On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 23:47:37 +0200, Jiří Techet tec...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 17:38, Chow Loong Jin hyper...@gmail.com wrote:
Bandwidth issues. If your connection to your git host sucks
(sourceforge.net particularly sucks from Asian countries) then you want
Sourceforge
On 14 June 2010 15:41, Thomas Martitz
thomas.mart...@student.htw-berlin.de wrote:
Am 14.06.2010 03:58, schrieb Lex Trotman:
I guess we should also consider that no matter how easy we think it
will be there will probably be some disruption during the changeover
so it should be now (immediately
I cannot answer any of the questions because I also have no experience
in running a git project.
But what I know is that we are actually less depending on a hoster.
Because of git's DVCS nature, everyone has the complete repo locally and
can work offline with it. Git hosting is something for
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 17:47:57 +1000
Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14 June 2010 15:41, Thomas Martitz
thomas.mart...@student.htw-berlin.de wrote:
Am 14.06.2010 03:58, schrieb Lex Trotman:
I guess we should also consider that no matter how easy we think it
will be there will
I think something that might be worth noting is that we should pick a
host that has support http:// fetching, and even better, smart http://.
Good point
* How many people contribute to one, and what hosting service do they
use and what is the experience, is performance consistent and better
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 09:47, Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14 June 2010 15:41, Thomas Martitz
thomas.mart...@student.htw-berlin.de wrote:
Am 14.06.2010 03:58, schrieb Lex Trotman:
I guess we should also consider that no matter how easy we think it
will be there will probably be
I believe I have some relevant info about github. I have a repository
at github. http://www.github.com/danmar/cppcheck
I used sourceforge+svn when I started cppcheck. But then I moved the
code repository to github.
For the code hosting I think github is really good. The code review
features are
Sorry for any noise this post might add! Long response follows.
TL;DR: Use Gitorious and Trac.
On 06/14/2010 12:47 AM, Lex Trotman wrote:
As far as I can tell Jiri is the only one who has responded who has
actual experience running a Git project and that is only on Gitoroius.
So I'd ask:
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 03:26, Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14 June 2010 10:04, Jiří Techet tec...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 02:59, Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote:
(snip)
See my talk with Dimitar (I know you did, thanks for the hint, I've
completely overlooked
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 03:20, Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote:
Of course, I don't have this version in mind when posting my comments.
Your current version is alright for 0.19.1.
Ok thanks, as you probably can tell I'd rather move on than try to
tart up what I consider to be a
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 14:07, Dimitar Zhekov dimitar.zhe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 01:06:34 +0200
Jiří Techet tec...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 19:30, Dimitar Zhekov dimitar.zhe...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 00:17:13 +0200
Yes, it displays the
Hi all,
We are happy to announce the release of Geany Plugins 0.19, which is
targeted to work with Geany 0.19. Tarballs, the Windows setup file, and
their corresponding GPG signatures can be found at
http://plugins.geany.org/geany-plugins
A comprehensive list of changes can be found at
12 matches
Mail list logo