Lex Trotman schrieb:
Hi Thomas,
Good to hear that there are no major problems.
I can see that you may want to kill a long build that you started by
accident or when you realise you forgot to do something first. I've
done that more than once ;-)
In Geany execute changes to stop while running,
2009/8/16 Thomas Martitz thomas.mart...@student.htw-berlin.de:
Lex Trotman schrieb:
Hi Thomas,
Good to hear that there are no major problems.
I can see that you may want to kill a long build that you started by
accident or when you realise you forgot to do something first. I've
done that
2009/8/17 Thomas Martitz thomas.mart...@student.htw-berlin.de:
Lex Trotman schrieb:
2009/8/16 Thomas Martitz thomas.mart...@student.htw-berlin.de:
Lex Trotman schrieb:
Hi Thomas,
Good to hear that there are no major problems.
I can see that you may want to kill a long build that you
Hi there,
I just try to include sciwrappers.h into my header and when I compile I get
a lot of strange errors like that :
sciwrappers.h:34: error: expected ‘=’, ‘,’, ‘;’, ‘asm’ or ‘__attribute__’
before ‘-’ token
All the lines with a glib type (gchar, gboolean, ...) have that error and I
really
Hi,
we are happy to announce a new release of Geany!
For a comprehensive list of changes in Geany 0.18, please see
http://www.geany.org/Documentation/ReleaseNotes. A very detailed and
complete list of changes can be found in the ChangeLog, included in the
source packages as well as in the
On Sun, 16 Aug 2009 21:11:51 +0200, Cédric wrote:
Hi,
answering your mails is hard the way you quote.
About your initial question abut including sciwrappers.h:
the order of header includes is important, I think I already told
you that in another thread.
First include geany.h, then other Geany
Hello Enrico,
Thanks for replying. I didn't understand how it was working, since I
directly open the sciwrappers.h file :-) It's all right now !
Regards,
Cedric
2009/8/16 Enrico Tröger enrico.troe...@uvena.de
On Sun, 16 Aug 2009 21:11:51 +0200, Cédric wrote:
Hi,
answering your mails is
Enrico Tröger schrieb:
On Sun, 16 Aug 2009 21:11:51 +0200, Cédric wrote:
Hi,
answering your mails is hard the way you quote.
About your initial question abut including sciwrappers.h:
the order of header includes is important, I think I already told
you that in another thread.
First include
Enrico Tröger schrieb:
On Sun, 16 Aug 2009 23:14:19 +0200, Colomban wrote:
I think I've been misunderstood quite a bit, sorry.
No, I'm not against single-header policy, even if I think is cleaner
to include only what I need when possible, but for a library (like
GTK+), for sure I see the
2009/8/17 Thomas Martitz thomas.mart...@student.htw-berlin.de:
Lex Trotman schrieb:
Killing is done in the client (the snippet came from rbclient.rb). The
server just sends a message CANCEL, the client in turn calls killchild.
Ok, which is client and which is server is not well defined :-)
2009/8/17 Enrico Tröger enrico.troe...@uvena.de:
On Sun, 16 Aug 2009 11:02:06 +1000, Lex wrote:
Sure
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=591526
Ok, the bug report hasn't many comments except the duplicate note and
the other bug also doesn't give much more clue.
Anyway, it seems to be
Lex Trotman schrieb:
2009/8/17 Thomas Martitz thomas.mart...@student.htw-berlin.de:
Lex Trotman schrieb:
Killing is done in the client (the snippet came from rbclient.rb). The
server just sends a message CANCEL, the client in turn calls killchild.
Ok, which is client and
I think we agree but are saying it differently. Let me re-state it
from scratch.
1. Killing all the child build processes is significant but not
impossible work and implementing it in C isn't very portable.
2. Even if we were willing to do the work involved in 1, killing a
build is risky because
13 matches
Mail list logo
