+1 Frank
I think we are using it at scale and have ironed out our problems.
On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 10:16 AM Tamas Szekeres wrote:
> +1
>
> Tamas
>
>
> Even Rouault ezt írta (időpont: 2018. dec.
> 18., K, 12:35):
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Motion: GDAL/OGR 2.3.3 rc2 is promoted to be the official 2.3.3
+1
Tamas
Even Rouault ezt írta (időpont: 2018. dec.
18., K, 12:35):
> Hi,
>
> Motion: GDAL/OGR 2.3.3 rc2 is promoted to be the official 2.3.3 final
> release.
>
> ---
>
> My vote: +1
>
> ---
>
> Note: https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/issues/1156 was raised yesterday.
> Would
> have been
+1
Daniel
On 2018-12-18 6:35 a.m., Even Rouault wrote:
Hi,
Motion: GDAL/OGR 2.3.3 rc2 is promoted to be the official 2.3.3 final release.
---
My vote: +1
---
Note: https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/issues/1156 was raised yesterday. Would
have been good if it had been in 2.3.3 but I
+1
Howard
On 12/18/18 6:15 AM, jratike80 wrote:
> +1
>
> -Jukka Rahkonen-
>
>
> Even Rouault-2 wrote
>> Hi,
>>
>> Motion: GDAL/OGR 2.3.3 rc2 is promoted to be the official 2.3.3 final
>> release.
>>
>> ---
>>
>> My vote: +1
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Note:
+1
-Jukka Rahkonen-
Even Rouault-2 wrote
> Hi,
>
> Motion: GDAL/OGR 2.3.3 rc2 is promoted to be the official 2.3.3 final
> release.
>
> ---
>
> My vote: +1
>
> ---
>
> Note: https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/issues/1156 was raised yesterday.
> Would
> have been good if it had been in
Hi,
Motion: GDAL/OGR 2.3.3 rc2 is promoted to be the official 2.3.3 final release.
---
My vote: +1
---
Note: https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/issues/1156 was raised yesterday. Would
have been good if it had been in 2.3.3 but I don't really feel like doing
another RC for that, so that
