On 18 November 2010 10:16, Colomban Wendling wrote:
> Le 17/11/2010 23:09, Lex Trotman a écrit :
>> On 18 November 2010 03:36, Colomban Wendling
>> wrote:
>>> Le 17/11/2010 02:17, Lex Trotman a écrit :
> It would need the plugin to something like "dynamically load Geany",
> while assumin
On 18 November 2010 11:10, Colomban Wendling wrote:
> Le 17/11/2010 23:45, Enrico Tröger a écrit :
>> On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 09:34:03 +1100, Lex wrote:
>>
>>> On 18 November 2010 04:05, Colomban Wendling
>>> wrote:
Le 17/11/2010 15:54, Nick Treleaven a écrit :
> On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 17:32:01
On 18 November 2010 10:43, Thomas Martitz
wrote:
> On 17.11.2010 23:29, Enrico Tröger wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 19:52:40 +1100, Lex wrote:
>>
>> Hey,
>>
>> I don't want to go too deep into this discussion, just my cents:
>>
>> To keep it shorter, I'm 100% agree with Colomban's statements.
>
Le 17/11/2010 23:45, Enrico Tröger a écrit :
> On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 09:34:03 +1100, Lex wrote:
>
>> On 18 November 2010 04:05, Colomban Wendling
>> wrote:
>>> Le 17/11/2010 15:54, Nick Treleaven a écrit :
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 17:32:01 +0100
Simone Pellegrini wrote:
> I really li
2010/11/18 Enrico Tröger :
> On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 09:55:35 +1100, Lex wrote:
>
>>2010/11/18 Enrico Tröger :
>>> On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 19:52:40 +1100, Lex wrote:
>>>
>>> Hey,
>>>
>>> I don't want to go too deep into this discussion, just my cents:
>>>
>>> To keep it shorter, I'm 100% agree with Colomba
On 17.11.2010 23:29, Enrico Tröger wrote:
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 19:52:40 +1100, Lex wrote:
Hey,
I don't want to go too deep into this discussion, just my cents:
To keep it shorter, I'm 100% agree with Colomban's statements.
I also 100% agree. Plugin development shouldn't be a PITA.
The curre
On 18.11.2010 00:31, Enrico Tröger wrote:
I do agree.
It was not to hide the discussion or anything.
I was just making some changes to the plugins' build system or tested
something or whatever and stumpled upon the error.
So I made the little patch, sent it to Frank and added a note that even
af
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 00:14:20 +0100, Thomas wrote:
>On 15.11.2010 22:58, Enrico Tröger wrote:
>>
>> I talked with Frank about this already in a private mail, also
>> joining a patch to integrate it in the autotools build. Now he has
>> two patches to choose :).
>
>IMO you (core) developers talk too
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 09:55:35 +1100, Lex wrote:
>2010/11/18 Enrico Tröger :
>> On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 19:52:40 +1100, Lex wrote:
>>
>> Hey,
>>
>> I don't want to go too deep into this discussion, just my cents:
>>
>> To keep it shorter, I'm 100% agree with Colomban's statements.
>>
>>
>>>As Geany is g
Le 17/11/2010 23:09, Lex Trotman a écrit :
> On 18 November 2010 03:36, Colomban Wendling
> wrote:
>> Le 17/11/2010 02:17, Lex Trotman a écrit :
It would need the plugin to something like "dynamically load Geany",
while assuming that Geany has an unstable API. This is IMHO really
c
On 15.11.2010 22:58, Enrico Tröger wrote:
I talked with Frank about this already in a private mail, also joining a
patch to integrate it in the autotools build. Now he has two patches to
choose :).
IMO you (core) developers talk too much in private sometimes. The
development process, includin
2010/11/18 Enrico Tröger :
> On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 19:52:40 +1100, Lex wrote:
>
> Hey,
>
> I don't want to go too deep into this discussion, just my cents:
>
> To keep it shorter, I'm 100% agree with Colomban's statements.
>
>
>>As Geany is getting more and more functionality in plugins there needs
>
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 09:34:03 +1100, Lex wrote:
>On 18 November 2010 04:05, Colomban Wendling
> wrote:
>> Le 17/11/2010 15:54, Nick Treleaven a écrit :
>>> On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 17:32:01 +0100
>>> Simone Pellegrini wrote:
>>>
I really like geany as it uses scintilla, the only feature I feel
>>>
On 18 November 2010 04:05, Colomban Wendling wrote:
> Le 17/11/2010 15:54, Nick Treleaven a écrit :
>> On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 17:32:01 +0100
>> Simone Pellegrini wrote:
>>
>>> I really like geany as it uses scintilla, the only feature I feel is
>>> missing is the intellisense like code competition f
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 19:52:40 +1100, Lex wrote:
Hey,
I don't want to go too deep into this discussion, just my cents:
To keep it shorter, I'm 100% agree with Colomban's statements.
>As Geany is getting more and more functionality in plugins there needs
>to be more thought in general about the n
On 18 November 2010 04:49, Frank Lanitz wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 19:52:40 +1100
> Lex Trotman wrote:
>
>> >
>> > This is not existing in a general view. Also I'm not 100% sure where
>> > this would make sense as you should always you up to date API.
>> > Maybe you can bring a litle light into
On 18 November 2010 03:36, Colomban Wendling wrote:
> Le 17/11/2010 02:17, Lex Trotman a écrit :
>>> It would need the plugin to something like "dynamically load Geany",
>>> while assuming that Geany has an unstable API. This is IMHO really
>>> complicated to deal with correctly, and I don't think
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 17:36:21 +0100
Colomban Wendling wrote:
> Le 17/11/2010 02:17, Lex Trotman a écrit :
> >> It would need the plugin to something like "dynamically load
> >> Geany", while assuming that Geany has an unstable API. This is
> >> IMHO really complicated to deal with correctly, and I
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 19:52:40 +1100
Lex Trotman wrote:
> >
> > This is not existing in a general view. Also I'm not 100% sure where
> > this would make sense as you should always you up to date API.
> > Maybe you can bring a litle light into darkness with an example.
> >
>
> Frank,
>
> As Geany
Le 17/11/2010 15:54, Nick Treleaven a écrit :
> On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 17:32:01 +0100
> Simone Pellegrini wrote:
>
>> I really like geany as it uses scintilla, the only feature I feel is
>> missing is the intellisense like code competition for C++. I would like
>> to ask if anyone is working on a
Le 17/11/2010 02:17, Lex Trotman a écrit :
>> It would need the plugin to something like "dynamically load Geany",
>> while assuming that Geany has an unstable API. This is IMHO really
>> complicated to deal with correctly, and I don't think that not having to
>> recompile a plugin is a sufficient
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 17:32:01 +0100
Simone Pellegrini wrote:
> I really like geany as it uses scintilla, the only feature I feel is
> missing is the intellisense like code competition for C++. I would like
> to ask if anyone is working on a better code competition for C++. I am
> not talking ab
>
> This is not existing in a general view. Also I'm not 100% sure where
> this would make sense as you should always you up to date API. Maybe you
> can bring a litle light into darkness with an example.
>
Frank,
As Geany is getting more and more functionality in plugins there needs
to be more t
Am 17.11.2010 01:03, schrieb Lex Trotman:
> On 17 November 2010 10:22, Colomban Wendling
> wrote:
>> Le 16/11/2010 23:32, Lex Trotman a écrit :
>>> On 17 November 2010 03:11, Frank Lanitz wrote:
>>> Just a question, shouldn't plugins be checking the ABI version was
>>> what they conpiled with no
Am 17.11.2010 00:22, schrieb Colomban Wendling:
> Le 16/11/2010 23:32, Lex Trotman a écrit :
>> On 17 November 2010 03:11, Frank Lanitz wrote:
>>> On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 15:13:03 +0100
>>> Colomban Wendling wrote:
>>>
Le 16/11/2010 09:23, Frank Lanitz a écrit :
> Well, agreed. In most cases
Am 16.11.2010 23:32, schrieb Lex Trotman:
> On 17 November 2010 03:11, Frank Lanitz wrote:
>> On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 15:13:03 +0100
>> Colomban Wendling wrote:
>>
>>> Le 16/11/2010 09:23, Frank Lanitz a écrit :
Well, agreed. In most cases it should work fine with compiled in
version number
26 matches
Mail list logo
