Re: [gdal-dev] Considering drivers removal ?

2021-01-28 Thread Howard Butler
I am also supportive of RFC approvals before someone goes and invests the time to develop a driver. Otherwise it is easy to get in the spot where it's not merged because the community didn't want it included. A nice thing the RFC process would ensure is a full document of the expectations of

Re: [gdal-dev] Considering drivers removal ?

2021-01-28 Thread Tamas Szekeres
Hi Sean, I would also be supportive to formalize the driver submission process. Best regards, Tamas Sean Gillies ezt írta (időpont: 2021. jan. 28., Cs, 17:39): > Hi Tamas, > > Are you suggesting that a RFC be required for a new driver? I would > support this 100%. > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2021

Re: [gdal-dev] Considering drivers removal ?

2021-01-28 Thread Sean Gillies via gdal-dev
Hi Tamas, Are you suggesting that a RFC be required for a new driver? I would support this 100%. On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 2:17 PM Tamas Szekeres wrote: > David, > > Up to this time the driver writers were highly welcomed to author new > drivers for the project and these effort didn't require a

Re: [gdal-dev] Considering drivers removal ?

2021-01-28 Thread Andrew C Aitchison
On Wed, 27 Jan 2021, gdisk.mike wrote: Just curious - Some time ago there was a motion for RFC 76 - OGR Python drivers. Correct me if I'm wrong, but this sort of makes it easy to add python drivers? Perhaps this could be a means for others to add/reclaim a driver that gets dropped? RFC 76 is