I can't get to it right now, but the new date would be found in the update
file. So this would only occur on cells with updates. If I open an update
file (.001+) in a text editor, I see the date on the second line.
I'm just using the first cell found @
www.charts.noaa.gov/ENCs/ENCsIndv.shtml
ah - the situation you're describing is subtly different. That's when you
have two 8211 fields concatenated together, so e.g the DSID/DSSI are
concatenated into a single 8211 record at the head of a standard S-57 ENC.
What I'm talking about is when a single 8211 field has repeating subfield
On jeudi 30 août 2018 07:29:12 CEST Mike wrote:
> The multiple field/subfields - I think gdal already does this for S-57 on
> DSID. It just prefixes the subfields with the field name.
>
> However -side note: it seems the DSID_ISDT (issue date) is incorrect, it
> just has the same value as
The multiple field/subfields - I think gdal already does this for S-57 on
DSID. It just prefixes the subfields with the field name.
However -side note: it seems the DSID_ISDT (issue date) is incorrect, it
just has the same value as DSID_UADT (update application date).
On Thu, Aug 30, 2018, 4:27
The biggest work item for S-100 compatibility would be an update to the
GDAL/OGR drivers for iso8211 in order to parse the S-101 iso8211 encoding.
S-101 is the candidate replacement for S-57 ENC data - so, at some point
all of NOAA's S-57 marine data will be available as S-101 datasets too.
All,
I've committed in GDAL master various improvements in the BAG driver, around
two main directions:
- read support for variable resolution BAG, with resampling and interpolation
options
- creating of (single resolution) BAG files from other GDAL datasets
Updated documentation available at
I'd be happy to connect anyone with the folks at NOAA, CCOM-JHC, and
elsewhere who have been participating in drafting S-10x. I only sat in on
a few of the meetings long ago.
Specs should eventually end up here...
https://www.iho.int/iho_pubs/IHO_Download.htm#S-100
On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 10:43
Kelly,
>
> I know GDAL/OGR supports S-57 format, but could not see where it supports
> S-100.
>
> Is there a plan to support the latest IHO S-100 and S-102 standards in the
> near future?
I'm not aware of anyone working on that currently.
I had difficulties finding concrete documentation
