On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 09:59:45 +1100
Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe you should contact Matthew, during a conversation we had on IRC
he revealed a prototype for manageing all such limited resources, not
just markers, in a consistent manner.
This concerns all plugin developers.
Am 11.03.2012 07:16, schrieb Alexander Petukhov:
So all we need is the initialisation, and probably a common search
routine for the convenience of plugins (although that isn't absolutely
needed). The smaller the patch the more likely someone has time to
test it and commit it.
I would
On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 12:33:07 +1100
Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think much is needed:
1. Scintilla already provides the special symbol SC_MARK_AVAILABLE to
indicate that the mark is available.
I already replied to this [1]. Unless we want each plugin to allocate
it's markers
On 12 March 2012 06:25, Dimitar Zhekov dimitar.zhe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 12:33:07 +1100
Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think much is needed:
1. Scintilla already provides the special symbol SC_MARK_AVAILABLE to
indicate that the mark is available.
I already
On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 17:43:16 +0400
Alexander Petukhov de...@apetukhov.ru wrote:
utils_ui_get_marker(), utils_ui_free_marker().
Is it going with these new functions?
Nothing is going on, the thread died.
I started with SF bug about markers and also came up to that having
such
So all we need is the initialisation, and probably a common search
routine for the convenience of plugins (although that isn't absolutely
needed). The smaller the patch the more likely someone has time to
test it and commit it.
I would vote for having utility functions that manages a list
On 11 March 2012 17:16, Alexander Petukhov de...@apetukhov.ru wrote:
So all we need is the initialisation, and probably a common search
routine for the convenience of plugins (although that isn't absolutely
needed). The smaller the patch the more likely someone has time to
test it and commit
On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 08:23:41 +1100
Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
My personal preference would be some shared static function that
any plugin using markers could access.
A simple ui_utils function to find and return the first available
marker based on SC_MARK_AVAILABLE would
On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 13:08:14 +
WILLIAM FRASER william.fra...@virgin.net wrote:
There is a problem as I understand it with checking for the
SC_MARK_AVAILABLE marker to see if a marker is available...
Markers seem by default to be set to 0 (SC_MARK_CIRCLE) by scintilla.
By default, all 32
