Am 04.06.2010 03:27, schrieb Lex Trotman:
Yep, and I wasn't interested in multi instance either until I realised
that it allows me to have Geany on multiple screens, I do lot of
switching back and forth between .hpp and .cpp files so showing them
both would be a*big* help.
How about a proper
On 10 June 2010 07:50, Thomas Martitz
thomas.mart...@student.htw-berlin.de wrote:
Am 04.06.2010 03:27, schrieb Lex Trotman:
Yep, and I wasn't interested in multi instance either until I realised
that it allows me to have Geany on multiple screens, I do lot of
switching back and forth between
On Sun, 30 May 2010 22:43:54 +0400, Eugene wrote:
Or, as another option, we can remove automatic saving of
preferences when closing. As preferences are saved immediately
after Preferences dialog is closed, this option wouldn't do
any harm. Or would it?
The historical
2010/6/3 Enrico Tröger enrico.troe...@uvena.de:
On Sun, 30 May 2010 22:43:54 +0400, Eugene wrote:
Or, as another option, we can remove automatic saving of
preferences when closing. As preferences are saved immediately
after Preferences dialog is closed, this option wouldn't do
On Thu, 20 May 2010 22:52:49 +0400, Eugene wrote:
Hey,
sorry for the delay, I just don't manage to keep up with this stuff :(.
Or, as another option, we can remove automatic saving of
preferences when closing. As preferences are saved immediately
after Preferences dialog is closed,
On Sun, 30 May 2010 19:36:14 +0200%
Enrico Tröger enrico.troe...@uvena.de wrote:
On Thu, 20 May 2010 22:52:49 +0400, Eugene wrote:
Hey,
sorry for the delay, I just don't manage to keep up with this
stuff :(.
No problem.
Or, as another option, we can remove automatic saving of
On Wed, 19 May 2010 22:13:40 +0400
Eugene Arshinov earshi...@gmail.com wrote:
Or, as another option, we can remove automatic saving of
preferences when closing.
I second that.
As preferences are saved immediately after Preferences dialog is
closed, this option wouldn't do any harm. Or would
On Wed, 19 May 2010 23:05:26 +0200%
Enrico Tröger enrico.troe...@uvena.de wrote:
On Wed, 19 May 2010 22:13:40 +0400, Eugene wrote:
On Wed, 19 May 2010 14:09:57 +0300%
Dimitar Zhekov hams...@mbox.contact.bg wrote:
On Wed, 19 May 2010 11:07:09 +0400
Eugene Arshinov
On Tue, 2 Mar 2010 15:23:31 +0300%
Eugene Arshinov earshi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 1 Mar 2010 16:08:18 +%
Nick Treleaven nick.trelea...@btinternet.com wrote:
On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 09:05:12 +1100
Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote:
To be easy to implement, perhaps maybe only
On Wed, 19 May 2010 11:07:09 +0400
Eugene Arshinov earshi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 2 Mar 2010 15:23:31 +0300%
Eugene Arshinov earshi...@gmail.com wrote:
Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote:
If so then I assume all Geany commands
without the -i will be the same instance, and
On Sun, 07 Mar 2010 01:17:03 +0100, Thomas wrote:
On 05.03.2010 22:49, Dominic Hopf wrote:
Am Freitag, den 05.03.2010, 16:54 + schrieb Nick Treleaven:
On Tue, 02 Mar 2010 18:50:28 +0100
Thomas Martitzthomas.mart...@student.htw-berlin.de wrote:
(If a second instance of geany
On Mon, 1 Mar 2010 08:21:43 +1100, Lex wrote:
2010/3/1 Enrico Tröger enrico.troe...@uvena.de
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 15:15:02 +, Nick wrote:
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 12:04:20 +0300
Eugene Arshinov earshi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all.
When several instances of Geany quit in the same time,
On 05.03.2010 22:49, Dominic Hopf wrote:
Am Freitag, den 05.03.2010, 16:54 + schrieb Nick Treleaven:
On Tue, 02 Mar 2010 18:50:28 +0100
Thomas Martitzthomas.mart...@student.htw-berlin.de wrote:
(If a second instance of geany is run without passing filenames to the
first, -i is
On Tue, 02 Mar 2010 18:50:28 +0100
Thomas Martitz thomas.mart...@student.htw-berlin.de wrote:
(If a second instance of geany is run without passing filenames to the
first, -i is implied).
I really like this idea. It is simple to understand, rather
convenient and uniform with the
On 02.03.2010 13:23, Eugene Arshinov wrote:
(If a second instance of geany is run without passing filenames to the
first, -i is implied).
I really like this idea. It is simple to understand, rather
convenient and uniform with the behaviour of new-instances, i.e.,
those instances should
On Tue, 02 Mar 2010 18:50:28 +0100%
Thomas Martitz thomas.mart...@student.htw-berlin.de wrote:
On 02.03.2010 13:23, Eugene Arshinov wrote:
(If a second instance of geany is run without passing filenames to
the first, -i is implied).
I really like this idea. It is simple to
On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 09:05:12 +1100
Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote:
To be easy to implement, perhaps maybe only the first/main instance
should save settings. We could have a Tools-Save Config menu item
enabled for the first instance to allow the user to restart other
instances with the
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 15:15:02 +, Nick wrote:
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 12:04:20 +0300
Eugene Arshinov earshi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all.
When several instances of Geany quit in the same time, there is a
high possibility of a conflict. I can reproduce it easily on my
machine, using either
2010/3/1 Enrico Tröger enrico.troe...@uvena.de
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 15:15:02 +, Nick wrote:
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 12:04:20 +0300
Eugene Arshinov earshi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all.
When several instances of Geany quit in the same time, there is a
high possibility of a conflict. I
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 12:04:20 +0300
Eugene Arshinov earshi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all.
When several instances of Geany quit in the same time, there is a high
possibility of a conflict. I can reproduce it easily on my machine,
using either trunk or SM version.
To reproduce: open three
I haven't paid careful attention to this thread, but on several projects
I've worked on, we've adopted a last to save, wins philosophy for
situations (somewhat) similar to this.
I've learned to deal with that in several applications including nedit,
and it seems to be a reasonable approach,
On 27 February 2010 02:15, Nick Treleaven nick.trelea...@btinternet.comwrote:
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 12:04:20 +0300
Eugene Arshinov earshi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all.
When several instances of Geany quit in the same time, there is a high
possibility of a conflict. I can reproduce it
On 27 February 2010 03:36, Randy Kramer rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
I haven't paid careful attention to this thread, but on several projects
I've worked on, we've adopted a last to save, wins philosophy for
situations (somewhat) similar to this.
I've learned to deal with that in several
23 matches
Mail list logo
