On 03/27/11 09:11, Colomban Wendling wrote:
We need a better fix then. Maybe you can try to find out why the X
clipboard get broken on Scintilla (and fix it :D). If it get fixed, we
will probably can re-apply the patch.
When the ScintillaObject gets reparented (unrealized/re-realized), it
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 21:38:22 +1100, Lex wrote:
On 28 March 2011 17:39, Matthew Brush mbr...@codebrainz.ca wrote:
On 03/27/11 09:11, Colomban Wendling wrote:
We need a better fix then. Maybe you can try to find out why the X
clipboard get broken on Scintilla (and fix it :D). If it get fixed,
Hi,
Le 28/03/2011 05:10, Lex Trotman a écrit :
On 28 March 2011 12:35, Thomas Martitz
thomas.mart...@student.htw-berlin.de wrote:
On 27.03.2011 05:15, Lex Trotman wrote:
The question is can problems be introduced by not reparsing things, eg
if we are editing a .h file, can that affect the
Le 27/03/2011 13:23, Yura Siamashka a écrit :
On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 14:15:45 +1100
Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote:
1) geanyprj act only on document-open, document-save,
document-activate callbacks
2) geanyprj add a lot of TMWorkObject objects using
tm_workspace_add_object() to Geany
Hi,
Le 28/03/2011 22:50, Росен Стоянов a écrit :
Hey guys,
i see that there's an active development going on here with all the
patches and stuff, but i guess not everyone knows how to apply them or
is it's just me... Either way, can someone give a hint on using them? I
guess it's somewhat
On 29 March 2011 08:29, Yura Siamashka yura...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 23:00:54 +0200
Colomban Wendling lists@herbesfolles.org wrote:
Anyway here is patch that make Geany don't parse tags when user is
actively typing.
I'm not sure about this patch, because it is then
On 29 March 2011 07:37, Colomban Wendling lists@herbesfolles.org wrote:
Hi,
Le 28/03/2011 05:10, Lex Trotman a écrit :
On 28 March 2011 12:35, Thomas Martitz
thomas.mart...@student.htw-berlin.de wrote:
On 27.03.2011 05:15, Lex Trotman wrote:
The question is can problems be introduced
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 00:04, Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote:
Agreed. However the patch would *always* disable updating parent, what
we probably don't want (though, not really sure what it'd change). So I
have modified it and committed it to SVN (r5642).
Ok, oh well, as above, I'm not
