

Re: [gdal-dev] Re: discussion on improvements to the NetCDF driver and CF-1 convention

.  regards, Etienne - Original Message - From: Even Rouault even.roua...@mines-paris.org To: gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org; Etienne Tourigny etienne...@yahoo.com Cc: Sent: Friday, August 26, 2011 4:20:06 PM Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] Re: discussion on improvements to the NetCDF driver and CF-1

Re: [gdal-dev] Re: discussion on improvements to the NetCDF driver and CF-1 convention

of a time-axis (or even vertical axis) in GDAL would be ideal, but that would probably be too much an effort for anyone to develop. Knut-Frode Nansen Environmental and Remote Sensing Center On 24/08/2011 22:37, Etienne Tourigny wrote: Hi all, I would like to start a discussion with those

[gdal-dev] discussion on improvements to the NetCDF driver and CF-1 convention

Hi all, I would like to start a discussion with those interested about fixing various issues in the NetCDF driver. As it stands, it is not fully CF-1.0 compliant, and produces geographical grids that are not valid for other software. Also, the infamous up-side down problem has been addressed

<    1   2   3   4