On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 19:46:00 +0200, Jiří wrote:
2010/6/12 Enrico Tröger enrico.troe...@uvena.de:
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 13:33:44 +0200, Jiří wrote:
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 13:05, Nick Treleaven
nick.trelea...@btinternet.com wrote:
On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 21:40:58 +0200
Jiří Techet
On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 20:23:56 +0200, Jiří wrote:
2010/6/12 Enrico Tröger enrico.troe...@uvena.de:
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 09:29:18 +1000, Lex wrote:
Hi Jiri,
I'd recommend that you send your patches as attachments, putting
them in the mail body can get them wrapped.
+1, Nick also said
On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 06:50:57 +0200, Thomas wrote:
Maybe it would be a good idea to find some hosting which also has a
bug tracker, otherwise it would seem strange to stick to sourceforge
for bugs but XY.com for the code hosting. Has anyone tried the
sourceforge git hosting?
Ah, that raises
On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 10:05:26 +1000, Lex wrote:
As I'm looking at potential hosting services for the first time,
Gitorious and Github don't actually look to me to be any more socially
oriented than sourceforge, both seem to emphasise hosting and then
offer other apps as well just like
On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 21:30:24 +0200, Jiří wrote:
This choice will also influence the workflow in which you will use
git. If contributors cannot have their branches hosted easily, then
the the Linus model (one pusher pulling from contributors) will be
harder to realize.
I doubt we want that.
I have a few years of daily experience both with SVN and GIT. We use
SVN at work and I use GIT for all my personal projects. I like GIT
better than SVN.
In my humble opinion you shouldn't switch unless you are unhappy with
sourceforge / svn.
2010/6/13 Enrico Tröger enrico.troe...@uvena.de:
On
On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 14:11:05 +0200%
Frank Lanitz fr...@frank.uvena.de wrote:
On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 14:01:02 +0200
Daniel Marjamäki daniel.marjam...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a few years of daily experience both with SVN and GIT. We use
SVN at work and I use GIT for all my personal projects. I
On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 16:14:57 +0400
Eugene Arshinov earshi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 14:11:05 +0200%
Frank Lanitz fr...@frank.uvena.de wrote:
On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 14:01:02 +0200
Daniel Marjamäki daniel.marjam...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a few years of daily experience
On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 14:17:54 +0200, Frank wrote:
On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 16:14:57 +0400
Eugene Arshinov earshi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 14:11:05 +0200%
Frank Lanitz fr...@frank.uvena.de wrote:
On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 14:01:02 +0200
Daniel Marjamäki
Am 13.06.2010 14:22, schrieb Enrico Tröger:
Well, if Frank doesn't want to and Nick doesn't mind, we maybe can
indeed save us the whole trouble of discussing about switching :).
Btw, my personal opinion on switching or not doesn't count much at all.
The amount of future commits by me will be
Am 13.06.2010 14:11, schrieb Frank Lanitz:
I agree. For our current development process I don't see any big need
to change away from SVN. It will cost a lot of effort with no extra
profit adding.
Are you sure? I don't think it'll cost much, but it would make working
on Geany easier for
On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 13:08:33 +0200
Enrico Tröger enrico.troe...@uvena.de wrote:
On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 10:05:26 +1000, Lex wrote:
As I'm looking at potential hosting services for the first time,
Gitorious and Github don't actually look to me to be any more
socially oriented than
Am 13.06.2010 17:59, schrieb Chow Loong Jin:
Then let's not go the Linus route. We can always adopt a working model
as follows, which I've attempted to translate from the svn workflow as
best as I can:
We host Geany (git) on sourceforge.net. Developers who have push
access (i.e. the ones who
2010/6/13 Enrico Tröger enrico.troe...@uvena.de:
On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 20:23:56 +0200, Jiří wrote:
2010/6/12 Enrico Tröger enrico.troe...@uvena.de:
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 09:29:18 +1000, Lex wrote:
Hi Jiri,
I'd recommend that you send your patches as attachments, putting
them in the mail
Why? If you want to ensure that the sources satisfy some standards,
then it's alright. You use -Wall after all.
Really?
I had a quick look and didn't find any reference. Did I miss anything?
My imagination, apparently ;-).
-Wmissing-prototypes and friends are gcc specific and would
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 14:38, Thomas Martitz
thomas.mart...@student.htw-berlin.de wrote:
Am 13.06.2010 14:22, schrieb Enrico Tröger:
Well, if Frank doesn't want to and Nick doesn't mind, we maybe can
indeed save us the whole trouble of discussing about switching :).
Btw, my personal
On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 23:18:45 +0200
Jiří Techet tec...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 14:38, Thomas Martitz
thomas.mart...@student.htw-berlin.de wrote:
Am 13.06.2010 14:22, schrieb Enrico Tröger:
Well, if Frank doesn't want to and Nick doesn't mind, we maybe can
indeed save us
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 17:59, Chow Loong Jin hyper...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 13:11:43 +0200
Enrico Tröger enrico.troe...@uvena.de wrote:
On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 21:30:24 +0200, Jiří wrote:
This choice will also influence the workflow in which you will use
git. If contributors
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 17:38, Chow Loong Jin hyper...@gmail.com wrote:
Bandwidth issues. If your connection to your git host sucks
(sourceforge.net particularly sucks from Asian countries) then you want
Sourceforge tends to have bad days here too (Czech Republic) - I
suspect it's a global
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 02:59, Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote:
(snip)
See my talk with Dimitar (I know you did, thanks for the hint, I've
completely overlooked that you get GKeyFile as the parameter) - my
thinking about how to integrate my project management to geany has
changed a bit.
Of course, I don't have this version in mind when posting my comments.
Your current version is alright for 0.19.1.
Ok thanks, as you probably can tell I'd rather move on than try to
tart up what I consider to be a fundamentally bad UI.
And as I explained I'm don't like UIs that
save hidden
On 06/12/2010 05:45 AM, Enrico Tröger wrote:
On Mon, 07 Jun 2010 15:47:30 -0500, Brad wrote:
On 06/06/2010 12:33 PM, Enrico Tröger wrote:
On Sat, 05 Jun 2010 09:10:41 -0500, Brad wrote:
So, if anyone has any clue, feel free to share it :).
As said in another mail, the planned release is
On 14 June 2010 10:04, Jiří Techet tec...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 02:59, Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote:
(snip)
See my talk with Dimitar (I know you did, thanks for the hint, I've
completely overlooked that you get GKeyFile as the parameter) - my
thinking about how to
To reply to several previous posts.
* Remotely hosted branches: gitorious.org/github.com can be very
useful for these, no matter how much you hate them. It'd be worth
having a mirror of Geany on gitorious.org/github.com to allow for
users to perform remote-cloning and pushing of
On Fri, 4 Jun 2010 12:13:39 +0400%
Eugene Arshinov earshi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 4 Jun 2010 12:17:38 +1000%
Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4 June 2010 03:11, Dimitar Zhekov dimitar.zhe...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi.
Taking point from the proposition to merge the recent
Am 14.06.2010 03:58, schrieb Lex Trotman:
I guess we should also consider that no matter how easy we think it
will be there will probably be some disruption during the changeover
so it should be now (immediately after a release) or not until the
next release, which I think is probably better so
26 matches
Mail list logo
