Has someone already documented the performance difference between x32 and
x64 versions of the FWTools / gdal? Improvement by how much? Many thanks.
Kevin
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 1:39 AM, John Mitchell mitchellj...@gmail.comwrote:
Does anyone have built/compiled 64 bit versions of either
2010/6/9 GeoSpatial - Kevin gs.kev...@gmail.com
Has someone already documented the performance difference between x32 and
x64 versions of the FWTools / gdal? Improvement by how much? Many thanks.
Kevin,
I don't expect too much difference in performance, and I'm not aware of any
compare
John,
I have compiled GDAL 1.7.2, released 2010/04/23 on the following...
cat /etc/fedora-release
Fedora release 10 (Cambridge)
Linux dougwh 2.6.27.35-170.2.94.fc10.x86_64 #1 SMP Thu Oct 1 14:41:38
EDT 2009 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
/home/dougw/gdal-1.7.2 $ ./configure
Does anyone have built/compiled 64 bit versions of either FWTools or gdal for:
a.) Windows 64 bit
b.) Linux 64 bit
Thanks,
John
--
John J. Mitchell
___
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
Frank Warmerdam kirjoitti:
John Mitchell wrote:
Does anyone have built/compiled 64 bit versions of either FWTools or
gdal for:
a.) Windows 64 bit
John,
Tamas maintains win64 builds at:
http://vbkto.dyndns.org/sdk/
b.) Linux 64 bit
I'm not aware of 64bit builds except possibly
On 02-06-2010 16:39, John Mitchell wrote:
Does anyone have built/compiled 64 bit versions of either FWTools or gdal for:
a.) Windows 64 bit
I do that +/- regularly on Win7 with VS2010. No problem at all. The main
work was to compile all other libs that I link gdal with.
Joaquim
