Re: [gdmxml] Representation

2002-08-18 Thread Stan Mitchell
introduce too much of my own interpretation. Stan MitchellGDMUML: http://freepages.tech.rootsweb.com/~mitchellsharp/- Original Message -From: "RCA" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: "Hans Fugal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002

Re: [gdmxml] Representation

2002-08-16 Thread RCA
pedigree. REPRESENTATIONs are not "only encodings of the source that can be stored and transmitted" electronically. Hope this helps. RCA - Original Message - From: Hans Fugal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 10:41 PM Sub

[gdmxml] Representation

2002-08-15 Thread Hans Fugal
After about 5 weeks I'm finally getting back to this. I hope everyone else's minds are less clouded over than my own. :) I have addressed all the elements of the evidence submodel to my liking with the exception of representation. I have a few questions for the members of the LWG out there, as