On Mon, 10 Feb 2020 at 22:30, Sean Gillies wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 1:56 AM Even Rouault
> wrote:
>>
>> So looking at https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/issues/2117, it seems we didn't
>> get more proposals than the ones from 2 weeks ago. There are 3 proposals in
>> the initial post of the
On 2020-02-10 4:56 a.m., Even Rouault wrote:
So looking at https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/issues/2117, it seems we didn't
get more proposals than the ones from 2 weeks ago. There are 3 proposals in
the initial post of the ticket: nirvn_v1, nirvn_v2 and nirvn_v3
In
Hi Even,
On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 1:56 AM Even Rouault
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So looking at https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/issues/2117, it seems we
> didn't
> get more proposals than the ones from 2 weeks ago. There are 3 proposals
> in
> the initial post of the ticket: nirvn_v1, nirvn_v2 and nirvn_v3
I personally like nirvn_v2
On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 01:56 Even Rouault
mailto:even.roua...@spatialys.com>> wrote:
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the University of Saskatchewan.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know
the content is safe.
On jeudi 23 janvier 2020 18:43:24 CET Even Rouault wrote:
> On jeudi 23 janvier 2020 18:35:40 CET Edzer Pebesma wrote:
> > On 1/23/20 5:58 PM, Even Rouault wrote:
> > >> Thanks! Yes, with SRS->importFromUserInput("EPSG:3857"); etc this works
> > >> fine; I'm OK with the warning, I just don't see
Hi,
It does really work for others. I just verified with GDAL 3.1.0dev and 2.4.2
on Windows. Could you repeat the test carefully with the bare minimum
gdalwarp -dstalpha without_alpha.tif with_alpha.tif
If it does not work please arrange a reproducible test case for us by
telling how to get
Hi,
So looking at https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/issues/2117, it seems we didn't
get more proposals than the ones from 2 weeks ago. There are 3 proposals in
the initial post of the ticket: nirvn_v1, nirvn_v2 and nirvn_v3
In https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/issues/2117#issuecomment-570059241 ,
