Goodness, I must be getting bounce-happy. Sorry about that. Good thing I
didn't expose any secret passwords or anything...
Hans :)
* Hans Fugal [Fri, 12 Jul 2002 at 10:56 -0600]
> Hi Beau, I will write more later - I have to get out the door in a
> minute. Was this intended to be off-list? Ma
Actually, it clarifies it in my mind. I think what you described is
exactly what I was thinking. I like the name catalog as well.
I think that for a database implementation (which the GDM itself is not)
and also for this xml implementation (although not strictly necessary) I
will go with that
Hi Beau, I will write more later - I have to get out the door in a
minute. Was this intended to be off-list? May I bounce it to the list?
Hans :)
* Beau Sharbrough [Fri, 12 Jul 2002 at 11:26 -0500]
> Hans,
>
> This has been a fruitful discussion, I think. If I could offer a few
> thoughts fr
Hans,
This has been a fruitful discussion, I think. If I could offer a few
thoughts from a LWG perspective (even though Velke and Anderson know a great
deal more than I do about it)
* The GDM was never mean to be a database design. I know that you've said
that many times but it bears repeati
