Re: [Geany-devel] How about calling the next release 1.0?

2011-10-01 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 30/09/2011 03:08, Matthew Brush a écrit : > On 09/29/2011 02:59 PM, Colomban Wendling wrote: > >> Finally, if you choose "something else", you could perhaps elaborate by >> responding to this mail :) >> > > 2.10 (ie. 0.21 * 10) - because it matches clo

Re: [Geany-devel] How about calling the next release 1.0?

2011-10-01 Thread Colomban Wendling
Well well, we've got quite some votes, thanks guys! However, we can't say there is a clear winner: 0.21 and 1.0 got the same vote count [1], but 0.21 got one more "unique" vote [2]. Le 30/09/2011 23:48, Jiří Techet a écrit : > [...] > > If it's too late to bump the version number for the upcomin

Re: [Geany-devel] Announcements

2011-10-01 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 01/10/2011 12:10, Enrico Tröger a écrit : > On Sat, 1 Oct 2011 10:14:43 +1000, Lex wrote: > >>> [..thinking about finally announcing the wiki...] >>> >>> If nobody else has any blockers in mind, we could finally announce it >>> to get more people look, use and extend it :). >>> >>> The only que

Re: [Geany-devel] How about calling the next release 1.0?

2011-09-29 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 20/09/2011 12:07, Jiří Techet a écrit : > Hi, Hey, > just one very quick and possibly stupid idea. How about getting rid of > the 0 version prefix and calling the next release 1.0? This would be > just numbering change, not some milestone based on features that have > to be implemented (simila

Re: [Geany-devel] How about calling the next release 1.0?

2011-09-29 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 22/09/2011 23:00, Enrico Tröger a écrit : > On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 15:28:21 +0200, Colomban wrote: > >> Le 20/09/2011 23:26, Enrico Tröger a écrit : >>> On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 16:10:34 +0300, Yura wrote: >>> Hi But why only 1.0? GNOME 3.* KDE 4.* Scite 2.*

Re: [Geany-devel] Bug on utils_string_replace()?

2011-09-28 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 28/09/2011 19:36, Frank Lanitz a écrit : > On Sun, 25 Sep 2011 20:11:06 +0200 > [...] > > Just want to bring it up again. Release is near so at least we should > add a comment to api documentation about this. Right. Fixed now in r5965, thanks. If we want to deprecate the use of NULL here, I

Re: [Geany-devel] editing big files can be too slow with tag reparsing

2011-09-26 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 27/09/2011 02:03, Lex Trotman a écrit : > Hey Colomban, > > [...] >> 0001-Per-document-real-time-symbols-setting.patch: >> Adds a per-document setting for real-time updates and a menu item in the >> Document menu. There is still a FIXME in it, feel free to give ideas :) >> > > This looks like

Re: [Geany-devel] editing big files can be too slow with tag reparsing - HTML

2011-09-26 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 27/09/2011 01:44, Lex Trotman a écrit : > [...] > >> Pentium 4, 1.9 GHz, 512 MB ram. >> > > I'm no windows expert, but isn't 512mb considered kinda marginal, 1gb > better. Whats your general windows performance like? I doubt that, even on Windows, it would so drastically reduce the performan

Re: [Geany-devel] editing big files can be too slow with tag reparsing - HTML

2011-09-26 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 26/09/2011 13:48, Nick Treleaven a écrit : > On 24/09/2011 11:59, Colomban Wendling wrote: >> Le 22/09/2011 18:30, Nick Treleaven a écrit : >>> Hi, >>> Whilst opening doc/geany.html I found it takes>5s on my machine to >>> load. It's a big docume

Re: [Geany-devel] editing big files can be too slow with tag reparsing

2011-09-26 Thread Colomban Wendling
e, like if regexes was eeaalyyy slow on Windows (or everywhere?) >From c080dec21d2bf18a525064922c9c88aeece9e1a9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Colomban Wendling Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 23:25:11 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Per-document real-time symbols

Re: [Geany-devel] editing big files can be too slow with tag reparsing

2011-09-26 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 24/09/2011 12:39, Lex Trotman a écrit : > On 24 September 2011 20:33, Colomban Wendling > wrote: >> Le 23/09/2011 03:09, Lex Trotman a écrit : >>> On 23 September 2011 10:34, Matthew Brush wrote: >>>> On 09/22/2011 09:30 AM, Nick Treleaven wrote: >>

Re: [Geany-devel] Bug on utils_string_replace()?

2011-09-25 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 25/09/2011 20:01, Colomban Wendling a écrit : > Le 25/09/2011 19:36, Thomas Martitz a écrit : >> Am 25.09.2011 19:20, schrieb Frank Lanitz: >>> Hi folks, >>> >>> I found a possible issue with changes done on utils_string_replace-* >>> functions i&#x

Re: [Geany-devel] GeanySendMail: Adding a workaround for a weird issue in connection with utils_string_replace_all(). (was SF.net SVN: geany-plugins:[2214] trunk/geany-plugins/geanysendmail)

2011-09-25 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 25/09/2011 18:59, fr...@users.sourceforge.net a écrit : > Revision: 2214 > > http://geany-plugins.svn.sourceforge.net/geany-plugins/?rev=2214&view=rev > Author: frlan > Date: 2011-09-25 16:59:59 + (Sun, 25 Sep 2011) > Log Message: > --- > GeanySendMail: Adding a work

Re: [Geany-devel] Bug on utils_string_replace()?

2011-09-25 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 25/09/2011 19:36, Thomas Martitz a écrit : > Am 25.09.2011 19:20, schrieb Frank Lanitz: >> Hi folks, >> >> I found a possible issue with changes done on utils_string_replace-* >> functions i've added a workaround to geanysendmail with svn r2214. >> >> I was digging a bit and I guess I found the

Re: [Geany-devel] Updating images in the documentation

2011-09-25 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 25/09/2011 17:05, Enrico Tröger a écrit : > Hey guys, > > for the upcoming release we should update the images in the > documentation, in particular those for the preferences dialog. > > I remember the discussions in the past about the GTK theme+engine used > for the images. For some reason, n

Re: [Geany-devel] editing big files can be too slow with tag reparsing

2011-09-24 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 22/09/2011 18:30, Nick Treleaven a écrit : > Hi, > Whilst opening doc/geany.html I found it takes >5s on my machine to > load. It's a big document though, still perhaps the HTML tag parser > performance could be improved. I think 5s is weird in the first place. I know geany.html is 6.5k-lines

Re: [Geany-devel] editing big files can be too slow with tag reparsing

2011-09-24 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 23/09/2011 19:48, Thomas Martitz a écrit : > Am 22.09.2011 18:30, schrieb Nick Treleaven: >> Hi, >> Whilst opening doc/geany.html I found it takes >5s on my machine to >> load. It's a big document though, still perhaps the HTML tag parser >> performance could be improved. >> >> But now we have t

Re: [Geany-devel] editing big files can be too slow with tag reparsing

2011-09-24 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 23/09/2011 03:09, Lex Trotman a écrit : > On 23 September 2011 10:34, Matthew Brush wrote: >> On 09/22/2011 09:30 AM, Nick Treleaven wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> Whilst opening doc/geany.html I found it takes >5s on my machine to >>> load. It's a big document though, still perhaps the HTML tag parser

Re: [Geany-devel] How about calling the next release 1.0?

2011-09-22 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 20/09/2011 23:26, Enrico Tröger a écrit : > On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 16:10:34 +0300, Yura wrote: > >> Hi >> >> But why only 1.0? >> >> GNOME 3.* >> KDE 4.* >> Scite 2.* >> >> What about Geany 3000? Or some kind of other stupid release name like >> ''busel', 'verabei', 'krumkach' ... > > Heh, I like

Re: [Geany-devel] ChangeLog for Geany: is that useful, for who and how? (was Re: Geany-Plugins: Please check for ChangeLog-entries on commit)

2011-09-19 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 20/09/2011 00:18, Lex Trotman a écrit : > [...] >>> Oh no, I planned to start (again [1]) a discussion about *removing* >>> ChangeLog committing :D (OK, I though about Geany itself, not GP) >>> >>> I'll start it right now then, if you don't mind. >> >> I'm open to start a discussion about Chang

Re: [Geany-devel] ChangeLog for Geany: is that useful, for who and how? (was Re: Geany-Plugins: Please check for ChangeLog-entries on commit)

2011-09-19 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 19/09/2011 17:55, Frank Lanitz a écrit : > Hi, > > On Mon, 19 Sep 2011 17:45:04 +0200 > Colomban Wendling wrote: > >> Le 19/09/2011 08:15, Frank Lanitz a écrit : >>> Hi folks, >>> >>> Another episode from topic improving plugins by Frank ;) &

[Geany-devel] ChangeLog for Geany: is that useful, for who and how? (was Re: Geany-Plugins: Please check for ChangeLog-entries on commit)

2011-09-19 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 19/09/2011 08:15, Frank Lanitz a écrit : > Hi folks, > > Another episode from topic improving plugins by Frank ;) > > In last time I saw a lot of changes going in into plugins without > having a ChageLog entry set. > > Its not always useful in every case but its a nice thing for users of > trunk

Re: [Geany-devel] GeanyPy in next plugin release

2011-09-19 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 18/09/2011 04:55, Matthew Brush a écrit : > Hi, Hey, > Does anyone have any opinions about me putting GeanyPy into > geany-plugins SVN and trying to get it included in the next plugins > release? It depends on whether GeanPy can be/is considered stable or not. If it is, I see no reason why i

[Geany-devel] A few JavaScript tag parser fixes from exuberant ctags?

2011-09-17 Thread Colomban Wendling
te >From f8a22cd0c04cdffc4dae1352db79e859537c23c5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Colomban Wendling Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2011 19:37:53 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Import exuberant ctags' JavaScript parser fixes This imports revs from 664 to 763 (actually only 664, 665, 666 and 763 touches jscript.c

Re: [Geany-devel] various prefs warning - changing 'various'

2011-09-16 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 17/09/2011 02:55, Matthew Brush a écrit : > On 09/16/2011 08:03 AM, Colomban Wendling wrote: >> Le 16/09/2011 16:40, Matthew Brush a écrit : > >>> >>> Right, so if someone takes 5 minutes to rename Various to >>> today then it will save it from having t

Re: [Geany-devel] various prefs warning - changing 'various'

2011-09-16 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 16/09/2011 16:40, Matthew Brush a écrit : > On 09/16/2011 07:23 AM, Lex Trotman wrote: >> [...] >>> I would've thought it'd be easy to change the two user-facing labels, >>> like 5 >>> minutes easy. Seems to me now would be the ideal time to change >>> those two >>> labels. Or, is it possible

Re: [Geany-devel] SF.net SVN: geany:[5909] trunk/src/utils.c

2011-09-16 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 15/09/2011 04:14, Lex Trotman a écrit : > Hi Colomban, > > [...] >> >> Committed with a slightly updated label, but feel free to still comment >> on it. > > Very minor suggestion, I'd say "...or enter another one" instead of > select. Select implies select from a list. Right, fixed. Tanks :)

Re: [Geany-devel] SF.net SVN: geany:[5917] trunk/NEWS

2011-09-15 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 15/09/2011 10:21, Enrico Tröger a écrit : > On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 02:16:11 +0200, Colomban wrote: > >> Le 15/09/2011 02:13, Lex Trotman a écrit : >>> On 15 September 2011 09:59, Matthew Brush >>> wrote: On 09/14/2011 07:38 AM, nt...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: > > --- >

Re: [Geany-devel] various prefs warning

2011-09-15 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 15/09/2011 16:48, Nick Treleaven a écrit : > --- On Wed, 14/9/11, Colomban Wendling wrote: > [...] > >>> The dangerous settings are gio_unsafe_save_backup, >>> use_gio_unsafe_file_saving and use_safe_file_saving, >> and IMHO their >>> names are quite

Re: [Geany-devel] Various pref changes not ignored on dialog cancel

2011-09-15 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 15/09/2011 19:59, Dimitar Zhekov a écrit : > On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 17:45:25 +0100 (BST) > Nick Treleaven wrote: > >> I've found a bug when changing a various pref setting in the prefs >> dialog, then cancelling the dialog without applying the changes. >> Next time the dialog is shown the edited

Re: [Geany-devel] SF.net SVN: geany:[5909] trunk/src/utils.c

2011-09-14 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 12/09/2011 16:21, Colomban Wendling a écrit : > Le 12/09/2011 15:33, Frank Lanitz a écrit : >> Am 12.09.2011 15:28, schrieb Colomban Wendling: >>> Le 12/09/2011 11:16, Lex Trotman a écrit : >>>>> Otherwise the whole fallback should be removed since it is co

Re: [Geany-devel] SF.net SVN: geany:[5917] trunk/NEWS

2011-09-14 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 15/09/2011 02:13, Lex Trotman a écrit : > On 15 September 2011 09:59, Matthew Brush wrote: >> On 09/14/2011 07:38 AM, nt...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: >>> >>> --- >>> Add ntrel's changes for 0.21. >>> >> [...] >>> >>> + >>> +Editor >>> +* Update Scintilla to version 2.22. >> >

Re: [Geany-devel] various prefs warning

2011-09-14 Thread Colomban Wendling
Hi, Le 14/09/2011 20:04, Dimitar Zhekov a écrit : > On Wed, 14 Sep 2011 17:47:41 +0100 (BST) > Nick Treleaven wrote: > >> I think there should be a clear warning about changing the new >> various prefs - e.g. a user might enable use_safe_file_saving and >> then run into problems. > > What are t

Re: [Geany-devel] GeanyPy Keybindings Again

2011-09-12 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 12/09/2011 22:16, Matthew Brush a écrit : > Hi, Hey, > I started working on keybindings again for GeanyPy and I was hoping to > get a little advice from the experts. Experts? OK, I don't feel concerned :D > I've hacked together some code that allows the single GeanyPy plugin to > create new

Re: [Geany-devel] SF.net SVN: geany:[5909] trunk/src/utils.c

2011-09-12 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 12/09/2011 16:21, Colomban Wendling a écrit : > [...] > > What about the attached implementation? Hum, with the attachment now. diff --git a/src/utils.c b/src/utils.c index 416cf50..7110154 100644 --- a/src/utils.c +++ b/src/utils.c @@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ #include "dialogs.h"

Re: [Geany-devel] SF.net SVN: geany:[5909] trunk/src/utils.c

2011-09-12 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 12/09/2011 15:33, Frank Lanitz a écrit : > Am 12.09.2011 15:28, schrieb Colomban Wendling: >> Le 12/09/2011 11:16, Lex Trotman a écrit : >>>> Otherwise the whole fallback should be removed since it is confusing >>>> and may not run the browser the user expecte

Re: [Geany-devel] SF.net SVN: geany:[5909] trunk/src/utils.c

2011-09-12 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 12/09/2011 11:16, Lex Trotman a écrit : >> Otherwise the whole fallback should be removed since it is confusing >> and may not run the browser the user expected (depending on the order >> in the list). At least when there is only the tools pref you know >> when its wrong, the browser won't go,

Re: [Geany-devel] SF.net SVN: geany:[5909] trunk/src/utils.c

2011-09-12 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 12/09/2011 11:09, Lex Trotman a écrit : > On 12 September 2011 18:16, Frank Lanitz wrote: >> Am 11.09.2011 23:53, schrieb Colomban Wendling: >>> Le 11/09/2011 23:32, Lex Trotman a écrit : >>>> [...] >>>> >>>> What about adding chrome? >

Re: [Geany-devel] SF.net SVN: geany:[5909] trunk/src/utils.c

2011-09-12 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 12/09/2011 10:16, Frank Lanitz a écrit : > Am 11.09.2011 23:53, schrieb Colomban Wendling: >> Le 11/09/2011 23:32, Lex Trotman a écrit : >>> [...] >>> >>> What about adding chrome? >> >> Yeah, why not (though this list is a fallback one), it

Re: [Geany-devel] SF.net SVN: geany:[5909] trunk/src/utils.c

2011-09-12 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 12/09/2011 04:49, Lex Trotman a écrit : > On 12 September 2011 12:30, Matthew Brush wrote: >> On 09/11/2011 02:53 PM, Colomban Wendling wrote: >>> >>> Le 11/09/2011 23:32, Lex Trotman a écrit : >>>> >>>> [...] >>>> >>>>

Re: [Geany-devel] geany on github; why not?

2011-09-11 Thread Colomban Wendling
Hey, Le 05/09/2011 23:05, Jiří Techet a écrit : > [...] > > Hi, > > I've finally had some time to experiment a bit more with the svn->git > conversion and I'm quite satisfied with the result. This is what I > did: > > [...] I've not much to add that wasn't already said, but it looks really goo

Re: [Geany-devel] SF.net SVN: geany:[5909] trunk/src/utils.c

2011-09-11 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 11/09/2011 23:32, Lex Trotman a écrit : > [...] > > What about adding chrome? Yeah, why not (though this list is a fallback one), it's very easy now :) We might then also want to add also Safari, Epihpany (GNOME) and Midori (Xfce)... does anybody knows if "safari" runs Safari under MacOSX, or

Re: [Geany-devel] geany on github; why not?

2011-08-31 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 31/08/2011 18:18, Frank Lanitz a écrit : > Am 31.08.2011 17:21, schrieb Colomban Wendling: >> 3) We won't probably be able to create Git tags from the SVN tags >> because they (at least Geany-0_18 do) don't all tag a single commit >> (e.g. it's a branch) &g

Re: [Geany-devel] geany on github; why not?

2011-08-31 Thread Colomban Wendling
g/non-working: 1) as expected, it doesn't make merges looks like merges, but as a single commit. However Thomas said on IRC that SVN didn't knew merges either, maybe it makes this impossible to track then? 2) I've got a full commiters list, hopefully OK (that's the only useful p

Re: [Geany-devel] geany on github; why not?

2011-08-27 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 27/08/2011 20:27, Frank Lanitz a écrit : > On Sat, 27 Aug 2011 18:02:41 +0200 > Colomban Wendling wrote: > >> Le 22/08/2011 00:27, Jiří Techet a écrit : >>> [...] >>> >>> Well, in my opinion the whole topic of git transition is >>> over-discu

Re: [Geany-devel] geany on github; why not?

2011-08-27 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 22/08/2011 00:27, Jiří Techet a écrit : > [...] > > Well, in my opinion the whole topic of git transition is > over-discussed. Looks the same for me, and I didn't see much new POV or useful infos since a bunch of emails. > The reason why I haven't been very active on Geany's > mailing list ar

Re: [Geany-devel] Default snippets

2011-08-26 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 26/08/2011 14:49, Alexander Eberspächer a écrit : > Hey Lex, hello list, > > On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 22:04:01 +1000 > Lex Trotman wrote: > >> Maybe you should preserve default behavior on the basis that someone >> decided it to be that way, unless you know no one cares. > > I want to make my poin

Re: [Geany-devel] Per-filetype indentation settings

2011-08-25 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 23/08/2011 07:11, Lex Trotman a écrit : > On 22 August 2011 22:57, Colomban Wendling wrote: >> [...] >> However it'd be easy to add "auto-detect" to indentation type and width >> selection menus -- though indentation width detection doesn't w

Re: [Geany-devel] Use of Scintilla word boundaries for word searches

2011-08-22 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 22/08/2011 19:16, Dimitar Zhekov a écrit : > On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 14:43:35 +0200 > Colomban Wendling wrote: > >>> Uhm, I mean for FIF grep decides about the word boundaries, which may be >>> different to GEANY_WORDCHARS and everything discussed here, no? >&g

Re: [Geany-devel] Per-filetype indentation settings

2011-08-22 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 22/08/2011 03:28, Lex Trotman a écrit : > [...] >>> Well in the new scheme its the only time the user can tell Geany to >>> use detect when its not the usual preference, unless we add it to the >>> set indent menu, which is probably the better option. >> >> Well, if the user haven't chosen auto-

Re: [Geany-devel] Use of Scintilla word boundaries for word searches

2011-08-22 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 22/08/2011 13:15, Thomas Martitz a écrit : > Am 22.08.2011 12:59, schrieb Lex Trotman: >> On 22 August 2011 20:14, Thomas Martitz >> wrote: >>> Just curious. How does search for whole words in find in files adds >>> to this >>> mix? IIUC it uses grep's -w option? >> Only in that it uses the sa

Re: [Geany-devel] Use of Scintilla word boundaries for word searches

2011-08-22 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 22/08/2011 03:14, Lex Trotman a écrit : > [...] >>> As Colomban said it is too much work to make tagmanager and lexer use >>> the same data, but IMHO if they disagree then its a bug, since >>> programming languages clearly define what is what Dimitar called >>> symbols. >> >> Yes, if tagmanager

Re: [Geany-devel] Use of Scintilla word boundaries for word searches

2011-08-21 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 20/08/2011 20:02, Dimitar Zhekov a écrit : > On Sat, 20 Aug 2011 19:45:36 +0200 > Colomban Wendling wrote: > [...] >> I think I'll commit it, we could unify the thing later anyway if we find >> a clear and working unified method. No objections? > >

Re: [Geany-devel] Per-filetype indentation settings

2011-08-21 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 21/08/2011 05:22, Lex Trotman a écrit : > [...] >> Makes sense. >> >> So if setting the filetype for a file that had no one set [1], apply the >> indent settings hierarchy, otherwise do nothing. Maybe we should do the >> same as on open, so also do auto-detection? > > If the indentation settin

Re: [Geany-devel] Use of Scintilla word boundaries for word searches

2011-08-21 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 21/08/2011 05:07, Lex Trotman a écrit : > Hi Guys, > > So to summarise the thread: > > 1. Natural language word breaks are hard, we don't want to go there. > > Refer to http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr29/ from which I quote > "programmatic text boundaries can match user perceptions quite > c

Re: [Geany-devel] Use of Scintilla word boundaries for word searches

2011-08-20 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 20/08/2011 20:56, Dimitar Zhekov a écrit : > On Sat, 20 Aug 2011 20:19:56 +0200 > Colomban Wendling wrote: > >>> For Scintilla/Geany, "boza" or "боза", enclosed in non-ascii >>> quotes, is not a word any more. >> >> Ah OK, got it.

Re: [Geany-devel] Use of Scintilla word boundaries for word searches

2011-08-20 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 20/08/2011 20:02, Dimitar Zhekov a écrit : > On Sat, 20 Aug 2011 19:45:36 +0200 > Colomban Wendling wrote: > >>> Scintilla does it... oh, wait. Neither scintilla nor scite can find >>> the word in ‘боза’, or even ‘boza’ (grep does, for 8-bit text). >> >>

Re: [Geany-devel] Use of Scintilla word boundaries for word searches

2011-08-20 Thread Colomban Wendling
an find the > word in ‘боза’, or even ‘boza’ (grep does, for 8-bit text). *Gee*. Not sure I get it? > On Sat, 20 Aug 2011 16:46:16 +0200 > Colomban Wendling wrote: > >> Actually (as supposed in another mail), I guess that a "word" in >> Scintilla's opinio

Re: [Geany-devel] Plugin Version control (explained?)

2011-08-20 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 19/08/2011 08:40, Frank Lanitz a écrit : > On Fri, 19 Aug 2011 10:02:23 +1000 > Lex Trotman wrote: > > [...] >>> This would avoid having a broken getter in the API (or whatever) >>> that we don't notice just because the core doesn't use it. >> >> With the past non-proactive adding of things to

Re: [Geany-devel] Plugin Version control (explained?)

2011-08-20 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 19/08/2011 02:02, Lex Trotman a écrit : > [...] >>> 3. interface wrapper functions should be used to hide the >>> implementation and side effects. >> >> What do you mean by "interface wrapper functions"? > > In a situation where Geany does something by calling a few local > static functions or

Re: [Geany-devel] msgwindow double click

2011-08-20 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 20/08/2011 16:04, Lex Trotman a écrit : > Hi Dimitar, > >> My proposition: >> >> 1. Opens the file, if not already open; that makes it's tab active >> (same as before). >> 2. Stores the old filename and position. >> 2. Attempts to seek to the new position. >> 3. If successful [which implies t

Re: [Geany-devel] Per-filetype indentation settings

2011-08-20 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 15/08/2011 14:00, Lex Trotman a écrit : > Hi Colomban, > > [...] >>> Settings should take the value of the most specific setting present, >>> ie individual file specific, user filetype specific, system filetype >>> specific, user general preference, system general setting/default >>> value. If

Re: [Geany-devel] Use of Scintilla word boundaries for word searches

2011-08-20 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 20/08/2011 15:58, Lex Trotman a écrit : > On 20 August 2011 23:11, Dimitar Zhekov wrote: >> […] >> Scintilla and regex use charsets, so we can't jump beyond that. Sorry, > > I agree, thats what I said above, but therefore it doesn't do words as > in natural language words, so what exactly do y

Re: [Geany-devel] Use of Scintilla word boundaries for word searches

2011-08-20 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 19/08/2011 19:40, Dimitar Zhekov a écrit : > On Fri, 19 Aug 2011 18:10:42 +0200 > Colomban Wendling wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I'm trying to address bug 3386129 [1], and I'd like comments & reviews >> about my fix, because the whole thing don't

Re: [Geany-devel] Use of Scintilla word boundaries for word searches

2011-08-20 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 20/08/2011 01:33, Lex Trotman a écrit : > On 20 August 2011 03:40, Dimitar Zhekov wrote: >> On Fri, 19 Aug 2011 18:10:42 +0200 >> Colomban Wendling wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'm trying to address bug 3386129 [1], and I'd like comments

Re: [Geany-devel] geany on github; why not?

2011-08-19 Thread Colomban Wendling
Just a few thoughts : Le 20/08/2011 01:40, Matthew Brush a écrit : > On 08/19/2011 03:28 PM, Frank Lanitz wrote: >> [...] >> >> P.S. And yes, I still don't see any good reasons for a change as the >> issues we currently are experiencing, e.g. low an resources for code >> review will not be solved

Re: [Geany-devel] geany on github; why not?

2011-08-19 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 19/08/2011 23:11, Frank Lanitz a écrit : > On Fri, 19 Aug 2011 08:57:36 -0500 > Josh wrote: > >> @Lex: That makes sense. After this weekend I'll still have time, but >> it'll be more sparse. I'd like to be a part of it; so let me know what >> we/I need to do to get this going. Thanks! > >

[Geany-devel] Use of Scintilla word boundaries for word searches

2011-08-19 Thread Colomban Wendling
Hi, I'm trying to address bug 3386129 [1], and I'd like comments & reviews about my fix, because the whole thing don't look obvious at all... We already have 2 ways of determining what a "word" is: a manual one using GEANY_WORDCHARS or a caller-given list of wordchars, and one that uses Scintilla

Re: [Geany-devel] Possible infinite loop?

2011-08-19 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 19/08/2011 12:16, Matthew Brush a écrit : > Hi, > > I have no idea why, but for some reason if I have my filetype set to C, > with my Geany API tags loaded (and the other ones from the Wiki), when I > typed the following, I get Geany locking up: > > GeanyDocument *doc; > doc = document

Re: [Geany-devel] Plugin Version control (explained?)

2011-08-18 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 18/08/2011 07:16, Matthew Brush a écrit : > On 08/17/2011 08:56 PM, Lex Trotman wrote: >> [...] >> >> But a bit of a pain to go back and do the existing ones, unless we >> decide to make them all since some arbitary API number and then do it >> right after that. >> > > Agreed, something like: >

Re: [Geany-devel] Plugin Version control (explained?)

2011-08-18 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 17/08/2011 07:37, Lex Trotman a écrit : > Hi All, > > Given that the previous thread had moved way off topic, I started this one. > > After thinking about it a bit, considering Matthew's, Colomban's and > Thomas's comments and looking at other systems I came to the > understanding documented b

Re: [Geany-devel] Adding a list of filetypes into devel documentation?

2011-08-16 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 16/08/2011 10:05, Lex Trotman a écrit : > On 16 August 2011 12:19, Matthew Brush wrote: >> On 08/15/2011 03:45 PM, Lex Trotman wrote: If I get some time, I could try and do this. Is anybody opposed to putting the API docs in reStructuredText files and generating the API doc

Re: [Geany-devel] msgwin line and column position [was: Expose yellow wavy line in GeanyIndicators]

2011-08-14 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 15/08/2011 01:05, Lex Trotman a écrit : >> It's IMHO important not to depend on GNU grep, AFAIK even BSDs will not >> have it, at least by default (though maybe the implement some of the GNU >> grep's features, don't know). >> > > +1 > >>> [...] > >> >> -fshow-column >> > > There is a docume

Re: [Geany-devel] msgwin line and column position [was: Expose yellow wavy line in GeanyIndicators]

2011-08-14 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 14/08/2011 10:12, Lex Trotman a écrit : > [...] >>> Yes, I was thinking of (ab)using the colour markings for this purpose, >>> but we have already had problems with non-gnu grep, so maybe leave >>> this until later. >> >> Perhaps just include gnu grep with geany if we're in fact depend on it? >

Re: [Geany-devel] Per-filetype indentation settings

2011-08-14 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 14/08/2011 06:54, Lex Trotman a écrit : > Hi Colomban, > > On 14 August 2011 06:17, Colomban Wendling wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Recent bug report #3390435 [1] remembered me about per-filetype >> indentation settings. This would remove hard-coded settings we ha

Re: [Geany-devel] msgwindow double click

2011-08-13 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 11/08/2011 15:55, Dimitar Zhekov a écrit : > On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 00:14:02 +0200 > Colomban Wendling wrote: > >> Le 10/08/2011 12:02, Dimitar Zhekov a écrit : >> >>> It was requested in the mailing list, twice IIRC, for double-clicking >>> into Compil

Re: [Geany-devel] Broken geany-plugins build

2011-08-13 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 13/08/2011 15:18, Enrico Tröger a écrit : > On Wed, 03 Aug 2011 15:20:26 +, colomb...@users.sourceforge.net > wrote: > >> Revision: 5882 >> http://geany.svn.sourceforge.net/geany/?rev=5882&view=rev >> Author: colombanw >> Date: 2011-08-03 15:20:26 + (Wed, 03 Aug 2011) >>

Re: [Geany-devel] msgwindow double click

2011-08-10 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 10/08/2011 12:02, Dimitar Zhekov a écrit : > Hi, Hi, > It was requested in the mailing list, twice IIRC, for double-clicking > into Compiler or Messages tab to not only open the file and seek into > it, but also focus the editor window. That makes sense, IMHO, since > pressing Space opens and

Re: [Geany-devel] Me, Geany and the future

2011-08-10 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 10/08/2011 11:53, Dimitar Zhekov a écrit : > On Tue, 9 Aug 2011 20:38:27 +0200 > Enrico Tröger wrote: > > [...] > >> I talked to Nick before and he feels the same way basically. > > With Nick also gone, I'd better step up and try to fix some known > bugs, handle some simple feature requests

Re: [Geany-devel] Me, Geany and the future

2011-08-10 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 10/08/2011 06:25, Lex Trotman a écrit : > Hi Enrico, > > [...] >> I'd like to find a new project maintainer who keeps the development >> going on, coordinate the project with the community, reviews patches, >> makes releases and so on. >> The first candidate is of course Colomban if he wants. T

Re: [Geany-devel] Me, Geany and the future

2011-08-10 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 09/08/2011 22:27, Matthew Brush a écrit : > On 08/09/11 11:38, Enrico Tröger wrote: >> [...] >> >> I'd like to find a new project maintainer who keeps the development >> going on, coordinate the project with the community, reviews patches, >> makes releases and so on. >> The first candidate is o

Re: [Geany-devel] Me, Geany and the future

2011-08-10 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 09/08/2011 20:38, Enrico Tröger a écrit : > Hey guys, > > as you certainly noticed, I didn't do any development nor replying > mails regarding Geany. This is mostly because I tend to spend my spare > time on other things (more offline activities and such). > While this is good for me (:D), it s

Re: [Geany-devel] either uninitialized variable or a redundant condition

2011-08-06 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 06/08/2011 16:03, Daniel Marjamäki a écrit : > Hi! Hi, > [src/tools.c:127]: (information) Suspecting that uninitialized > variable is used: stock_id > > Either there is an "uninitialized variable" issue or else there is a > redundant condition. > > In the file src/tools.c. > > The condition

Re: [Geany-devel] RFC: uninitialized variable in theoretical execution path.

2011-08-06 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 06/08/2011 16:02, Daniel Marjamäki a écrit : > Hi! Hi, > I wonder what you think about fixing "uninitialized variable" issues > for theoretical execution paths. > > What I mean with "theoretical" is that it is not assumed that > parameters and global variables are restricted to the "possible"

Re: [Geany-devel] various prefs - statusbar_template

2011-06-24 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 24/06/2011 01:40, Lex Trotman a écrit : >> RFC. I'm against option 3. >> > > The various prefs is only providing more convenient editing of > "hidden" (lets say less often used) prefs so I vote for 1. > > If it is desired for a pref to have "smart" handling then it should be > moved out of var

Re: [Geany-devel] GIO saving made configurable?

2011-06-20 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 20/06/2011 00:49, Lex Trotman a écrit : >> Just tell me -- what's the advantages of 2 over 3 then? OK, it wouldn't >> depend on gvfs-fuse. > > Yes, and it is safe (I think) if it keeps the backup file. True. And it would be safe against write failures with GEdit's hack or similar. >>> [...] >

Re: [Geany-devel] Plugins: Bump dependencies also to GTK 2.12 / GLIB 2.16?

2011-06-19 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 13/06/2011 23:12, Frank Lanitz a écrit : > Hi developers, > > As currently the dependencies for Geany are getting bumped to GTK 2.12 > and GLIB 2.16 I'm wondering whether we should also bump dependencies of > current devel version of geany-plugins to Geany 0.21 and with this step > also to thi

Re: [Geany-devel] GIO saving made configurable?

2011-06-19 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 19/06/2011 14:41, Lex Trotman a écrit : >> I think so too. >> I'm only afraid how to give this choice to the user. This needs to be >> well documented and probably should go into a normal. not hidden pref >> and so should be in the preferences dialog. >> > > Yes, thats a bit of a problem, summa

Re: [Geany-devel] Compiler warnings

2011-06-18 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 18/06/2011 16:46, Frank Lanitz a écrit : > Hi folks, > > Didn't had any deeper check but with recent svn I'm getting these > compiler warnings on build with waf > > [...] > > Its a Debian/Unstable here running on AMD64. Oops, my bad. I changed StashWidgetID to be gconstpointer rather than

[Geany-devel] GIO saving made configurable?

2011-06-13 Thread Colomban Wendling
Hi, During the phase of removing code that is not relevant anymore since the dependency bump, I fatally came out to write_data_to_disk(). Now we can assume we have GIO, it may seem sensible to drop completely the C API file saving code... ...However, GIO saving seems to cause some problems on so

Re: [Geany-devel] Bumping Geany's GTK minimum requirement to 2.12

2011-06-13 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 13/06/2011 19:45, Enrico Tröger a écrit : > On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 19:38:23 +0200, Colomban wrote: > >> Le 13/06/2011 18:55, Frank Lanitz a écrit : >>> On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:26:06 +0200 >>> Enrico Tröger wrote: >>> On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 16:45:38 +0200, Colomban wrote: > Le 04/05/2011

Re: [Geany-devel] Bumping Geany's GTK minimum requirement to 2.12

2011-06-13 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 13/06/2011 18:55, Frank Lanitz a écrit : > On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:26:06 +0200 > Enrico Tröger wrote: > >> On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 16:45:38 +0200, Colomban wrote: >> >>> Le 04/05/2011 23:00, Enrico Tröger a écrit : Hi, any objections in increasing the GTK minimum requirement of Geany

Re: [Geany-devel] Bumping Geany's GTK minimum requirement to 2.12

2011-06-13 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 04/05/2011 23:00, Enrico Tröger a écrit : > Hi, > > any objections in increasing the GTK minimum requirement of Geany to > GTK 2.12 (and GLib 2.16)? > > [...] Any new on the subject? Should we go on an start moving? Cheers, Colomban ___ Geany-devel

Re: [Geany-devel] [PATCH] In messages show the actual text user entered in Find and Replace dialogs

2011-06-03 Thread Colomban Wendling
Hi, Le 03/06/2011 09:47, Eugene Arshinov a écrit : > On Sat, 21 May 2011 12:16:59 +0400 > Eugene Arshinov wrote: > [...] > > Hi. > > Aren't these patches forgotten? Not really forgotten, but since I don't find that much time these days to review patches & stuff (you might have noticed ^^), I d

Re: [Geany-devel] [CODE REVIEW] Changes to encodings

2011-05-18 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 18/05/2011 02:15, Matthew Brush a écrit : > On 05/17/11 08:40, Colomban Wendling wrote: >> 2) the space is useless in "[:= ]" since it'd be matched just after > > I'll trust you on this :) Hum, actually you shouldn't I was wrong, it has not the same me

Re: [Geany-devel] [CODE REVIEW] Changes to encodings

2011-05-18 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 18/05/2011 02:05, Matthew Brush a écrit : > On 05/17/11 08:30, Colomban Wendling wrote: >> Le 16/05/2011 05:45, Matthew Brush a écrit : >> >>> I was wondering if anyone had time to review some changes I've been >>> working on? >> >> No really

Re: [Geany-devel] [CODE REVIEW] Changes to encodings

2011-05-17 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 16/05/2011 08:37, Matthew Brush a écrit : > On 05/15/11 20:45, Matthew Brush wrote: > >> The second one is a simple refactoring of the code around the >> regex-based encoding detection and adding a few more patterns to detect >> a few more types of files. Especially needing review are the actua

Re: [Geany-devel] [CODE REVIEW] Changes to encodings

2011-05-17 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 16/05/2011 05:45, Matthew Brush a écrit : > Hi all, Hey. A bit later, but I finally managed to find some time reading your patches. Below is basically only some comments on the patches, you already discussed some points with Lex, I won't add anything on what was said when I don't think I have s

Re: [Geany-devel] [PATCH] In messages show the actual text user entered in Find and Replace dialogs

2011-05-17 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 15/05/2011 14:29, Eugene Arshinov a écrit : > Hi. > > When "Escape sequences" checkbox is checked in Find or Replace dialog, > before escaping the find and replace strings we should save the > original ones, so that they can be used in messages shown to user and in > the history of those dialog

Re: [Geany-devel] Fix crash and memory leak in treebrowser.c.

2011-05-12 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 12/05/2011 21:54, Enzo Matrix a écrit : > Hello, > > sorry for my laggy response, i have no possibilities to apply and commit > the patch in short time, (i am replacing linux with windows last month > :( for a while, for doing msaccess and msexcel diploma work). > If anybody have spare time to

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   >