On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 10:20:23 +1100
Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
Although in my, probably poorly informed, opinion, gproject seems
to encompass most of geanyprj
Not completely. The main difference is that gproject is an extension
of Geany's projects. As such, displays just
On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 22:41:07 -0700
Matthew Brush mbr...@codebrainz.ca wrote:
Anyway, just a thought to make things more consistent and less
redundant. It seems like while converting and moving to Git would be
an ideal time to do this. Feel free to +1, -1, comment or ignore.
I don't have
On Sun, 30 Oct 2011 16:01:22 +0100
Dominic Hopf dma...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am Freitag, den 28.10.2011, 16:46 -0700 schrieb Matthew Brush:
1)
There are guys out there who write C code and may use debugging
plugins from within Geany. There are at least two alternative
plugins
On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 20:15:25 -0500
Josh joshua...@comcast.net wrote:
Last time Matt noted I should've provided code to go with the
'fork me on github' banners. So the following will get a 'fork me'
banner on geany.org (if that's desired; also, this scrolls w/the
page):
IMHO we can put a
On Sat, 29 Oct 2011 14:38:11 +1100
Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote:
update checker - webkitdev
I've updated the RADME for this, but the only dependency should
be libsoup. Not sure where webkit is coming from.
Cheers,
Frank
--
http://frank.uvena.de/en/
pgph1BbduPJ57.pgp
Description:
On 31 October 2011 21:30, Frank Lanitz fr...@frank.uvena.de wrote:
On Sat, 29 Oct 2011 14:38:11 +1100
Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote:
update checker - webkitdev
I've updated the RADME for this, but the only dependency should
be libsoup. Not sure where webkit is coming from.
Hi Frank,
On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 21:37:30 +1100
Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote:
On 31 October 2011 21:30, Frank Lanitz fr...@frank.uvena.de wrote:
On Sat, 29 Oct 2011 14:38:11 +1100
Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote:
update checker - webkitdev
I've updated the RADME for this, but the only
On Sun, 23 Oct 2011 02:08:54 -0700
Matthew Brush mbr...@codebrainz.ca wrote:
Hi All,
Just wanted to throw out the idea of a hackfest for Geany and/or
Geany Plugins. Obviously only a handful of us can get together in
meat space but between IRC, IM, the ML, and now GitHub, I think we
can
On 25/10/2011 00:33, Lex Trotman wrote:
[...]
If we go back to individual commit mails with diffs, is there anyway to
limit how many individual messages get sent out at once and how many lines
can be in a diff? Ex. if we merge the gtkbuilder branch at some point, is
there anyway to prevent
Le 31/10/2011 08:37, Frank Lanitz a écrit :
On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 10:20:23 +1100
Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
Although in my, probably poorly informed, opinion, gproject seems
to encompass most of geanyprj
Not completely. The main difference is that gproject is an extension
of
On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 13:47:44 +0100
Colomban Wendling lists@herbesfolles.org wrote:
Le 31/10/2011 08:37, Frank Lanitz a écrit :
On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 10:20:23 +1100
Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
Although in my, probably poorly informed, opinion, gproject seems
to
On 10/31/11 4:47 PM, Colomban Wendling wrote:
Le 31/10/2011 08:37, Frank Lanitz a écrit :
On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 10:20:23 +1100
Lex Trotmanele...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
Although in my, probably poorly informed, opinion, gproject seems
to encompass most of geanyprj
Not completely. The main
On 11-10-31 05:00 AM, Nick Treleaven wrote:
On 25/10/2011 00:33, Lex Trotman wrote:
[...]
If we go back to individual commit mails with diffs, is there anyway to
limit how many individual messages get sent out at once and how many
lines
can be in a diff? Ex. if we merge the gtkbuilder branch
On 10/31/2011 06:45 AM, Frank Lanitz wrote:
On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 06:29:36 -0700
Matthew Brushmbr...@codebrainz.ca wrote:
On 11-10-31 05:00 AM, Nick Treleaven wrote:
On 25/10/2011 00:33, Lex Trotman wrote:
[...]
If we go back to individual commit mails with diffs, is there
anyway to limit
On 31/10/2011 13:57, Matthew Brush wrote:
I'm not sure we would see a flood on a merge, probably only one
commit saying 'merged gtkbuilder branch'? The gtkbuilder commits
should appear as they are committed, not on merge.
I think when you merge it makes all the commits onto the branch that
On 31/10/2011 15:07, Nick Treleaven wrote:
On 31/10/2011 13:57, Matthew Brush wrote:
I'm not sure we would see a flood on a merge, probably only one
commit saying 'merged gtkbuilder branch'? The gtkbuilder commits
should appear as they are committed, not on merge.
I think when you merge it
On 19/10/2011 08:47, Matthew Brush wrote:
On 11-10-17 05:22 AM, Nick Treleaven wrote:
Hi Matthew,
I'm a bit concerned about the changed ui_lookup_widget (and hookup)
functions - these are in the plugin API and can be used independently
from Glade. (plugin) API function behaviour should not
On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 16:44:52 +
Nick Treleaven nick.trelea...@btinternet.com wrote:
On 31/10/2011 15:07, Nick Treleaven wrote:
On 31/10/2011 13:57, Matthew Brush wrote:
I'm not sure we would see a flood on a merge, probably only one
commit saying 'merged gtkbuilder branch'? The
Am Montag, den 31.10.2011, 12:09 +0100 schrieb Frank Lanitz:
Hi all,
Due a little issue with source tarball of 0.21-release of Geany-Plugins
0.21.1 has been released which fixes an issue of non working waf-build
system from inside the source tarball.
This implies that distro packages
On 1 November 2011 00:03, Jiří Techet tec...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 00:20, Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
Although in my, probably poorly informed, opinion, gproject seems to
encompass most of geanyprj
Not completely. The main difference is that gproject is an
On 10/31/2011 09:44 AM, Nick Treleaven wrote:
On 31/10/2011 15:07, Nick Treleaven wrote:
On 31/10/2011 13:57, Matthew Brush wrote:
I'm not sure we would see a flood on a merge, probably only one
commit saying 'merged gtkbuilder branch'? The gtkbuilder commits
should appear as they are
Hi All,
One area of Geany has been annoying me for some time.
At the moment project settings mix session related settings and truely
project settings. The session settings are really user specific
whilst the project settings are project related. This means that if
the project file is in VCS it
On 11-10-31 04:50 PM, Lex Trotman wrote:
Hi All,
One area of Geany has been annoying me for some time.
At the moment project settings mix session related settings and truely
project settings. The session settings are really user specific
whilst the project settings are project related. This
On 1 November 2011 11:49, Matthew Brush mbr...@codebrainz.ca wrote:
On 11-10-31 04:50 PM, Lex Trotman wrote:
Hi All,
One area of Geany has been annoying me for some time.
At the moment project settings mix session related settings and truely
project settings. The session settings are
24 matches
Mail list logo
