On Sun, 1 May 2011 10:46:59 +1000
Lex Trotman wrote:
> > Maybe Compiled/Interpreted would have been Ok actually. But for now I
> > decided to just revert to Programming/Scripting.
>
> Ok.
>
> I guess there isn't any real perfect solution to this, just to explain
> I see Programming/Scripting as
Hi,
> As I have said before I don't care strongly about the current breakup,
I don't really care neither, but... (read ahead)
> but several people seem to. After some thought I feel that this is
> likely to be that the breakup is subjective.
>
> But the only objective breakup I can think of is
On 1 May 2011 14:35, Lex Trotman wrote:
> On 1 May 2011 14:08, Matthew Brush wrote:
>> On 04/30/11 05:36, Nick Treleaven wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 22:22:52 +1000
>>> Lex Trotman wrote:
>>>
> Ok. If others mostly dislike the current grouping and can agree on a
> better alternativ
On 1 May 2011 14:08, Matthew Brush wrote:
> On 04/30/11 05:36, Nick Treleaven wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 22:22:52 +1000
>> Lex Trotman wrote:
>>
Ok. If others mostly dislike the current grouping and can agree on a
better alternative (one without long menus) I don't mind switching.
On 04/30/11 05:36, Nick Treleaven wrote:
On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 22:22:52 +1000
Lex Trotman wrote:
Ok. If others mostly dislike the current grouping and can agree on a
better alternative (one without long menus) I don't mind switching.
Hi Nick, I think the grouping is not too bad, although as I
On 1 May 2011 01:12, Nick Treleaven wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 13:36:45 +0100
> Nick Treleaven wrote:
>
>> > Hi Nick, I think the grouping is not too bad, although as I said
>> > before I don't like "Compiled" as a name, especially when its compiled
>> > vs scripting. But I don't mind strongly
On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 13:36:45 +0100
Nick Treleaven wrote:
> > Hi Nick, I think the grouping is not too bad, although as I said
> > before I don't like "Compiled" as a name, especially when its compiled
> > vs scripting. But I don't mind strongly, its up to general opinion.
>
> I think Compiled i
On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 22:22:52 +1000
Lex Trotman wrote:
> > Ok. If others mostly dislike the current grouping and can agree on a
> > better alternative (one without long menus) I don't mind switching.
>
> Hi Nick, I think the grouping is not too bad, although as I said
> before I don't like "Compi
>
> Ok. If others mostly dislike the current grouping and can agree on a
> better alternative (one without long menus) I don't mind switching.
Hi Nick, I think the grouping is not too bad, although as I said
before I don't like "Compiled" as a name, especially when its compiled
vs scripting. But
On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 02:39:09 -0700
Matthew Brush wrote:
> On 04/29/11 09:06, Nick Treleaven wrote:
> > On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 20:13:05 -0700
> > Matthew Brush wrote:
> >
> >> I'm sure you can see what I mean, there's a lot of gray area using the
> >> term Compiled, since many languages can either b
On Fri, 29 Apr 2011 23:23:45 -0700
Matthew Brush wrote:
> >>> - I believe LaTex, Markdown, and reStructuredText are Markup Languages.
> >>
> >> Good point also, and txt2tags.
> >
> > And YAML. Now done.
> >
>
> Heh. I actually had put YAML in the above list, but I removed it while
> revising m
On 04/29/11 09:06, Nick Treleaven wrote:
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 20:13:05 -0700
Matthew Brush wrote:
I'm sure you can see what I mean, there's a lot of gray area using the
term Compiled, since many languages can either be compiled to machine
code, interpreted by a VM/runtime, compiled then interpr
On 04/29/11 09:34, Nick Treleaven wrote:
On Fri, 29 Apr 2011 17:06:46 +0100
Nick Treleaven wrote:
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 20:13:05 -0700
Matthew Brush wrote:
- I generally wouldn't consider CSS a markup language, but it probably
technically is. IMHO it would be more apt to put it under Miscell
On Fri, 29 Apr 2011 14:26:35 +1000
Lex Trotman wrote:
> And to add one, why is R a script and all others in that menu source,
> since its the scripting menu?
Now changed to source file.
Regards,
Nick
___
Geany-devel mailing list
Geany-devel@uvena.de
h
On Fri, 29 Apr 2011 17:06:46 +0100
Nick Treleaven wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 20:13:05 -0700
> Matthew Brush wrote:
>
> filetype names are not translated IIRC.
Although the *title* is translated, which is what we were talking about
(oops).
> > There's also a few other quirks I've noticed in
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 20:13:05 -0700
Matthew Brush wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just noticed the change[1] in wording of the set filetypes menu which
> was something that had (slightly) bothered me before, since I personally
> consider most of the scripting languages as programming languages as
> well.
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 21:09:18 -0700
Matthew Brush wrote:
> I missed the the commit[1] before the previous one I mentioned, which is
> a pretty cool feature if it does what I think it does. Is this
> documented yet or is still a work in progress? Is it meant to let the
> user reorganize/rename
> Is there a (scintilla) lexer for reStructuredText? With a quick look at
> lexer names, I didn't see one.
No, the ReST filetype does not have syntax highlighting.
>
> With that same quick look, I came across the lexer LexTxt2tags.cxx and
> looked at that a little--it looks like some of the stuf
On Friday 29 April 2011 12:26:35 am Lex Trotman wrote:
> Hey Matthew,
> > - I believe LaTex, Markdown, and reStructuredText are Markup
> > Languages.
Is there a (scintilla) lexer for reStructuredText? With a quick look at
lexer names, I didn't see one.
With that same quick look, I came across t
Hey Matthew,
[...]
> I'm not sure that the word "Compiled" is the best choice though, since it's
> kind of vague:
>
> Is Vala a compiled language because it's compiled into C code?
> Is Python *not* compiled because it's compiled into bytecode?
> Is Java a compiled language?
Java is if you use G
I missed the the commit[1] before the previous one I mentioned, which is
a pretty cool feature if it does what I think it does. Is this
documented yet or is still a work in progress? Is it meant to let the
user reorganize/rename the menu items in the Set Filetypes menu?
I notice the default
Hi,
I just noticed the change[1] in wording of the set filetypes menu which
was something that had (slightly) bothered me before, since I personally
consider most of the scripting languages as programming languages as
well. I'm not sure that the word "Compiled" is the best choice though,
sin
22 matches
Mail list logo
