Even,
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Even Rouault
even.roua...@mines-paris.org wrote:
Hi,
This is a call for discussion on RFC 46: GDAL/OGR unification
http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc46_gdal_ogr_unification
Best regards,
Even
--
Geospatial professional services
On 15/05/2014 20:47, Even Rouault wrote:
Le jeudi 08 mai 2014 00:13:22, Even Rouault a écrit :
Hi,
This is a call for discussion on RFC 46: GDAL/OGR unification
http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc46_gdal_ogr_unification
No reaction : no interest or no time to review yet ?
Or should I
.
Regards,
Ivan
From: even.roua...@mines-paris.org
To: gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 20:47:32 +0200
Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] Call for discussion on RFC 46: GDAL/OGR
unification
Le jeudi 08 mai 2014 00:13:22, Even Rouault a écrit
Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 13:36:08 +0200
From: even.roua...@mines-paris.org
To: lucena_i...@hotmail.com
CC: even.roua...@mines-paris.org; gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: RE: [gdal-dev] Call for discussion on RFC 46: GDAL/OGR
unification
Ivan,
yes
Envoyé : vendredi 16 mai 2014 04:03
À : Even Rouault
Cc : gdal dev
Objet : Re: [gdal-dev] Call for discussion on RFC 46: GDAL/OGR unification
Even,
I have (finally) looked over the RFC and I'm super pleased. I couldn't find
anything I wanted to argue against, and it all looks excellent to me
+0200
Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] Call for discussion on RFC 46: GDAL/OGR unification
Le jeudi 08 mai 2014 00:13:22, Even Rouault a écrit :
Hi,
This is a call for discussion on RFC 46: GDAL/OGR unification
http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc46_gdal_ogr_unification
No reaction
Hi Nicolas,
Hi list,
I'm a little disappointed because I have hoped to find in version 2 a
reinforcement (unification) of the semantics of operations against the
reported capabilities (cf OGRLayer.TestCapability)
Apart from the below example, are you thinking to other things ?
RFC 46 is
for discussion on RFC 46: GDAL/OGR unification
Le jeudi 08 mai 2014 00:13:22, Even Rouault a écrit :
Hi,
This is a call for discussion on RFC 46: GDAL/OGR unification
http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc46_gdal_ogr_unification
No reaction : no interest or no time to review yet
May 2014 20:47:32 +0200
Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] Call for discussion on RFC 46: GDAL/OGR
unification
Le jeudi 08 mai 2014 00:13:22, Even Rouault a écrit :
Hi,
This is a call for discussion on RFC 46: GDAL/OGR unification
http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki
+0200
Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] Call for discussion on RFC 46: GDAL/OGR
unification
Le jeudi 08 mai 2014 00:13:22, Even Rouault a écrit :
Hi,
This is a call for discussion on RFC 46: GDAL/OGR unification
http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc46_gdal_ogr_unification
May 2014 13:36:08 +0200
From: even.roua...@mines-paris.org
To: lucena_i...@hotmail.com
CC: even.roua...@mines-paris.org; gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: RE: [gdal-dev] Call for discussion on RFC 46: GDAL/OGR
unification
Ivan,
yes indeed, I missed that one. I'll update the RFC
I went through the whole RFC and it looks great!
Even, this looks like an incredible amount of work and I wanted to thank you
for undertaking it.
Ragi
--
View this message in context:
http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/gdal-dev-Call-for-discussion-on-RFC-46-GDAL-OGR-unification
Hi Etienne,
That sounds great!
Thanks to point that out.
Regards,
Ivan
Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 11:25:13 -0300
Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] Call for discussion on RFC 46: GDAL/OGR unification
From: etourigny@gmail.com
To: lucena_i...@hotmail.com
CC: even.roua...@mines-paris.org; gdal-dev
13 matches
Mail list logo
