Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: adopt RFC 85: Policy regarding substantial code additions

2022-01-25 Thread Even Rouault
I declare this motion passed with +1 from PSC members: MateuszL, KurtS, TamasS, SeanG, HowardB, JukkaR and me. Le 21/01/2022 à 11:18, Even Rouault a écrit : Hi, As the discussion seems to have calmed down, I move to adopt RFC 85: Policy regarding substantial code additions:

Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: adopt RFC 85: Policy regarding substantial code additions

2022-01-21 Thread Even Rouault
Should we then change it from "substantion code additions" to "code additions including (or perhaps interfacing to) non-open code" ? The scope is a bit beyond that: see my comment https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/5128#discussion_r787095661 -- http://www.spatialys.com My software is free,

Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: adopt RFC 85: Policy regarding substantial code additions

2022-01-21 Thread Andrew C Aitchison
On Fri, 21 Jan 2022, Howard Butler wrote: On Jan 21, 2022, at 11:05 AM, Sean Gillies wrote: +1 from me. Howard, I really appreciate how you're reminding us that what proprietary vendors want is for GDAL to help distribute their software. Writing code that works is the easy part. Getting it

Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: adopt RFC 85: Policy regarding substantial code additions

2022-01-21 Thread Howard Butler
> On Jan 21, 2022, at 11:05 AM, Sean Gillies wrote: > > +1 from me. > > Howard, I really appreciate how you're reminding us that what proprietary > vendors want is for GDAL to help distribute their software. Writing code that > works is the easy part. Getting it onto computers and getting

Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: adopt RFC 85: Policy regarding substantial code additions

2022-01-21 Thread Sean Gillies
+1 from me. Howard, I really appreciate how you're reminding us that what proprietary vendors want is for GDAL to help distribute their software. Writing code that works is the easy part. Getting it onto computers and getting people to use it is the hard part. On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 3:18 AM

Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: adopt RFC 85: Policy regarding substantial code additions

2022-01-21 Thread Tamas Szekeres
+1 Tamas Even Rouault ezt írta (időpont: 2022. jan. 21., P, 11:18): > Hi, > > As the discussion seems to have calmed down, I move to adopt RFC 85: > Policy regarding substantial code additions: > https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/5128 > > Starting with my +1 > > Even > > -- >

Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: adopt RFC 85: Policy regarding substantial code additions

2022-01-21 Thread Kurt Schwehr
+1 KurtS On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 2:18 AM Even Rouault wrote: > Hi, > > As the discussion seems to have calmed down, I move to adopt RFC 85: > Policy regarding substantial code additions: > https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/5128 > > Starting with my +1 > > Even > > -- > http://www.spatialys.com

Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: adopt RFC 85: Policy regarding substantial code additions

2022-01-21 Thread Mateusz Loskot
+1 Mateusz On Fri, 21 Jan 2022 at 11:18, Even Rouault wrote: > > Hi, > > As the discussion seems to have calmed down, I move to adopt RFC 85: > Policy regarding substantial code additions: > https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/5128 > > Starting with my +1 > > Even > > -- >

Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: adopt RFC 85: Policy regarding substantial code additions

2022-01-21 Thread Rahkonen Jukka (MML)
+1 -Jukka Rahkonen- -Alkuperäinen viesti- Lähettäjä: gdal-dev Puolesta Even Rouault Lähetetty: perjantai 21. tammikuuta 2022 12.18 Vastaanottaja: gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org Aihe: [gdal-dev] Motion: adopt RFC 85: Policy regarding substantial code additions Hi, As the discussion seems

[gdal-dev] Motion: adopt RFC 85: Policy regarding substantial code additions

2022-01-21 Thread Even Rouault
Hi, As the discussion seems to have calmed down, I move to adopt RFC 85: Policy regarding substantial code additions: https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/5128 Starting with my +1 Even -- http://www.spatialys.com My software is free, but my time generally not.