On 11/02/2011 08:17 AM, Jiří Techet wrote:
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 15:43, Matthew Brush wrote:
On 11-11-01 06:11 AM, Jiří Techet wrote:
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 23:25, Matthew Brushwrote:
On 11-10-30 03:03 PM, Frank Lanitz wrote:
On Sun, 30 Oct 2011 02:15:33 -0700
Matthew Brush wro
Hi Jiri,
Your sm-branch repository referenced here
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.editors.geany.devel/5576/match=sm+branch
does not seem to contain any sm code?
Cheers
Lex
___
Geany-devel mailing list
Geany-devel@uvena.de
https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/
Hi Nick,
Good idea, I have one question below.
[...]
> It's possible plugins may need updating, but after a quick grep it seems
> perhaps only the core Save Actions plugin. For auto-saving it may want to
> ignore documents without an absolute path to avoid showing the Save As
> dialog. I'll make
[...]
> What do you mean by broken ? I must admit that I don't look closely at it as
> far as it works as expected :)
Unfortunately compiled against Geany Git it crashes creating a new
project. I don't have time (or interest I admit) to find out why, but
it may need some maintenance.
Cheers
Lex
[...]
>> Everything else is shared via VCS, so its annoying that one thing isn't.
>
> As I said, you can already share settings, you just can't easily synchronize
> them *if* they change.
>
>> Whats the problem with doing it?
>
> It adds code complexity, plus backwards compatibility would make the
Hi folks,
Again about two month passed by and a new issue of the newsletter is
right on the way to get reach finish line. I'm targeting upcoming
weekend or early next week for release.
Well, if you like to add something, a couple of days are still left to
send us your content for the newsletter.
Am 02.11.2011 15:36, schrieb Nick Treleaven:
I could bring up the Eclipse argument to say that worse is better. The
more use cases Geany caters to, the more Eclipse-like it will be.
I don't think we're any way near that. I also don't think we should stop
improving (and making it possible to
Le 02/11/2011 18:18, Enrico Tröger a écrit :
> On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 15:29:08 -0700, Matthew wrote:
>
>> On 10/31/2011 09:44 AM, Nick Treleaven wrote:
>>> On 31/10/2011 15:07, Nick Treleaven wrote:
On 31/10/2011 13:57, Matthew Brush wrote:
I'm not sure we would see a flood on a merge,
On Wed, 2 Nov 2011 09:39:48 +1100
Lex Trotman wrote:
> On 2 November 2011 05:19, Dimitar Zhekov wrote:
> > On Tue, 1 Nov 2011 12:21:25 +1100
> > Lex Trotman wrote:
> >
> > At which point will you delete the unneeded session files?..
>
> When they fall off the recent projects list.
For a small
On Sun, 30 Oct 2011 15:25:10 -0700, Matthew wrote:
>On 11-10-30 03:03 PM, Frank Lanitz wrote:
>> On Sun, 30 Oct 2011 02:15:33 -0700
>> Matthew Brush wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I haven't heard too much about the Git conversion of Geany Plugins,
>>> but I wanted to offer a suggestion that might impr
On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 15:29:08 -0700, Matthew wrote:
>On 10/31/2011 09:44 AM, Nick Treleaven wrote:
>> On 31/10/2011 15:07, Nick Treleaven wrote:
>>> On 31/10/2011 13:57, Matthew Brush wrote:
>>> I'm not sure we would see a flood on a merge, probably only one
>>> commit saying 'merged gtkbui
> It would be interesting to know which features you enjoy most. Perhaps
> gproject already offers them or can be extended.
1) Multi projects opened in a single instance of Geany
2) Setting up a new project is more straightforward :
- Download a tarball -> open a file on the root -> click menu
Ok, I gave Gproject a try :
> Since 'Symbol list update frequency' (aka real time symbol parsing)
> got in, GeanyPRJ lags every miliseconds. Geany stops taking
> input every cycle until the cycle is done.
I haven't noticed that
> Secondly: saving a file
> takes 1-2 seconds.
Ok, but closing Ge
On 02/11/2011 15:44, Nick Treleaven wrote:
Remembering to show the Save As dialog in all code for the same reason
was not reliable enough. That code can now be removed, but won't cause
users any problems if left.
BTW the only plugin that seems to use dialogs_show_save_as() is
geanysendmail - I
Hi all,
I've just made a commit which changes plugin API behaviour, which I
think is necessary. Please see the full log message below for justification.
It's possible plugins may need updating, but after a quick grep it seems
perhaps only the core Save Actions plugin. For auto-saving it may wa
Am 02.11.2011 15:27, schrieb Johann SAUNIER:
I couldn't live without it either at work or at home.
It would be interesting to know which features you enjoy most. Perhaps
gproject already offers them or can be extended.
Best regards.
___
Geany-deve
Am 30.10.2011 22:48, schrieb Jiří Techet:
> Hi,
>
> I've created a repository for testing geany-plugins conversion from
> svn to git here:
>
> https://github.com/techee/geany-plugins
>
> After consultation with Frank, it converts only the combined
> geany-plugins repository, not the individual p
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 15:43, Matthew Brush wrote:
> On 11-11-01 06:11 AM, Jiří Techet wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 23:25, Matthew Brush wrote:
>>>
>>> On 11-10-30 03:03 PM, Frank Lanitz wrote:
On Sun, 30 Oct 2011 02:15:33 -0700
Matthew Brush wrote:
> Hi,
>
On 02/11/2011 12:10, Lex Trotman wrote:
[...]
Yes, I just question whether it's worth supporting that.
Well, it comes down to how groups and individuals work, you may not
want to share projects settings, but I am part of groups who do.
Everything else is shared via VCS, so its annoying that o
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 15:27, Johann SAUNIER wrote:
>> >> Unfortunately I have to admit that GeanyPRJ is indeed quite broken and
>> >> lags the whole interface when enabled on a recent build of Geany.
>> >>
>>
>
> What do you mean by broken ? I must admit that I don't look closely at it as
> far a
Please don't kill geanyprj : It's a killer plugin !!!
I've been using it for three years now and tweaked it to my needs (but
still haven't found the time to make it clean and push it to the
maintainer).
I couldn't live without it either at work or at home.
2011/11/1 Harold Aling
> On T
Am 02.11.2011 13:10, schrieb Lex Trotman:
Well, it comes down to how groups and individuals work, you may not
want to share projects settings, but I am part of groups who do.
Everything else is shared via VCS, so its annoying that one thing isn't.
Whats the problem with doing it?
Even if it
[...]
> Yes, I just question whether it's worth supporting that.
Well, it comes down to how groups and individuals work, you may not
want to share projects settings, but I am part of groups who do.
Everything else is shared via VCS, so its annoying that one thing isn't.
Whats the problem with do
On 01/11/2011 22:24, Lex Trotman wrote:
On 2 November 2011 00:09, Nick Treleaven wrote:
On 31/10/2011 23:50, Lex Trotman wrote:
IIUC the functionality would be the same but with different storage?
If so I'm not sure this would be worthwhile complexity. A starting project
file could be hand
Am 01.11.2011 23:39, schrieb Lex Trotman:
The point is to get the session file out of the project tree, so no
this defeats the purpose.
The point was to get the file list (i.e. what would be in that session
file) out of VCS while keeping the project settings in.
This works with separate fi
25 matches
Mail list logo
