On Wed, 19 May 2010 22:13:40 +0400
Eugene Arshinov earshi...@gmail.com wrote:
Or, as another option, we can remove automatic saving of
preferences when closing.
I second that.
As preferences are saved immediately after Preferences dialog is
closed, this option wouldn't do any harm. Or would
On Thu, 20 May 2010 19:05:24 +1000
Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe I missed something, but what happens to configuration under this plan
when instances are manually closed and re-opened?
Which of the .conf files is used when the first is manually opened, the
second is manually
On 20 May 2010 19:46, Dimitar Zhekov hams...@mbox.contact.bg wrote:
On Thu, 20 May 2010 19:05:24 +1000
Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe I missed something, but what happens to configuration under this
plan
when instances are manually closed and re-opened?
Which of the .conf
On Thu, 20 May 2010 19:50:49 +1000
Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote:
The x11 session .conf files are used only temporarily when a geany is
stopped/started by the session manager. Everything else remains as is.
So I take that to mean the session of the first will be used??
But don't
On Thu, 20 May 2010 20:32:37 +1000
Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote:
No, no. The .geany files names used include the SM client id, which is
unique for each program (normally UUID-s).
small mistake: s/.geany files/.conf files/
The whole idea is that each Geany saves itself, without any
On Thu, 20 May 2010 23:05:59 +1000
Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
As I said above I'm no longer interested in what happens when a session is
continued, what happens when I close things manually, and then start new
instances of Geany.
[...]
Clearly these don't use sm specific
On Wed, 19 May 2010 23:05:26 +0200%
Enrico Tröger enrico.troe...@uvena.de wrote:
On Wed, 19 May 2010 22:13:40 +0400, Eugene wrote:
On Wed, 19 May 2010 14:09:57 +0300%
Dimitar Zhekov hams...@mbox.contact.bg wrote:
On Wed, 19 May 2010 11:07:09 +0400
Eugene Arshinov
On Fri, 21 May 2010 14:34:36 +1000%
Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I've created this thread separate from Eugene's and Ditmar's session
management threads because my concern is mostly about other parts of
Geany and I don't want to be seen as criticising either of them as it
