Re: [Geany-devel] Include auto_brace_check_dup patch?

2010-02-13 Thread Enrico Tröger
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 14:05:33 +0100, Harold wrote: 2010/1/12 Enrico Tröger enrico.troe...@uvena.de: Good point. If I don't forget it, I'll commit the patch later this week (probably at the weekend), so it gets a more wider testing and ideally a followup patch to fix the remaining issues.

Re: [Geany-devel] Project-specific long line marker position

2010-02-13 Thread Enrico Tröger
On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 03:45:15 +0100, Dominic wrote: Am Donnerstag, den 11.02.2010, 22:58 +0300 schrieb Eugene Arshinov: Hi all. I usually limit line length by 80 in my own projects, but in Geany 100 symbols is recommended. If the long line marker position preference was project-specific, I

Re: [Geany-devel] Build system branch 2.0

2010-02-13 Thread Enrico Tröger
On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 05:53:59 +0100, Thomas wrote: OT: I'm still thinking that - if Geany wants to call itself an IDE - we I think we all agree Geany isn't a real IDE and I think that's fine. Geany might be just an advanced text editor or whatever. And then, these are just terms, what counts

Re: [Geany-devel] Build system branch 2.0

2010-02-13 Thread Enrico Tröger
On Sat, 6 Feb 2010 21:21:03 +1100, Lex wrote: Heya guys, since we have quite different ideas of the future of the whole build systems features and in particular about its configuration using GUI dialogs, I got a weird idea: Why not moving the build system code into a plugin? This isn't

Re: [Geany-devel] Build system branch 2.0

2010-02-13 Thread Dominic Hopf
Am Samstag, den 13.02.2010, 16:58 +0100 schrieb Enrico Tröger: On Sat, 6 Feb 2010 21:21:03 +1100, Lex wrote: Heya guys, since we have quite different ideas of the future of the whole build systems features and in particular about its configuration using GUI dialogs, I got a weird idea:

Re: [Geany-devel] Project-specific long line marker position

2010-02-13 Thread Frank Lanitz
On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 03:45:15 +0100 Dominic Hopf dma...@googlemail.com wrote: I really think this feature would make sense for me too, so I'd appreciate this too, but I also don't consider it as that important, it's more a nice-to-have than a must-have for me. :) I agree. Cheers, Frank --

Re: [Geany-devel] Build system branch 2.0

2010-02-13 Thread Frank Lanitz
Hi, On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 16:58:34 +0100 Enrico Tröger enrico.troe...@uvena.de wrote: On Sat, 6 Feb 2010 21:21:03 +1100, Lex wrote: since we have quite different ideas of the future of the whole build systems features and in particular about its configuration using GUI dialogs, I got a

Re: [Geany-devel] Build system branch 2.0

2010-02-13 Thread Lex Trotman
Hi Enrico, 2010/2/14 Enrico Tröger enrico.troe...@uvena.de On Sat, 6 Feb 2010 21:21:03 +1100, Lex wrote: Heya guys, since we have quite different ideas of the future of the whole build systems features and in particular about its configuration using GUI dialogs, I got a weird idea: Why