[gdal-dev] Lost in decimals... geotransform in python 2.7

2018-12-09 Thread Nicolas Cadieux
Hi, I am trying to get the four corners of a raster the size of Canada (very big therefore decimals count).  If I get the geotransform, I get: geotransform: (-132.000417, 0.0008334, 0.0, 53.0004166, 0.0, -0.0008334) In Python 2.7: print

[gdal-dev] FlatGeobuf; proposal for a new performance oriented vector file format

2018-12-09 Thread Björn Harrtell
Hi GDAL/OGR folks, In my spare time I've been working on a vector file format called FlatGeobuf (tentatively). The main reason, besides curiosity and learning, I'm putting time into it is that I think shapefile still rules the read/query static data performance game, which is kind of sad, and

Re: [gdal-dev] Lost in decimals... geotransform in python 2.7

2018-12-09 Thread Even Rouault
On dimanche 9 décembre 2018 11:42:27 CET Nicolas Cadieux wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to get the four corners of a raster the size of Canada (very > big therefore decimals count). If I get the geotransform, I get: > > geotransform: (-132.000417, 0.0008334, 0.0, >

Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: adopt RFC 72: Run tests with pytest

2018-12-09 Thread jratike80
+0 -Jukka Rahkonen- Even Rouault-2 wrote > PSC members, > > gentle reminder to cast your vote on this. > > Thanks, > > Even -- Sent from: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/GDAL-Dev-f3742093.html ___ gdal-dev mailing list

Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: adopt RFC 72: Run tests with pytest

2018-12-09 Thread Craig de Stigter
Jonathan > it's worth spending a little thought on coming up with a scheme for test-ids. I've been through the list of parametrized tests and tweaked the `ids` kwargs to make them a little more helpful at first glance:

Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: adopt RFC 72: Run tests with pytest

2018-12-09 Thread Kurt Schwehr
I haven't had a chance to read the RFC yet, so I can't yet vote. However, a huge thank you to Craig and everyone else who put in effort to make this happen! On Sun, Dec 9, 2018 at 7:05 PM Craig de Stigter < craig.destig...@koordinates.com> wrote: > Jonathan > > > it's worth spending a little