Re: [Geany-devel] geany on github; why not?

2011-09-06 Thread Jiří Techet
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 05:29, Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jiri, Great job, thanks.  Its going to take a while to inspect, but a couple of comments below (I'm only looking at the final rewrite-history version). Note I don't think we need perfection for its own sake, we need to be

Re: [Geany-devel] geany on github; why not?

2011-09-06 Thread Frank Lanitz
Am 06.09.2011 05:29, schrieb Lex Trotman: 1. Some branch names should be renamed (e.g. Geany-0_19_1) because they have the same name as tags and they are ambiguous when doing git checkout. Some naming scheme for stable branches should be invented. I notice there is some inconsistency in

Re: [Geany-devel] geany on github; why not?

2011-09-06 Thread Frank Lanitz
Am 06.09.2011 05:39, schrieb Lex Trotman: I see a gentleman called Linus is doing a test of Github for us: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/9/4/92 ;) ___ Geany-devel mailing list Geany-devel@uvena.de