On 2 October 2011 13:43, wrote:
> Hello,
> I just wanted everyone to know that I've updated the 'Version control
> options' section of the wiki
> (https://wiki.geany.org/version_control_options). I realize there are no
> negative bullet-points for anything yet, but I wanted to get the good
Hello,
I just wanted everyone to know that I've updated the 'Version control
options' section of the wiki (https://wiki.geany.org/version_control_options).
I realize there are no negative bullet-points for anything yet, but I wanted to
get the good stuff in there first. Looking forward t
2011/10/1 Enrico Tröger :
> On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 01:21:59 -0700, Matthew wrote:
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>Is there some specific distro or platform that sets the oldest GTK+
>>version Geany needs to support? I had a conversation with Enrico on
>>IRC some time back and he explained that Geany supports older GTK+
On 11-10-01 07:11 AM, Colomban Wendling wrote:
Le 30/09/2011 03:08, Matthew Brush a écrit :
On 09/29/2011 02:59 PM, Colomban Wendling wrote:
Finally, if you choose "something else", you could perhaps elaborate by
responding to this mail :)
2.10 (ie. 0.21 * 10) - because it matches closer to
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 03:07, Lex Trotman wrote:
> On 30 September 2011 06:52, Jiří Techet wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 10:03, Thomas Martitz
>> wrote:
>>> Am 29.09.2011 09:57, schrieb Jacques du Rand:
BottomLIne:
Almost like a MRU(Most Recently Use) Cache for the Open Docum
>>2.1(0) is already used by some users that don't remember where the dot
Haha !
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Colomban Wendling
wrote:
> Le 30/09/2011 03:08, Matthew Brush a écrit :
>> On 09/29/2011 02:59 PM, Colomban Wendling wrote:
>>
>>> Finally, if you choose "something else", you could per
Le 30/09/2011 03:08, Matthew Brush a écrit :
> On 09/29/2011 02:59 PM, Colomban Wendling wrote:
>
>> Finally, if you choose "something else", you could perhaps elaborate by
>> responding to this mail :)
>>
>
> 2.10 (ie. 0.21 * 10) - because it matches closer to the GTK+ and
> Scintilla versions.
Well well, we've got quite some votes, thanks guys!
However, we can't say there is a clear winner: 0.21 and 1.0 got the same
vote count [1], but 0.21 got one more "unique" vote [2].
Le 30/09/2011 23:48, Jiří Techet a écrit :
> [...]
>
> If it's too late to bump the version number for the upcomin
Le 01/10/2011 12:10, Enrico Tröger a écrit :
> On Sat, 1 Oct 2011 10:14:43 +1000, Lex wrote:
>
>>> [..thinking about finally announcing the wiki...]
>>>
>>> If nobody else has any blockers in mind, we could finally announce it
>>> to get more people look, use and extend it :).
>>>
>>> The only que
On 11-10-01 03:05 AM, Enrico Tröger wrote:
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 01:21:59 -0700, Matthew wrote:
So I was just curious *specifically* what distro(s) and version(s)
sets the oldest version of GTK+ that Geany should support?
I don't know anything as specific as you probably want to hear, sadly.
I
On Sat, 1 Oct 2011 10:14:43 +1000, Lex wrote:
>> [..thinking about finally announcing the wiki...]
>>
>> If nobody else has any blockers in mind, we could finally announce it
>> to get more people look, use and extend it :).
>>
>> The only question is whether it is better to announce it before or
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 01:21:59 -0700, Matthew wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Is there some specific distro or platform that sets the oldest GTK+
>version Geany needs to support? I had a conversation with Enrico on
>IRC some time back and he explained that Geany supports older GTK+
>versions so that "enterprise" a
12 matches
Mail list logo
