At revision 4720.
I'm trying to understand the Tools->Configuration Files Edit/Save behavior,
so that I can mimic that in a plugin that does the same thing for template
files. When I select *snippets.conf* from the *Configuration
Files*submenu, and there is no
*snippets.conf* in *~/.config/geany
On 2 March 2010 23:19, Nick Treleaven wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Mar 2010 15:23:24 +1100
> Lex Trotman wrote:
>
> > I've just merged trunk into bs2 branch and of course got a conflict on
> the
> > Changelog file.
> >
> > What was the decision on what to do with branch changelogs, I can't
> > remember?
>
On Tue, 2 Mar 2010 22:40:48 +0300
Eugene Arshinov wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Mar 2010 20:25:50 +0300%
> Dimitar Zhekov wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2 Mar 2010 16:02:48 +0300
> > Eugene Arshinov wrote:
> >
> > In short, save .conf files instead of "geany.conf". That
> > will not save any global options, so if
On Tue, 2 Mar 2010 20:25:50 +0300%
Dimitar Zhekov wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Mar 2010 16:02:48 +0300
> Eugene Arshinov wrote:
>
> > I'm not sure I understand you message correctly, but the problem I
> > described is about saving the global Geany settings, not about the
> > way how to pass instances' se
On Tue, 2 Mar 2010 16:02:48 +0300
Eugene Arshinov wrote:
> I'm not sure I understand you message correctly, but the problem I
> described is about saving the global Geany settings, not about the way
> how to pass instances' settings "across restarts".
In short, save .conf files instead of "geany
On Tue, 2 Mar 2010 16:14:29 +0300
Eugene Arshinov wrote:
> > [...]
> > Now that I think of it, with "Project Based Session Files" always on,
> > and when no project is open, on "Save Yourself" geany SM could create
> > a .geany file in the session directory and store the file
> > list there. [...
On Tue, 02 Mar 2010 18:50:28 +0100%
Thomas Martitz wrote:
> On 02.03.2010 13:23, Eugene Arshinov wrote:
> >> (If a second instance of geany is run without passing filenames to
> >> the first, -i is implied).
> >>
> >>
> > I really like this idea. It is simple to understand, rather
> > conve
On 02.03.2010 13:23, Eugene Arshinov wrote:
(If a second instance of geany is run without passing filenames to the
first, -i is implied).
I really like this idea. It is simple to understand, rather
convenient and uniform with the behaviour of "new-instances", i.e.,
those instances should
From e30c823ba903423fcaf26c6e9bc58ea27db8585f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Can Koy
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 15:27:45 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Salvage focus in Filebrowser plugin.
When Filebrowser is visible and Switch to Sidebar shortcut is issued, the focus ends up on plugin's toolbar. The
On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 22:48:46 +0300%
Dimitar Zhekov wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 21:58:38 +0300
> Eugene Arshinov wrote:
>
> > Hmm..., here you describe the behaviour when that check button is
> > *checked*, right? I have it checked too, so I know this behaviour. I
> > didn't know what Geany do
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 20:11:43 +0300%
Dimitar Zhekov wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 12:04:20 +0300
> Eugene Arshinov wrote:
>
> > When several instances of Geany quit in the same time, there is a
> > high possibility of a conflict. [...]
> >
> > I can see two solutions for this problem. [...]
> >
On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 09:05:12 +1100%
Lex Trotman wrote:
>
> As I implied in my comment on another message, my use case was to
> have the filemanager programmed to start a new instance if I double
> click to look at a file so it doesn't interfere with my "main"
> instance. I know the socket system
On Sun, 28 Feb 2010 16:05:10 +0100%
Enrico Tröger wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 01:46:08 +0300, Eugene wrote:
>
> >Hi all.
> >
> >I have a bunch of little questions, some of them are not even related
> >to Geany. Here they are:
> >
> >1. There is a little issue with "Automatically continue block
On Mon, 1 Mar 2010 16:08:18 +%
Nick Treleaven wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 09:05:12 +1100
> Lex Trotman wrote:
>
> > > To be easy to implement, perhaps maybe only the first/main
> > > instance should save settings. We could have a Tools->Save Config
> > > menu item enabled for the first ins
On Tue, 2 Mar 2010 15:23:24 +1100
Lex Trotman wrote:
> I've just merged trunk into bs2 branch and of course got a conflict on the
> Changelog file.
>
> What was the decision on what to do with branch changelogs, I can't
> remember?
I think for the branch changelog it's up to the branch develope
On Tue, 2 Mar 2010 13:07:55 +1100
Lex Trotman wrote:
> Well, since the question is "Try to resave the file?" I'd suggest that
> GTK_STOCK_YES and GTK_STOCK_NO be used since they are a more direct answer
> to the question than apply/cancel are. And that makes the mnemonics
> different.
>
> What
On Tue, 2 Mar 2010 10:21:27 +1100
Lex Trotman wrote:
> > On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 17:54:31 +
> > Nick Treleaven wrote:
> >
> > > > Makes the plugin much bigger and also requires more of the build
> > >
> > > Makes the core smaller ;-)
> >
> > Probably not by much though.
> >
>
> The build.c in S
On Tue, 2 Mar 2010 13:07:55 +1100%
Lex Trotman wrote:
> On 2 March 2010 09:53, Can Koy wrote:
>
> > OK, you send a patch then.
> >
>
> Well, since the question is "Try to resave the file?" I'd suggest that
> GTK_STOCK_YES and GTK_STOCK_NO be used since they are a more direct
> answer to the qu
18 matches
Mail list logo
