Re: [gdal-dev] GH repo - write access

2018-04-08 Thread Even Rouault
On dimanche 8 avril 2018 22:36:27 CEST Martin Landa wrote: > Hi, > > is there any policy of assigning write access to GH repository for > those of developers who had such permission for old SVN repo? Hi Martin, Yep, just ask as your did. I've just sent you an invite. Please also add yourself in

Re: [gdal-dev] GH repo - write access

2018-04-08 Thread Martin Landa
Hi, 2018-04-08 23:01 GMT+02:00 Even Rouault : > It is up to you, and your confidence in your change. There can be 3 > strategies: > * directly push to origin (https://github.com/OSGeo gdal) > * do a pull request if Iyou want other people to have a chance to review

Re: [gdal-dev] GH repo - write access

2018-04-08 Thread Even Rouault
> Do you mean [1]? My name seems to be already there. > Yes, but we've added a new git related section at the top of the file. Your name is in the old SVN section. > Ma > > [1] https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/blob/master/gdal/COMMITTERS -- Spatialys - Geospatial professional services

Re: [gdal-dev] GH repo - write access

2018-04-08 Thread Martin Landa
Hi Even, 2018-04-08 22:40 GMT+02:00 Even Rouault : > Yep, just ask as your did. > I've just sent you an invite. thanks! > Please also add yourself in the new section of COMMITTERS where we list folks > with git push rights Do you mean [1]? My name seems to be

Re: [gdal-dev] [GRASS-dev] PROJ 5 support in trunk

2018-04-08 Thread Markus Metz
On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 1:57 PM, Kristian Evers wrote: > > Markus, > > > > Sorry for the late reply – you mail got caught by the corporate spam filter. > > > > > The challenge is that users of other software using the new PROJ API like GDAL and GRASS expect that reprojecting a

Re: [gdal-dev] GH repo - write access

2018-04-08 Thread Martin Landa
Hi, 2018-04-08 22:38 GMT+02:00 Dan Little : > With GitHub, you usually do a personal fork and then submit a pull request. > Not quite as easy as direct commits to the main repository but standard > practice. really? I thought that PR is mechanism for those who haven't

Re: [gdal-dev] GH repo - write access

2018-04-08 Thread Even Rouault
> Question: So _core_ GDAL developers (with write access) should also > create PR? Than wait for feedback and any many cases apply PR on their > own? It is up to you, and your confidence in your change. There can be 3 strategies: * directly push to origin (https://github.com/OSGeo gdal) * do a

[gdal-dev] GH repo - write access

2018-04-08 Thread Martin Landa
Hi, is there any policy of assigning write access to GH repository for those of developers who had such permission for old SVN repo? I would like to fix [1], do I need to express my interest for write access explicitly somehow? Thanks, Martin [1] https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/issues/365 --

Re: [gdal-dev] GH repo - write access

2018-04-08 Thread Martin Landa
Hi, 2018-04-08 22:59 GMT+02:00 Dan Little : > A good practice that I've seen many projects use is that one is not allowed > to merge their own PRs without a review. So even a core-committer would go > though the same steps regardless of "write access." That's