Jan, can you please add your sample dataset and comments in that ticket?
Etienne
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Etienne B. Racine etienn...@gmail.comwrote:
I added a ticket http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/5311
Etienne
2013/12/2 Etienne Tourigny etourigny@gmail.com
The average
Etienne, I've added the relevant files. I think it's sufficient to debug
the function, but if you think it might be helpful, I could add a larger
raster and the results of the aggregation.
Etienne
2013/12/6 Etienne Tourigny etourigny@gmail.com
Jan, can you please add your sample dataset
I have attached a patch to the ticket that fixes the problem. Anyone
interested is welcome to test it.
regards, Etienne
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Etienne B. Racine etienn...@gmail.comwrote:
Etienne, I've added the relevant files. I think it's sufficient to debug
the function, but if
I added a ticket http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/5311
Etienne
2013/12/2 Etienne Tourigny etourigny@gmail.com
The average resampling mode of gdalwarp does average resampling,
computes the average of all non-NODATA contributing pixels.
It was meant to compute the average of all the
I've tried to dig this a bit. I couldn't understand the logic behind gdal
aggregation (or downsampling). I've simplified your example using a smaller
raster and deterministic values. Maybe someone could enlighten us by
looking at the aggregation values ? Note that the lower right cells values
were
The average resampling mode of gdalwarp does average resampling,
computes the average of all non-NODATA contributing pixels.
It was meant to compute the average of all the pixels in the aggregation
window. However, it may have issues in the corners.
I am the author of the average and mode
Hi all,
I have been testing gdalwarp to aggregate (using -r average) an image.
In order to better understand what is happening I have created a
reproducible example within an R environment and compared it with the
aggregate function of the R raster package (see below). There are some
differences
