Re: [gdal-dev] Call for discussion for RFC 43 GDALMajorObject::GetMetadataDomainList()

2013-10-23 Thread Even Rouault
Le dimanche 20 octobre 2013 18:21:23, Frank Warmerdam a écrit : Even, I'm happy with this RFC. It's a bit sad that the list of domains is duplicated and has to be freed again by the caller, but it certainly avoids any doubts about the lifetime of the returned list. Hi Frank, Indeed, for

Re: [gdal-dev] Call for discussion for RFC 43 GDALMajorObject::GetMetadataDomainList()

2013-10-23 Thread Kurt Schwehr
Even, I have been trying to think through how an OGR driver for ISO19115 / 19139 would work. I'm going to work on a band aid to the new BAG tweak to their ISO metadata, but we definitely could use a bare driver for read / write. The quest boils down to what is the minimal set of things that

Re: [gdal-dev] Call for discussion for RFC 43 GDALMajorObject::GetMetadataDomainList()

2013-10-23 Thread Even Rouault
Kurt, I have been trying to think through how an OGR driver for ISO19115 / 19139 would work. Do you mean a driver that would read (and/or write) ISO 19139 XML files ? Do such documents fit (enough) well with the OGR data model ? Is there a concept of record/feature ? I'm unfortunately not

Re: [gdal-dev] Call for discussion for RFC 43 GDALMajorObject::GetMetadataDomainList()

2013-10-23 Thread Newcomb, Doug
Does that include the upcoming ISO19115-1 ? Doug On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 10:29 AM, Even Rouault even.roua...@mines-paris.org wrote: Kurt, I have been trying to think through how an OGR driver for ISO19115 / 19139 would work. Do you mean a driver that would read (and/or write) ISO

Re: [gdal-dev] Call for discussion for RFC 43 GDALMajorObject::GetMetadataDomainList()

2013-10-23 Thread Even Rouault
The reader in the BAG directory is a bare minimum implementation. Out side of BAGs there is definitely a need. Pardon my ignorance, but what is CSW? OGC CSW (Catalog Service Webservice) : http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/cat And there are a few OSGeo related projects around this : -

Re: [gdal-dev] Call for discussion for RFC 43 GDALMajorObject::GetMetadataDomainList()

2013-10-20 Thread xavier lhomme
Hi Is there a way to export Metadata in a XML form (ISO 19139 XML implementation of ISO 19115 ) ? xav 2013/10/19 Even Rouault even.roua...@mines-paris.org Hi, This is a call for discussion for RFC 43 GDALMajorObject::GetMetadataDomainList() :

Re: [gdal-dev] Call for discussion for RFC 43 GDALMajorObject::GetMetadataDomainList()

2013-10-20 Thread Even Rouault
Le dimanche 20 octobre 2013 11:38:24, xavier lhomme a écrit : Hi Is there a way to export Metadata in a XML form (ISO 19139 XML implementation of ISO 19115 ) ? Xavier, This is clearly out of the scope of this RFC. Apart from a few basic items ( raster dimensions, tiling, geotransform/GCP,

Re: [gdal-dev] Call for discussion for RFC 43 GDALMajorObject::GetMetadataDomainList()

2013-10-20 Thread Frank Warmerdam
Even, I'm happy with this RFC. It's a bit sad that the list of domains is duplicated and has to be freed again by the caller, but it certainly avoids any doubts about the lifetime of the returned list. I have an internal driver here at Planet Labs where I tree any subnode in our JSON metadata

[gdal-dev] Call for discussion for RFC 43 GDALMajorObject::GetMetadataDomainList()

2013-10-19 Thread Even Rouault
Hi, This is a call for discussion for RFC 43 GDALMajorObject::GetMetadataDomainList() : http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc43_getmetadatadomainlist Beginning of the RFC inline : == Summary == This (mini)RFC proposes a new virtual method, GetMetadataDomainList(), in the GDALMajorObject