+1
-Jukka Rahkonen-
Even Rouault-2 wrote
> Hi,
>
> I've been considering an early GDAL 2.4.0 release for the end of this year
> instead of the traditionnal mid-April / May target.
--
Sent from: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/GDAL-Dev-f3742093.html
Hi Even,
Would be great to get Craig's pytest revamp (
https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/963) landed for 2.4 so the old unit
tests can die a quiet death in the 2.3 branch. Otherwise backporting tests
to 2.4 will be a struggle.
Feels like it’s very nearly ready though, so your timeline should
Hi Even,
Many of the tasks in
https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/edit/master/gdal/HOWTO-RELEASE are beyond me
(looks like it needs root on the osgeo server and Maven knowledge) but I
signed myself up for writing the NEWS file in
https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/issues/1119.
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at
Hi,
út 27. 11. 2018 v 18:12 odesílatel Daniel Morissette
napsal:
> +1 for me. I like your plan.
make sense to me
+1
Martin
--
Martin Landa
http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa
http://gismentors.cz/mentors/landa
___
gdal-dev mailing list
+1 for me. I like your plan.
Daniel
On 2018-11-27 11:59 a.m., Even Rouault wrote:
Hi,
I've been considering an early GDAL 2.4.0 release for the end of this year
instead of the traditionnal mid-April / May target.
The rationale is that the work related to the GDAL/PROJ SRS revamp effort (aka
