Hi,
> So:
>
> Motion : I move to adopt RFC 50: OGR field subtypes
>
> http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc50_ogr_field_subtype
>
> Starting with my +1
I declare this motion passed with support from JukkaR, TamasS, FrankW and
myself.
Even
--
Spatialys - Geospatial professional services
http:
+1 Frank
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 12:38 AM, Even Rouault
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think that the points raised in the discussion have been answered.
>
> So:
>
> Motion : I move to adopt RFC 50: OGR field subtypes
>
> http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc50_ogr_field_subtype
>
> Starting with my +1
>
> Be
+1
Tamas
2014-11-24 9:38 GMT+01:00 Even Rouault :
> Hi,
>
> I think that the points raised in the discussion have been answered.
>
> So:
>
> Motion : I move to adopt RFC 50: OGR field subtypes
>
> http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc50_ogr_field_subtype
>
> Starting with my +1
>
> Best regards,
Even Rouault spatialys.com> writes:
> I think that the points raised in the discussion have been answered.
>
> So:
>
> Motion : I move to adopt RFC 50: OGR field subtypes
>
> http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc50_ogr_field_subtype
>
> Starting with my +1
+1
-Jukka Rahkonen-
___
Hi,
I think that the points raised in the discussion have been answered.
So:
Motion : I move to adopt RFC 50: OGR field subtypes
http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc50_ogr_field_subtype
Starting with my +1
Best regards,
Even
--
Spatialys - Geospatial professional services
http://www.spatial
