Re: [gdal-dev] How far can we resolve complex GeoJSON?

2020-02-14 Thread Even Rouault
> If this JSON is coming from a WFS, won't there be a JSON schema of some > kind provided by the server? The WFS3 driver has some (primitive) support for JSON schema and XML schema, but only for the "simple features" profile. > Would using OGR's WFS3 driver instead of GeoJSON help? No, it uses

Re: [gdal-dev] How far can we resolve complex GeoJSON?

2020-02-14 Thread Sean Gillies
Hi Jukka, Even, On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 4:43 PM Even Rouault wrote: > On jeudi 13 février 2020 21:06:57 CET Rahkonen Jukka (MML) wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Have a look at data returned by request > > > https://beta-paikkatieto.maanmittauslaitos.fi/geographic-names/wfs3/v1/coll > >

Re: [gdal-dev] How far can we resolve complex GeoJSON?

2020-02-13 Thread Even Rouault
On jeudi 13 février 2020 21:06:57 CET Rahkonen Jukka (MML) wrote: > Hi, > > Have a look at data returned by request > https://beta-paikkatieto.maanmittauslaitos.fi/geographic-names/wfs3/v1/coll > ections/placenames/items?municipality=837=100 There exists couple of > features with "parallelName"

[gdal-dev] How far can we resolve complex GeoJSON?

2020-02-13 Thread Rahkonen Jukka (MML)
Hi, Have a look at data returned by request https://beta-paikkatieto.maanmittauslaitos.fi/geographic-names/wfs3/v1/collections/placenames/items?municipality=837=100 There exists couple of features with "parallelName" and GDAL converts that part into a string type attribute parallelName