On 10/04/2011 07:12 PM, Matthew Brush wrote:
Yeah, 2.18 seems to be about right all things considered.
Can someone explain (in one or two sentences) why GTK versions around
2.18 or so are much worse than more recent ones? I haven't really done
anything using GTK yet, however, I am
On 11-10-05 12:15 AM, Alexander Eberspächer wrote:
On 10/04/2011 07:12 PM, Matthew Brush wrote:
Yeah, 2.18 seems to be about right all things considered.
Can someone explain (in one or two sentences) why GTK versions around
2.18 or so are much worse than more recent ones? I haven't really
Le 05/10/2011 09:30, Lex Trotman a écrit :
Hi Alex,
There is no problem (that I'm aware of) with any versions on Linux,
except of course new features were added over time. Since everyone
wants to use the shiny new things, they want a newer version.
Also as newer features replaced older
On 6 October 2011 09:58, Colomban Wendling lists@herbesfolles.org wrote:
Le 05/10/2011 09:30, Lex Trotman a écrit :
Hi Alex,
There is no problem (that I'm aware of) with any versions on Linux,
except of course new features were added over time. Since everyone
wants to use the shiny new
On 26 September 2011 10:21, Matthew Brush mbr...@codebrainz.ca wrote:
So I was just curious *specifically* what distro(s) and version(s) sets the
oldest version of GTK+ that Geany should support?
I think RHEL in a more or less current version sets a reasonable
benchmark. We have used RHEL 5
On 1 October 2011 13:44, Matthew Brush mbr...@codebrainz.ca wrote:
It seems to me like this group of users would be very small and require that
they are:
- Enterprise/LTS users running a GUI
- And who are willing to install unsupported software.
That may be the case more often than one
On 11-10-04 05:36 AM, Alexander Eberspächer wrote:
On 1 October 2011 13:44, Matthew Brushmbr...@codebrainz.ca wrote:
It seems to me like this group of users would be very small and require that
they are:
- Enterprise/LTS users running a GUI
- And who are willing to install unsupported
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 04:44:06 -0700, Matthew wrote:
On 11-10-01 03:05 AM, Enrico Tröger wrote:
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 01:21:59 -0700, Matthew wrote:
So I was just curious *specifically* what distro(s) and version(s)
sets the oldest version of GTK+ that Geany should support?
I don't know
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 13:44, Matthew Brush mbr...@codebrainz.ca wrote:
On 11-10-01 03:05 AM, Enrico Tröger wrote:
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 01:21:59 -0700, Matthew wrote:
So I was just curious *specifically* what distro(s) and version(s)
sets the oldest version of GTK+ that Geany should support?
To summarise, everyone appears to be in furious agreement :)
Now 0.21 is out, Matthew, whats the oldest version where all the
things used in the current Geany are supported, 2.16 or 2.18.
And can you and Nick test with windows to decide which version we
package with Geany. I don't have a full
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 01:21:59 -0700, Matthew wrote:
Hi,
Is there some specific distro or platform that sets the oldest GTK+
version Geany needs to support? I had a conversation with Enrico on
IRC some time back and he explained that Geany supports older GTK+
versions so that enterprise and
2011/10/1 Enrico Tröger enrico.troe...@uvena.de:
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 01:21:59 -0700, Matthew wrote:
Hi,
Is there some specific distro or platform that sets the oldest GTK+
version Geany needs to support? I had a conversation with Enrico on
IRC some time back and he explained that Geany
Hi,
Is there some specific distro or platform that sets the oldest GTK+
version Geany needs to support? I had a conversation with Enrico on IRC
some time back and he explained that Geany supports older GTK+ versions
so that enterprise and similar distros which have really old packages
are
On 26 September 2011 18:21, Matthew Brush mbr...@codebrainz.ca wrote:
Hi,
Is there some specific distro or platform that sets the oldest GTK+ version
Geany needs to support? I had a conversation with Enrico on IRC some time
back and he explained that Geany supports older GTK+ versions so
14 matches
Mail list logo
