Re: [Geany-devel] SF.net SVN: geany:[5909] trunk/src/utils.c

2011-09-12 Thread Lex Trotman
On 12 September 2011 18:16, Frank Lanitz fr...@frank.uvena.de wrote: Am 11.09.2011 23:53, schrieb Colomban Wendling: Le 11/09/2011 23:32, Lex Trotman a écrit : [...] What about adding chrome? Yeah, why not (though this list is a fallback one), it's very easy now :) We might then also want

Re: [Geany-devel] SF.net SVN: geany:[5909] trunk/src/utils.c

2011-09-12 Thread Thomas Martitz
Am 12.09.2011 11:09, schrieb Lex Trotman: On 12 September 2011 18:16, Frank Lanitzfr...@frank.uvena.de wrote: Am 11.09.2011 23:53, schrieb Colomban Wendling: Le 11/09/2011 23:32, Lex Trotman a écrit : [...] What about adding chrome? Yeah, why not (though this list is a fallback one), it's

Re: [Geany-devel] SF.net SVN: geany:[5909] trunk/src/utils.c

2011-09-12 Thread Lex Trotman
Otherwise the whole fallback should be removed since it is confusing and may not run the browser the user expected (depending on the order in the list).  At least when there is only the tools pref you know when its wrong, the browser won't go, with the fallback something unexpected may

Re: [Geany-devel] SF.net SVN: geany:[5909] trunk/src/utils.c

2011-09-12 Thread Frank Lanitz
Am 12.09.2011 11:16, schrieb Thomas Martitz: Am 12.09.2011 11:09, schrieb Lex Trotman: On 12 September 2011 18:16, Frank Lanitzfr...@frank.uvena.de wrote: Am 11.09.2011 23:53, schrieb Colomban Wendling: Le 11/09/2011 23:32, Lex Trotman a écrit : [...] What about adding chrome? Yeah, why

Re: [Geany-devel] SF.net SVN: geany:[5909] trunk/src/utils.c

2011-09-12 Thread Thomas Martitz
Bringing this back to geany-devel. Am 12.09.2011 11:23, schrieb Lex Trotman: Hi Thomas, [...] Yes, and calling Firefox Firefox is one of the reasons for those distros to fork debian :) Since iceweasel is a pure debian thing, it should perhaps the responsibility of the debian package

Re: [Geany-devel] SF.net SVN: geany:[5909] trunk/src/utils.c

2011-09-12 Thread Lex Trotman
[...] No, but this is not Geany's concern. Fair enough :) But if I set the preference to run firefox with an option AFAICT there is no indication that the command failed and just plain firefox ran from the list. Cheers Lex Best regards. ___

Re: [Geany-devel] SF.net SVN: geany:[5909] trunk/src/utils.c

2011-09-12 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 12/09/2011 04:49, Lex Trotman a écrit : On 12 September 2011 12:30, Matthew Brush mbr...@codebrainz.ca wrote: On 09/11/2011 02:53 PM, Colomban Wendling wrote: Le 11/09/2011 23:32, Lex Trotman a écrit : [...] What about adding chrome? And `chromium` I guess too :) Oh well better

Re: [Geany-devel] SF.net SVN: geany:[5909] trunk/src/utils.c

2011-09-12 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 12/09/2011 10:16, Frank Lanitz a écrit : Am 11.09.2011 23:53, schrieb Colomban Wendling: Le 11/09/2011 23:32, Lex Trotman a écrit : [...] What about adding chrome? Yeah, why not (though this list is a fallback one), it's very easy now :) We might then also want to add also Safari,

Re: [Geany-devel] SF.net SVN: geany:[5909] trunk/src/utils.c

2011-09-12 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 12/09/2011 11:09, Lex Trotman a écrit : On 12 September 2011 18:16, Frank Lanitz fr...@frank.uvena.de wrote: Am 11.09.2011 23:53, schrieb Colomban Wendling: Le 11/09/2011 23:32, Lex Trotman a écrit : [...] What about adding chrome? Yeah, why not (though this list is a fallback one),

Re: [Geany-devel] SF.net SVN: geany:[5909] trunk/src/utils.c

2011-09-12 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 12/09/2011 11:16, Lex Trotman a écrit : Otherwise the whole fallback should be removed since it is confusing and may not run the browser the user expected (depending on the order in the list). At least when there is only the tools pref you know when its wrong, the browser won't go, with

Re: [Geany-devel] SF.net SVN: geany:[5909] trunk/src/utils.c

2011-09-12 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 12/09/2011 15:33, Frank Lanitz a écrit : Am 12.09.2011 15:28, schrieb Colomban Wendling: Le 12/09/2011 11:16, Lex Trotman a écrit : Otherwise the whole fallback should be removed since it is confusing and may not run the browser the user expected (depending on the order in the list). At

Re: [Geany-devel] SF.net SVN: geany:[5909] trunk/src/utils.c

2011-09-12 Thread Dimitar Zhekov
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 15:27:07 +0200 Colomban Wendling lists@herbesfolles.org wrote: Actually firefox on Debian (at least mine?) runs Iceweasel, so it's not a concern from our POV. debian$ cat /usr/bin/firefox #!/bin/sh FIREFOX=$(which $0) [ -x $FIREFOX.real ] exec $FIREFOX.real $@ exec

[Geany-devel] GeanyPy Keybindings Again

2011-09-12 Thread Matthew Brush
Hi, I started working on keybindings again for GeanyPy and I was hoping to get a little advice from the experts. I've hacked together some code that allows the single GeanyPy plugin to create new GeanyPlugin structs so that it can add multiple keygroups for the single plugin. This actually

Re: [Geany-devel] GeanyPy Keybindings Again

2011-09-12 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 12/09/2011 22:16, Matthew Brush a écrit : Hi, Hey, I started working on keybindings again for GeanyPy and I was hoping to get a little advice from the experts. Experts? OK, I don't feel concerned :D I've hacked together some code that allows the single GeanyPy plugin to create new

Re: [Geany-devel] GeanyPy Keybindings Again

2011-09-12 Thread Lex Trotman
Hi Matthew, On 13 September 2011 06:16, Matthew Brush mbr...@codebrainz.ca wrote: Hi, I started working on keybindings again for GeanyPy and I was hoping to get a little advice from the experts. Can't provide any of that, but can heckle from the cheap seats :) I've hacked together some

Re: [Geany-devel] GeanyPy Keybindings Again

2011-09-12 Thread Matthew Brush
On 09/12/2011 04:37 PM, Lex Trotman wrote: Hi Matthew, On 13 September 2011 06:16, Matthew Brushmbr...@codebrainz.ca wrote: Hi, I started working on keybindings again for GeanyPy and I was hoping to get a little advice from the experts. Can't provide any of that, but can heckle from the

Re: [Geany-devel] GeanyPy Keybindings Again

2011-09-12 Thread Lex Trotman
[...] Of course it needs more thought and lots more work, but I guess I will have to settle for something like this until we get motivated to mess with the plugin code in Geany. At least it's not nearly as hacky as my previous ideas :) Yeah, looks like a viable interim workaround. Cheers