On 9 September 2010 12:40, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> Colomban Wendling wrote:
>
>> Since Glade 2.x doesn't really exist anymore (its out-of-date and
>> couldn't even be compiled with recent GTK version [1]), I don't think it
>> is reasonable to think that every possible contributor have it.
>>
On 9 September 2010 11:15, Colomban Wendling wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Le 09/09/2010 03:02, Erik de Castro Lopo a écrit :
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Could someone clue me in as to how the src/interface.c file is
>> generated?
> AFAIK it is generated by Glade 2.x; but I'd think it's mentioned in the
> HACKING file, i
Le 07/09/2010 17:34, Nick Treleaven a écrit :
> On Sat, 04 Sep 2010 15:00:44 +0200
> Colomban Wendling wrote:
>
>> Well, beside this, I worked a while ago on a little hand-crafted Vala
>> VAPI file for Geany [1], and although it's probably buggy because not
>> well-tested, it worked. I've not tol
On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 03:15:55 +0200
Colomban Wendling wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Le 09/09/2010 03:02, Erik de Castro Lopo a écrit :
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Could someone clue me in as to how the src/interface.c file is
> > generated?
> AFAIK it is generated by Glade 2.x; but I'd think it's mentioned in
> the
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 11:02:42 +1000
Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> Could someone clue me in as to how the src/interface.c file is
> generated?
Its created by galde. Please check
http://geany.org/manual/hacking.html#glade for some info over here.
> Since its autogenerated, wouldn't it be a good id
Hi,
Le 09/09/2010 03:02, Erik de Castro Lopo a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> Could someone clue me in as to how the src/interface.c file is
> generated?
AFAIK it is generated by Glade 2.x; but I'd think it's mentioned in the
HACKING file, isn't it?
> Since its autogenerated, wouldn't it be a good idea t
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 10:59:37 +1000
Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> Frank Lanitz wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the finding. I've committed to svn, but added a
> > NULL-check just to be sure.
>
> The NULL check is un-necessary:
>
>
> http://library.gnome.org/devel/glib/unstable/glib-Memory-Allocatio
Hi all,
Could someone clue me in as to how the src/interface.c file is
generated?
Since its autogenerated, wouldn't it be a good idea to remove it
from the repo? Obviously, it should be shipped in the source code
tarball, but it is reasonable to expect that anyone working from
SVN have whatever t
Frank Lanitz wrote:
> Thanks for the finding. I've committed to svn, but added a
> NULL-check just to be sure.
The NULL check is un-necessary:
http://library.gnome.org/devel/glib/unstable/glib-Memory-Allocation.html#g-free
Erik
--
-
Hi,
On Wed, 8 Sep 2010 21:02:34 +0200
Daniel Marjamäki wrote:
> I have another fix for a memory leak. Here is the code:
>
> static void process_build_output_line(const gchar *str, gint color)
> {
> gchar *msg, *tmp;
> gchar *filename;
> gint line;
>
> msg = g_strdup(st
Hi
On Wed, 8 Sep 2010 16:14:07 +0100%
Nick Treleaven wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Aug 2010 21:59:32 +0400
> Eugene Arshinov wrote:
>
> > > > >> >> If we do want snippet keybindings perhaps it would be
> > > > >> >> better to integrate with the existing keybindings rather
> > > > >> >> than storing them
Hello!
I have another fix for a memory leak. Here is the code:
static void process_build_output_line(const gchar *str, gint color)
{
gchar *msg, *tmp;
gchar *filename;
gint line;
msg = g_strdup(str);
g_strchomp(msg);
if (! NZV(msg))
On Wed, 8 Sep 2010 15:32:17 +0100
Nick Treleaven wrote:
> Also if some lines have tab indentation and some spaces then the
> comments could be inserted at the wrong position on some lines. Not
> sure how big an issue this is.
I've just realized, for the tabs & spaces mode this would be completel
On Wed, 8 Sep 2010 17:55:36 +0300
Tambet Arak wrote:
> >> I think the idea is good, but I've just tried the patch and it doesn't
> >> work if there are empty lines in the middle of the selected block. Then
> >> the comments are all inserted at column 0.
>
> Yes, this happens because the empty li
On Sun, 29 Aug 2010 21:59:32 +0400
Eugene Arshinov wrote:
> > > >> >> If we do want snippet keybindings perhaps it would be better
> > > >> >> to integrate with the existing keybindings rather than
> > > >> >> storing them separately - then users could configure them in
> > > >> >> the normal way
Hi,
>> I think the idea is good, but I've just tried the patch and it doesn't
>> work if there are empty lines in the middle of the selected block. Then
>> the comments are all inserted at column 0.
Yes, this happens because the empty lines are not indented. In a
sense, it is the correct behavior
On Wed, 8 Sep 2010 15:32:17 +0100
Nick Treleaven wrote:
> I think the idea is good, but I've just tried the patch and it doesn't
> work if there are empty lines in the middle of the selected block. Then
> the comments are all inserted at column 0.
Forgot to mention: this is a common use case bec
Hi,
On Tue, 31 Aug 2010 17:54:45 +0300
Tambet Arak wrote:
> Any word on whether the patch will be rejected or accepted? It's
> almost two months since the last correspondence.
Sorry for the delay.
I think the idea is good, but I've just tried the patch and it doesn't
work if there are empty li
18 matches
Mail list logo
