Hi Even,
I'm not trying to re-ignite the stereo debate but I think there's more
to the issue with the warning. I've realized that the particular EPSG
code 3844 (not sure about others) is reported totally different by
ogrinfo and gdalinfo. It's not the actual reporting that's wrong but the
way
Le dimanche 20 février 2011 00:24:16, Marius Jigmond a écrit :
Is the disconnect simply a reporting issue and reprojections are handled
properly behind the scenes when using this EPSG code? It seems that what
gdalinfo reports is in accordance to
Should it then match http://spatialreference.org/ref/epsg/3844/esriwkt/
because it does not seem to? I apologize if my questions seem silly.
-marius
On Sun, 2011-02-20 at 00:38 +0100, Even Rouault wrote:
Le dimanche 20 février 2011 00:24:16, Marius Jigmond a écrit :
Is the disconnect
Le dimanche 20 février 2011 00:46:07, Marius Jigmond a écrit :
Should it then match http://spatialreference.org/ref/epsg/3844/esriwkt/
because it does not seem to? I apologize if my questions seem silly.
With all respect due to the great job of that site, I'm not sure you can
blindly trust
Hi Everyone,
Some of the options (I didn't test all) introduced with version 1.8.0
seem to behave strangely. Here's what I'm doing:
1. gdal_rasterize -burn 0 -i -l mask mask.shp sample.tif
works fine but I get the following warning:
Warning : the output raster dataset and the input vector layer
Eli,
Both input datasets (mask and raster) exist, which is why 1. works.
Option 1 doesn't use any of version 1.8.0 flags, which is why I thought
something else was introduced behind the scenes with the new flags.
-marius
On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 12:08 -0800, Eli Adam wrote:
Marius,
I don't
Marius,
I don't know about 1. but possibilities for 2. and 3 below.
Hi Everyone,
Some of the options (I didn't test all) introduced with version 1.8.0
seem to behave strangely. Here's what I'm doing:
1. gdal_rasterize -burn 0 -i -l mask mask.shp sample.tif
works fine but I get the
On Sat, 2011-02-05 at 00:06 +0100, Even Rouault wrote:
Le vendredi 04 février 2011 20:25:43, Marius Jigmond a écrit :
Hi Everyone,
Some of the options (I didn't test all) introduced with version 1.8.0
seem to behave strangely. Here's what I'm doing:
1. gdal_rasterize -burn 0 -i -l
