Re: [Geany-devel] Geany-Plugins: MAINTAINERS file

2012-01-07 Thread Frank Lanitz
On Fri, 6 Jan 2012 23:42:39 +0100
Frank Lanitz fr...@frank.uvena.de wrote:

  * What's the exact difference between Supported and Maintained?  The
  only difference I see is that supported has the word paid in the
  description, but I doubt that most of us get paid for this in
  particular, and I also doubt it changes anything on how good is the
  support (hobby vs. job).
 
 My fault. I wanted to change this but missed it. I wanted to
 s/supported/paid for ... (Even I don't know anybody at the moment who
 is getting paid with Geany stuff ;) )

I suggest to use paid instead of supported and change current usage of
supported to maintained. 

Cheers, 
Frank 
-- 
http://frank.uvena.de/en/


pgpYT2is6fZNZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Geany-devel mailing list
Geany-devel@uvena.de
https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel


Re: [Geany-devel] Geany-Plugins: MAINTAINERS file

2012-01-07 Thread Colomban Wendling

Le 07/01/2012 16:00, Frank Lanitz a écrit :

On Fri, 6 Jan 2012 23:42:39 +0100
Frank Lanitzfr...@frank.uvena.de  wrote:


* What's the exact difference between Supported and Maintained?  The
only difference I see is that supported has the word paid in the
description, but I doubt that most of us get paid for this in
particular, and I also doubt it changes anything on how good is the
support (hobby vs. job).


My fault. I wanted to change this but missed it. I wanted to
s/supported/paid for ... (Even I don't know anybody at the moment who
is getting paid with Geany stuff ;) )


I suggest to use paid instead of supported and change current usage of
supported to maintained.


I'm still not sure what that fact someone is paid or not changes, but 
otherwise it looks fine and clearer to me.


Cheers,
Colomban
___
Geany-devel mailing list
Geany-devel@uvena.de
https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel


Re: [Geany-devel] Maintainerrequest: Geany-Mini-Script

2012-01-07 Thread Eugene Arshinov
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 00:03:30 +0400
Eugene Arshinov earshi...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 22:41:06 +0100
 Frank Lanitz fr...@frank.uvena.de wrote:
 
  Am 08.10.2011 21:50, schrieb Eugene Arshinov:
Unfortunately I didn't heard back of developer of
geany-mini-script-plugin so today I like to ask you whether
somebody likes to take over maintenance for geany-mini-script
plugin inside geany-plugins-svn. It's untouched since maybe
2009 and to be honest I have no idea, what's the current
status. Also I'm not 100% whether its still a useful plugin or
maybe some other plugin is taking over the task in a better
way. Personally I remember it as a possible useful plugin but
don't have the resources to look after and used it 1 year
for the last time. If nobody is feeling responsible I suggest,
similar to previous plugins, we remove it from official
repository. 
  
   In case someone wants to try the plugin, here is a patch to make
   it compile.
  
  Did anyone try it? Does anyone likes to take it over and maybe
  integrate it into geany-plugins?
  
 
 If no one wants, I could take a minimal care of this plugin.  Though,
 I can't promise I'll have time for it when it's needed.  I still have
 SM-branch related stuff which I can't do for weeks...
 

Hi Frank.

I wonder what's the state of the geany-mini-scripts plugin now?  It
seems that only SVN's /geany-plugins/geany-plugins/ part was converted
to Git, and AFAIR geany-mini-script was living next to geany-plugins
(at /geany-plugins/geany-mini-script/) and wasn't converted.

I can use the copy from my local geany-plugins Git repository (bound to
the old SVN repository) and push it somewhere on Github.  Then perhaps
I can integrate the plugin into geany-plugins, push the result to a
fork of geany-plugins and send a pull request.  Is it the way to go?

--
Best regards,
Eugene.
___
Geany-devel mailing list
Geany-devel@uvena.de
https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel


Re: [Geany-devel] Geany-Plugins: MAINTAINERS file

2012-01-07 Thread Eugene Arshinov
On Fri, 06 Jan 2012 10:29:30 +0100
Frank Lanitz fr...@frank.uvena.de wrote:

 Hi folks,
 
 We have just added a MAINTAINERS into git to add a single point to
 find who is responsible for a plugin. Please be so kind and sending in
 patches or updating the file on your own for your plugins to show who
 is maintaining etc. File contains a little header with very brief
 instructions to do so.

Hi.

Here's xmlsnippets' maintainer info (e.g., mine)

--
Best regards,
Eugene.diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index f5f0d26..684dd74 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ W: http://plugins.geany.org/webhelper.html
 S: Supported
 
 xmlsnippets
-P:
-M:
-W:
-S:
+P: Eugene Arshinov earshi...@gmail.com
+M: Eugene Arshinov earshi...@gmail.com
+W: http://plugins.geany.org/xmlsnippets.html
+S: Maintained
___
Geany-devel mailing list
Geany-devel@uvena.de
https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel


Re: [Geany-devel] Geany-Plugins: MAINTAINERS file

2012-01-07 Thread Thomas Martitz

Am 07.01.2012 17:34, schrieb Eugene Arshinov:

Hi.

Here's xmlsnippets' maintainer info (e.g., mine)



I suggest you to use git format-patch, as to preserve author and commit 
message information. Probably not a big deal for this one though.


Best regards.

___
Geany-devel mailing list
Geany-devel@uvena.de
https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel