Even,
xxx/gdal/gdal docker run --rm -v /home:/home
osgeo/gdal:ubuntu-full-latest ogrinfo --config GDAL_PYTHON_DRIVER_PATH
$PWD/examples/pydrivers --format CityJSON
works.
Sorry for the noise ...
MArco
On 09-12-19 18:35, Marco wrote:
Even,
Thanks but ...
/gdal$ docker run --rm -v
Even,
Thanks but ...
/gdal$ docker run --rm -v /home:/home osgeo/gdal:ubuntu-full-latest
ogrinfo --config GDAL_PYTHON_DRIVER_PATH $PWD/examples/pydrivers
--format CityJSON
ERROR 1: --format option given with format 'CityJSON', but that format not
recognised. Use the --formats option to
Marco,
> I used the Dockerfile from
> https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/tree/master/gdal/docker/ubuntu-full
> to build a container from master. I copied in all example drivers and an
> example cityjson file.
>
> In this I ran the autotest pytest -vvs ogr/ succesfully.
>
> However, trying to use the
RFC76 implementation is now available in master
Even
--
I used the Dockerfile from
https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/tree/master/gdal/docker/ubuntu-full
to build a container from master. I copied in all example drivers and an
example cityjson file.
In this I ran the autotest pytest -vvs ogr/
On vendredi 15 novembre 2019 18:03:07 CET Even Rouault wrote:
> I declare the motion passed with the following votes from PSC members:
> +1 from EvenR, JukkaR, MateuzL, DanielM
> -0 from SeanG
> +0 from HowardB
RFC76 implementation is now available in master
Even
--
Spatialys - Geospatial
I declare the motion passed with the following votes from PSC members:
+1 from EvenR, JukkaR, MateuzL, DanielM
-0 from SeanG
+0 from HowardB
Even
> Even,
>
> Great!
> Of course my +1
>
> MArco
>
> On 13-11-19 15:22, Even Rouault wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've updated both the RFC text and
+1
Daniel
On 2019-11-13 09:22, Even Rouault wrote:
Hi,
I've updated both the RFC text and candidate implementation with the
provided comments, so I think we are now good to vote on it.
~~
Motion: adopt RFC 76 OGR Python drivers:
Hi,
I am not so worried. The alternative for people possibly interested in
building experimental Python drivers is not to make a new thoroughly tested
C++ plugin into GDAL core. Rather they will make experimental processes by
some other means. I am just discussing with someone who has made
On jeudi 14 novembre 2019 08:11:19 CET Howard Butler wrote:
> +0.
>
> I worry this will rot, and I worry people will start distributing drivers
> based on it and adding a lot of complexity for users. A note stating that
> the project is not going to distribute Python-based drivers as part of its
+0.
I worry this will rot, and I worry people will start distributing drivers
based on it and adding a lot of complexity for users. A note stating that
the project is not going to distribute Python-based drivers as part of its
baseline would make our intentions clear, but that isn't going to
+1
Mateusz
Even Rouault-2 wrote
> Hi,
>
> I've updated both the RFC text and candidate implementation with the
> provided comments, so I think we are now good to vote on it.
>
> ~~
>
> Motion: adopt RFC 76 OGR Python drivers:
>
Even,
Great work, thank you so much!
+1
Raymond
On 13-11-19 15:22, Even Rouault wrote:
Hi,
I've updated both the RFC text and candidate implementation with the
provided comments, so I think we are now good to vote on it.
~~
Motion: adopt RFC 76 OGR Python drivers:
The implementation is fine. Thanks for listening to my comments, Even. I
think that plugins are really the business of apps like QGIS and MapServer
and that plugins in GDAL complicate the situation for developers, but one
might use these with caution in some special cases. -0 from me.
On Wed, Nov
+1
-Jukka Rahkonen-
Even Rouault-2 wrote
> Hi,
>
> I've updated both the RFC text and candidate implementation with the
> provided comments, so I think we are now good to vote on it.
>
> ~~
>
> Motion: adopt RFC 76 OGR Python drivers:
>
Even,
Great!
Of course my +1
MArco
On 13-11-19 15:22, Even Rouault wrote:
Hi,
I've updated both the RFC text and candidate implementation with the
provided comments, so I think we are now good to vote on it.
~~
Motion: adopt RFC 76 OGR Python drivers:
Hi,
I've updated both the RFC text and candidate implementation with the
provided comments, so I think we are now good to vote on it.
~~
Motion: adopt RFC 76 OGR Python drivers:
16 matches
Mail list logo
