On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Ari Simmons ari.ucb.f...@gmail.com wrote:
Do you mean
gdal_translate -te -13813007 5569641 -13809113 5572598
srtm_merged_3857.vrt my_subwindow.tif --config GDAL_CACHEMAX 800
?
Oops, I made a bad typo by omitting -projwin:
gdal_translate -projwin -13813007
Do you mean
gdal_translate -te -13813007 5569641 -13809113 5572598
srtm_merged_3857.vrt my_subwindow.tif --config GDAL_CACHEMAX 800
?
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 3:08 PM, Eli Adam ea...@co.lincoln.or.us wrote:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Ari Simmons ari.ucb.f...@gmail.com
wrote:
One
I am experimenting with using 'gdalwarp' on a .vrt (first time), but I'm
not sure what I'm doing wrong. I've been running this:
gdalwarp -s_srs EPSG:4326 -t_srs EPSG:3857 -r bilinear -of VRT
merged.vrt srtm_merged_3857.vrt
and it processes fast (far far *too fast* for this global file) and
One notably huge difference is that there is a huge jump in pixel size
(from 0.0008323 to 205.686440189378940)...
ah, duh. Unit change.
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 2:26 PM, Ari Simmons ari.ucb.f...@gmail.com wrote:
I am experimenting with using 'gdalwarp' on a .vrt (first time), but I'm
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Ari Simmons ari.ucb.f...@gmail.com wrote:
One notably huge difference is that there is a huge jump in pixel size (from
0.0008323 to 205.686440189378940)...
ah, duh. Unit change.
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 2:26 PM, Ari Simmons ari.ucb.f...@gmail.com
