On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:26:06 +0200
Enrico Tröger wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 16:45:38 +0200, Colomban wrote:
>
> >Le 04/05/2011 23:00, Enrico Tröger a écrit :
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> any objections in increasing the GTK minimum requirement of Geany
> >> to GTK 2.12 (and GLib 2.16)?
> >>
> >> [...]
Hi,
On Sun, 5 Jun 2011 19:26:16 +0200
Frank Lanitz wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 10:54:18 +0200
> Frank Lanitz wrote:
>
> > Based on that list I will create a poll upcoming weekend (around
> > June, 4th) - I will announce tis inside another mail with some
> >
Am 06.06.2011 00:07, schrieb Maciej Ciemborowicz:
> As we all know, first version of the wishlist wasn't prepared for such
> big number of future requests. So it had to be closed. Now people may
> post them at the Sourceforge tracker. But it also isn't too readable. So
> here is my idea:
>
> 1. Us
Hi,
On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 10:54:18 +0200
Frank Lanitz wrote:
> Based on that list I will create a poll upcoming weekend (around June,
> 4th) - I will announce tis inside another mail with some basic rules.
I've just started the poll with all options given inside the wi
Hi,
You might have recognized that there have been a discussion on which
markuplangauge/technique we will use for future Geany newsletter to
write and create PDF/HTML/other output formats in.
During this discussion a lot of different languages and ways have been
suggested so decision is not easy.
On Fri, 27 May 2011 14:31:29 -0700
Matthew Brush wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Would it be useful for someone with admin rights on SourceForge.net
> to create a "Patch Tracker"? I've seen some projects with this[1].
>
> [1] https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=6556&atid=306556
I thought collecting th
Am 24.05.2011 10:04, schrieb Lex Trotman:
> Just need to find out how to set max-width for these pages.
This can and should be only done in a valid way by a theme for the wiki
which needs to be provided by anybody.
Cheers,
Frank
___
Geany-devel mailing
Am 22.05.2011 16:50, schrieb Enrico Tröger:
> I don't like linking to yet another document. If you are in the Wiki,
> you want just information, not download and open another document. IMO
> this is quite distracting and unnecessarily circumstantial.
> I really don't want to have your great docs in
ted in cooperation by people from
Geany's international community. Contributors to this newsletter and
the infrastructure behind it, ordered by alphabet:
Colomban Wendling,
Dominic Hopf,
Enrico Tröger,
Frank Lanitz,
Matthew Brush,
Nicholas Manea,
Russell Dickenson
pgp5oSHAE4Oab.pgp
Descri
Am 18.05.2011 16:45, schrieb Frank Lanitz:
> Am 18.05.2011 16:28, schrieb Matthew Brush:
>> On 05/18/11 01:22, Frank Lanitz wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Not sure whether this is the best idea, but I've jsut created a page
>>> inside the wiki at
Am 18.05.2011 16:28, schrieb Matthew Brush:
> On 05/18/11 01:22, Frank Lanitz wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Not sure whether this is the best idea, but I've jsut created a page
>> inside the wiki at http://wiki.geany.org/patches/review_list where we
>> could col
Am 18.05.2011 14:26, schrieb Randy Kramer:
> All,
>
> Lex and I have had a little bit of off-line conversation about his
> document, the Build System User Guide. He suggested that I put it on
> the wiki.
>
> I made a feeble attempt, and now recommend instead that, at least on a
> temporary
Hi,
Not sure whether this is the best idea, but I've jsut created a page
inside the wiki at http://wiki.geany.org/patches/review_list where we
could collect patches/patchsets to just keep an overview as it appears
on this mailing list some patches might get lost due lot of
traffic/discussion. Tell
Am 12.05.2011 22:58, schrieb Colomban Wendling:
> Le 12/05/2011 21:54, Enzo Matrix a écrit :
>> Hello,
>>
>> sorry for my laggy response, i have no possibilities to apply and commit
>> the patch in short time, (i am replacing linux with windows last month
>> :( for a while, for doing msaccess and m
Am 09.05.2011 20:25, schrieb Oliver Krystal:
> Just tried this with the nightlies on windows, and it doesn't crash or
> anything like that. None off the right click functions work in the
> split off window.
I can second this (Windows7 64Bit running 32Bit Geany)
Also the copy from second window is
Am 03.05.2011 03:54, schrieb Matthew Brush:
> Hi,
>
> I was thinking it would be useful to have a template directory with all
> the "boiler-plate" for a Geany plugin under version control to get
> people started quicker writing a new plugin that could become part of
> the Geany Plugins project eas
Am 10.05.2011 01:54, schrieb Lex Trotman:
>>> Now done. Sorry for the long delay, and thanks again for the hard work!
>>
>> Cool, so we don't need to change the newsletter at this point ;)
>>
>
> Hey, new workflow, get a new feature described in the newsletter and
> then it will be added to Geany
Am 09.05.2011 15:34, schrieb Colomban Wendling:
> Le 05/05/2011 16:45, Matthew Brush a écrit :
>> On 05/05/11 02:11, Frank Lanitz wrote:
>>
>>> My understanding was that this has been fixed and now is working also on
>>> Windows. What is pending here?
>>
>
Am 09.05.2011 15:27, schrieb Colomban Wendling:
> Le 08/05/2011 23:18, Matthew Brush a écrit :
>> On 05/08/11 10:08, Colomban Wendling wrote:
>>
>>> just need to re-apply the commits:
>>>
>>> http://git.geany.org/geany/commit/?id=757654e14b40d85c95c50ab422e3bcd63fa7fd29
>>>
>>> http://git.geany.org
On Wed, 4 May 2011 18:41:41 -0400
Nicholas Manea wrote:
> Never mind, I've figured it out :)
>
> I've attached some patches that fix a typo and a formatting issue at
> the end.
I've put them into git. Thanks ;)
Cheers,
Frank
--
http://frank.uvena.de/en/
pgp80VJciuTB3.pgp
Description: PGP s
Am 04.05.2011 22:53, schrieb Enrico Tröger:
> I'd say let's make a 0.20.1 bugfix release soon.
> So we can release the fixes made since the 0.20 release for users.
>
> If no one beats me by time, I'll create a 0.20.1 branch based on the
> 0.20 tag on Sunday and then we can backport relevant fixes.
Am 05.05.2011 07:17, schrieb Lex Trotman:
> On 5 May 2011 15:00, Matthew Brush wrote:
>> On 05/04/11 01:09, Frank Lanitz wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi folks,
>>>
>>> About two month ago we released issues 1 of Geany newsletter and we are
>>> thinking of d
Am 01.05.2011 02:51, schrieb Lex Trotman:
> On 1 May 2011 10:37, Matthew Brush wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> In reference to the recent post on the scintilla-interest mailing list
>> posting with the same title[1].
>>
>> Would this affect Geany's support for older GTK+ versions?
>
>
> Neil states that it
Hi folks,
About two month ago we released issues 1 of Geany newsletter and we are
thinking of doing a new one upcoming week. Not all work is done yet,
some contents are missing (mea culpa e.g. some parts I wanted to write)
as well as some optical corrections needs to be done on both, HTML and
PDF
Am 03.05.2011 10:43, schrieb Matthew Brush:
> On 05/03/11 00:21, Frank Lanitz wrote:
>> Am 03.05.2011 03:28, schrieb Matthew Brush:
>>>
>>> Anyway, I thought others might be interested to see these numbers, since
>>> I couldn't find them through SF/otherwis
Am 03.05.2011 03:28, schrieb Matthew Brush:
> Hi,
>
> I was curious about the statistics for the Geany project so I hacked
> together some Python code to peel out some values from the SVN log. If
> anyone cares, the following are some of what I found:
>
> Total commits:
> eht16: 2466
> ntrel
Am 28.04.2011 09:47, schrieb Matthew Brush:
> On 04/28/11 00:10, Frank Lanitz wrote:
>
>> However, I recognized tons of compiler warnings which did make me upset.
>> I know, many of them might not be any dangerous but I really like to ask
>> you to to have a look onto i
Am 28.04.2011 09:32, schrieb Matthew Brush:
> On 04/28/11 00:01, Frank Lanitz wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Am 12.03.2011 19:11, schrieb Frank Lanitz:
>>> During the last weeks a huge number mails at this list was stating to
>>> make usage of GObject on building
Hi Plugins-Devs,
As you might did see I did some work during the weekend to fix make
check (and break it during this also again ;) ) as well as did some
minor code changes where I thought they don't hurt much but would
improve something.
However, I recognized tons of compiler warnings which
Hi,
Am 12.03.2011 19:11, schrieb Frank Lanitz:
During the last weeks a huge number mails at this list was stating to
make usage of GObject on building up a new plugin interface. It has been
talked about libpeas and adding support for Vala, Python etc. Before we
do discuss any further I'd
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 11:18:16 +0200
Jiří Techet wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 15:03, Jiří Techet wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > first sorry for disappearing for such a long time - I didn't have
> > much free time left in the past months and from the time I had I
> > dedicated most of it to the libcham
On Tue, 19 Apr 2011 17:50:33 +0100
WILLIAM FRASER wrote:
> Yes, it would. I'm not sure how soon to to remove geanycfp though.
> I've not
> done any major re-coding, and have not encountered any bugs, but I'm
> not sure when to remove geanycfp from Geany-Plugins.
Well, if all functions are moved
Am 19.04.2011 09:12, schrieb Lex Trotman:
On 19 April 2011 16:50, Frank Lanitz wrote:
Am 14.04.2011 22:29, schrieb Liviu Andronic:
Does Geany have a hex mode, that is can I open files in hex mode?
And a bit more OT, Geany refuses to force-open a PDF file. Nano, for
example, opens the PDF
Am 14.04.2011 22:29, schrieb Liviu Andronic:
Does Geany have a hex mode, that is can I open files in hex mode?
And a bit more OT, Geany refuses to force-open a PDF file. Nano, for
example, opens the PDF. Is it normal?
As already mentioned, this is intended behavior due Scintilla. But maybe
th
amily emergencies, and I've a major exam looming, so
may be a little slow for the next month or so.
However, welcome back ;)
Frank Lanitz suggested splitting geanycfp into separate plugins. I think
this makes sense for several reasons: by splitting it into GeanyMacros,
and GeanyNumberedBo
On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 20:37:01 +0200
Colomban Wendling wrote:
> Le 14/04/2011 19:15, Frank Lanitz a écrit :
> > Hi,
>
> Hi Frank,
>
> > On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 21:55:31 +
> > colomb...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
> >
> >> Revision: 5724
> >
--but close to 10 years ago, now), but I'm pretty sure it would
> > *not* be a good idea to change them each time the document is saved.
>
> Apologies if it was unclear, but after the {date} or {datetime} marker
> is *replaced* by the date/time the first time it no longer exis
Hi,
On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 21:55:31 +
colomb...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
> Revision: 5724
> http://geany.svn.sourceforge.net/geany/?rev=5724&view=rev
> Author: colombanw
> Date: 2011-04-13 21:55:31 + (Wed, 13 Apr 2011)
>
> Log Message:
> ---
> Avoid triggering a
Hi,
After long time I'm doing some maintenance work on geanyVC and
now I'm interested which VCS are used by the users. Therefor I did
create a doodle at http://www.doodle.com/5d7mi43raww2wnrq I'd like to
ask you to insert which of the supported VCS you are using.
Thanks in advance ;)
On Sat, 9 Apr 2011 11:17:20 +1000
Lex Trotman wrote:
> > But CC-BY is allowing this. Maybe CC-BY-SA would be a more GPL-like
> > flavor of CC.
>
> Yes, CC-BY allows modification. IIUC CC-BY-SA would preclude any more
> than "fair use" quantities of material anywhere that is not itself
> license
On Sat, 9 Apr 2011 10:01:25 +1000
Lex Trotman wrote:
> On 9 April 2011 08:39, Matthew Brush wrote:
> > On 04/08/11 09:18, Frank Lanitz wrote:
> >>
> >> I just want to ask about which license we shall use for the
> >> newsletter in future. I'd like to pr
On Fri, 8 Apr 2011 13:45:12 -0500
Randy Kramer wrote:
> On Friday 08 April 2011 01:54:13 pm Dominic Hopf wrote:
> > Am Freitag, den 08.04.2011, 18:28 +0200 schrieb Thomas Martitz:
> > > I never heard of licenses for newsletters.
> >
> > Me neither.
>
> Well, it is written material, and, automati
Hi people,
I just want to ask about which license we shall use for the newsletter
in future. I'd like to prefer to put it under terms of one of the
CC-family licenses. CC-BY (by = Geany Newsletter Team) would fit most
IMHO. What's your opinion?
Cheers,
Frank
--
http://frank.uvena.de/en/
pgp
Hi folks,
Its been a month since issue 1 of Geany newsletter has been sent out.
Issue 2 is already having a lot of content even some parts are still
missing. So my question I don't want to decide for my own: When to
release second issue of newsletter? Shall we set up the bimonthly rhythm
as sugges
Am 04.04.2011 09:37, schrieb Matthew Brush:
> On 04/03/11 23:54, Matthew Brush wrote:
>> I wasn't sure how to regenerate the other formats after editing
>> doc/geany.txt so that is not done in these patches.
>
> I've amended my last commit with the generated geany.html if this is needed.
I guess
On Mon, 04 Apr 2011 00:30:32 +0200
Colomban Wendling wrote:
> Le 03/04/2011 23:34, Enrico Tröger a écrit :
> > On Sun, 03 Apr 2011 06:15:54 -0700, Matthew wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> > - on GTK 2.22 and newer, Scintilla now uses Cairo for drawing which
> > results in smaller and differently rendered
On Sun, 03 Apr 2011 14:45:13 +0200
Colomban Wendling wrote:
> Le 03/04/2011 14:37, Lex Trotman a écrit :
> >> Another possibility, but will introduce a huge amount of code which
> >> needs to be maintained, is to make it a build dependency in kind of
> >> switch (#ifdef ...) so it can be turned o
On Sat, 02 Apr 2011 11:58:17 -0700
Matthew Brush wrote:
> On 03/31/11 11:04, Nick Treleaven wrote:
> > Hi list,
> > I received a patch, haven't got around to reviewing it yet.
>
> I tested and it worked fine. My only comment is that it shows the
> text of the 'cd' command, where it would be nic
On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 23:04:44 +1100
Lex Trotman wrote:
> On 27 March 2011 21:09, Alexander Tumin
> wrote:
> > *NOT FOR REAL USE*
> >
> > Just an example how Clang's code completion support may be added to
> > the geany. Code is awful, Makefile.in edited by hand, etc. Usage as
> > is not recommend
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 04:06:10 +0800
Chow Loong Jin wrote:
> Just a heads up, I'm in the process of migrating from my old GPG key
> (0x8f02a4110) to my new one (0x588752a1), so I'll be updating
> http://plugins.geany.org/hyperair-pubkey.txt soon.
>
> Should I refresh the signatures for the previou
On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 21:59:21 -0700
Matthew Brush wrote:
> Should Geany be calling g_thread_init() for the plugins? There is
> now 4 plugins at least affected[1][2][3][4].
I tried to fix this for updatechecker based on a patch by Colomban
and Matthew until there is a better solution available.
On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 02:42:48 -0700
Matthew Brush wrote:
> On 03/27/11 02:36, Frank Lanitz wrote:
> > On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 00:15:42 -0700
> > Matthew Brush wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I recently updated the geany-themes project to use the
On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 00:15:42 -0700
Matthew Brush wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I recently updated the geany-themes project to use the new addition
> from r5596[1]. Should Geany's documentation be updated to explain
> the new feature?
Yepp, would be helpful. Do you like to write some lines for?
Cheers,
F
Am 23.03.2011 13:36, schrieb Lex Trotman:
> On 23 March 2011 23:32, Frank Lanitz wrote:
>> Am 23.03.2011 13:22, schrieb Lex Trotman:
>>> I would suggest that there may be an interaction between real-time tag
>>> parsing that was recently added to the SVN version and Ge
Am 23.03.2011 13:22, schrieb Lex Trotman:
> I would suggest that there may be an interaction between real-time tag
> parsing that was recently added to the SVN version and Geanyprj that
> makes heavy use of tags.
>
> Unfortunately there doesn't seem to be any documentation on real-time
> parsing o
Hi,
Am 14.03.2011 20:11, schrieb Colomban Wendling:
> I just added some automated code checking to the Autotools-based build
> system, after a (quite long) discussion on the Geany development list [1].
I had some issues with these check on my ubuntu virtual test box inside
po folder just positng
On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 13:43:48 +1100
Lex Trotman wrote:
> Of course leaving all the content in
> makes the mailing much larger and its harder to find the new content.
> To combat this learn to use your mailers quoted text hiding features,
> and if it doesn't have them, switch to one that does.
I
Hi,
On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 09:57:36 +0100
Enrico Tröger wrote:
> Do you want to integrate these flags into the build system? I don't
> think this is a good idea. Such flags should be set outside of the
> build system by the developer/user, not automatically.
> This is why they are mentioned in HAC
On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 12:08:32 +0800
Chow Loong Jin wrote:
> You could actually use .git/info/exclude instead for that
> functionality. Then you can use stuff like git clean -fdx, and not
> worry about accidentally purging your .gitignore. .gitignore should
> only be used if you want to commit it i
Geany Newsletter
Volume 1
CC-BY -- The Geany-Newsletter team
Table of Contents
-
1 Geany 0.20 has been released
2 Geany-Plugins 0.20 have beenreleased
2.1 New plugins
2.1.1 UpdateChecker
2.1.2 WebHelper
2.2 Updates & Bugfixes
2.2.1 GeanyExtraSel
2.2.2 GeanyGenD
On Sat, 12 Mar 2011 23:34:56 +0100
Colomban Wendling wrote:
> Maybe we might directly use -Wall, but it warns about some things that
> are not really needed, such as unused functions.
Well, I'd like to get informed about unused functions.
Cheers,
Frank
--
http://frank.uvena.de/en/
pgpFZqI3
Hi guys,
Please give me the chance to point to the world famous usenet quoting
howto at http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
We are here at an mailing list, but most of the rules apply here also.
Reason for this is that I saw a huge number of mails during the last
days, which include
Hi guys,
During the last weeks a huge number mails at this list was stating to
make usage of GObject on building up a new plugin interface. It has been
talked about libpeas and adding support for Vala, Python etc. Before we
do discuss any further I'd like to point to an email Enrico sent
earlier
On Sat, 12 Mar 2011 16:09:29 +0100
Colomban Wendling wrote:
> > This issue is the same
> > for for all other validation tools (valgrind, etc). Actually such
> > maintains bother can be enough reason to abandon geany-plugins and
> > move plugins to somewhere else.
>
> It would probably be sad, and
On Sat, 12 Mar 2011 15:55:52 +0100
Colomban Wendling wrote:
> Le 12/03/2011 10:49, Lex Trotman a écrit :
> > On 12 March 2011 20:21, Frank Lanitz wrote:
> >> On Sat, 12 Mar 2011 02:53:47 +0100
> >> Colomban Wendling wrote:
> >>
> >>>> Maaayb
On Sat, 12 Mar 2011 20:49:10 +1100
Lex Trotman wrote:
> On 12 March 2011 20:21, Frank Lanitz wrote:
> > On Sat, 12 Mar 2011 02:53:47 +0100
> > Colomban Wendling wrote:
> >
> >> > Maaaybe, sort of see your point, but not really convinced that
> >> >
On Sat, 12 Mar 2011 02:53:47 +0100
Colomban Wendling wrote:
> > Maaaybe, sort of see your point, but not really convinced that
> > uprating warnings to errors is a good idea on the dev codebase, it
> > stops people trying and testing things.
> Unfortunately, believe me that non-fatal warnings are
On Sat, 12 Mar 2011 12:37:14 +1100
Lex Trotman wrote:
> Of course it should fail the plugin, but as above, not the whole
> build.
I agree.
> And I hope we use "blame" in the non-emotive sense of "identify the
> cause of the problem" :-)
I agree².
Cheers,
Frank
--
http://frank.uvena.de/en/
On Sat, 12 Mar 2011 12:37:14 +1100
Lex Trotman wrote:
> Maaaybe, sort of see your point, but not really convinced that
> uprating warnings to errors is a good idea on the dev codebase, it
> stops people trying and testing things.
I agree. A failing build is more demotivating for some tester as a
On Sat, 12 Mar 2011 12:04:31 +1100
Lex Trotman wrote:
> On 12 March 2011 11:35, Matthew Brush wrote:
> > On 03/11/11 15:24, Frank Lanitz wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 15:28:05 +0300
> >> Alexander Petukhov wrote:
> >>
> >>> 5. Oth
On Sat, 12 Mar 2011 11:51:09 +1100
Lex Trotman wrote:
> > The problem here is that there is currently a plugin that can't be
> > compiled with them, so enabling them would mean disabling the plugin
> > that used to build.
> >
> > Maybe the solution is to wait for Alexander to fix these problems,
On Fri, 11 Mar 2011 15:36:50 -0800
Matthew Brush wrote:
> On 03/11/11 14:43, Frank Lanitz wrote:
> > On Wed, 09 Mar 2011 07:27:06 -0800
> > Matthew Brush wrote:
> >
> >> On 03/09/11 03:42, Frank Lanitz wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>>
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 12:41:54 -0800
Matthew Brush wrote:
> > 4. Removing unsupported plugins from releases
> > what do you think about the following scheme: divide all pluging
> > into:
> > - "supported" (that are acting really well)
> > - "unsupported" or "bad" (having problems) ?
> > So, every g
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 15:28:05 +0300
Alexander Petukhov wrote:
> 5. Other language bindings - don't really think it can increase
> plugins quality dramatically, there can be problems in any language
> that you have to solve in order to make your code work correctly.
I agree. It will might also spl
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 15:28:05 +0300
Alexander Petukhov wrote:
> And one more thing, as a debian user I see that there is still 0.19
> plugins version even in unstable, maybe it's a good idea to move
> current developing version (0.21?) to unstable / testing to make
> debian users to help us in
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 11:10:02 +0100
Thomas Martitz wrote:
> Am 23.02.2011 04:01, schrieb Lex Trotman:
> > Of course on the other hand because the maintainers are volunteers
> > with limited time this process slows changes, but IMHO this is
> > necessary. Having more maintainers for a piece of cod
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011 12:15:03 +1100
Lex Trotman wrote:
> On 10 March 2011 11:57, Thomas Martitz
> wrote:
> > Returning an aggregate is exactly the same as manually allocating
> > the aggregate and passing a pointer to the function (in order to
> > let it fill the aggregate) on most if not all ABI
On Fri, 11 Mar 2011 19:37:14 +0100
Colomban Wendling wrote:
> 2) cppcheck reports an error on geanylatex plugin; but I know Frank
> already fixed this and so has probably only to import the fix in the
> geany-plugins copy.
Yepp. Should be the issue we talked about before.
Cheers,
Frank
--
ht
On Wed, 09 Mar 2011 07:27:06 -0800
Matthew Brush wrote:
> On 03/09/11 03:42, Frank Lanitz wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > Am 23.02.2011 01:10, schrieb Matthew Brush:
> >> Another thing could be to make mandatory that documentation is
> >> existent and cur
On Wed, 9 Mar 2011 20:21:27 +0100
Enrico Tröger wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Mar 2011 20:15:31 +0100, Frank wrote:
>
> >On Wed, 09 Mar 2011 20:07:26 +0100
> >Thomas Martitz wrote:
> >
> >> On 09.03.2011 20:05, Enrico Tröger wrote:
> >> >
> >> > I use SVN, so I don't care much about a .gitignore (read: I'
On Wed, 09 Mar 2011 20:07:26 +0100
Thomas Martitz wrote:
> On 09.03.2011 20:05, Enrico Tröger wrote:
> >
> > I use SVN, so I don't care much about a .gitignore (read: I'm
> > neutral).
> >
> > I just would suggest, if we use a .gitignore as well (assuming
> > replying svn:ignore won't work as exp
Hi,
Am 23.02.2011 01:10, schrieb Matthew Brush:
> Another thing could be to make mandatory that documentation is existent
> and current, up to some standard. I mean for README, manual, and also
> doc-comments in code (ex. each function/global must have a comment or
> something). Some other item
Am 09.03.2011 03:44, schrieb Matthew Brush:
> On 03/08/11 17:55, Thomas Martitz wrote:
>> git-svn supports svn:ignore property, perhaps use that instead. See
>> git svn create-ignore/show-ignore.
> Good to know. But I ran git svn show-ignore and the list of excludes it
> printed doesn't seem nearl
On Tue, 8 Mar 2011 20:01:27 +0100
Enrico Tröger wrote:
> On Tue, 08 Mar 2011 17:10:03 +0100, Frank wrote:
>
> >Am 08.03.2011 16:51, schrieb Росен Стоянов:
> >> Hey guys,
> >>
> >> First of all i want to say that i really appreciate the work you've
> >> been doing on making Geany such a great ID
On Tue, 8 Mar 2011 19:58:16 +0100
Enrico Tröger wrote:
> On Tue, 08 Mar 2011 11:06:16 +0100, Frank wrote:
>
> >Am 23.02.2011 01:10, schrieb Matthew Brush:
> >> For first thing, maybe we could enforce use/passing of those tools
> >> mentioned and these before adding to release, examples:
> >> htt
Am 08.03.2011 16:51, schrieb Росен Стоянов:
> Hey guys,
>
> First of all i want to say that i really appreciate the work you've been
> doing on making Geany such a great IDE. Keep up the good work!
>
> I don't know if this is the right way to do it, but i want to suggest a
> feature for the Task
Am 08.03.2011 16:31, schrieb Thomas Martitz:
> On 08.03.2011 16:26, Matthew Brush wrote:
>>
>> Does this sound reasonable?
>
> Yep, that's the usual git-svn workflow :)
I agree ;)
Cheers,
Frank
___
Geany-devel mailing list
Geany-devel@uvena.de
http://
Am 08.03.2011 15:18, schrieb Thomas Martitz:
> On 08.03.2011 15:15, Frank Lanitz wrote:
>> Am 06.03.2011 14:01, schrieb Thomas Martitz:
>>> Am 06.03.2011 13:36, schrieb Enrico Tröger:
>>>>> 2) Is it possible to continue using Git (on GitHub) and still commit
>&g
Am 06.03.2011 14:01, schrieb Thomas Martitz:
> Am 06.03.2011 13:36, schrieb Enrico Tröger:
>>> 2) Is it possible to continue using Git (on GitHub) and still commit
>>> to geany-projects SVN at the same time (when code on Git is good
>>> enough to go into the official Projects SVN)? I'm pretty new
Am 23.02.2011 01:10, schrieb Matthew Brush:
> For first thing, maybe we could enforce use/passing of those tools
> mentioned and these before adding to release, examples:
> http://www.splint.org/
> http://valgrind.org/info/tools.html
> (suppression for GTK - http://people.gnome.org/~johan/gtk.suppr
Hi friends of Geany,
As you might are aware of it, we started a geany-newsletter project a
couple of weeks ago to create a regular newsletter with compressed
information around Geany, its plugins and environment.
As every project inside FOSS-community there have to be a repository and
some kind
On Sat, 26 Feb 2011 16:45:13 +0100
Colomban Wendling wrote:
> Le 26/02/2011 14:50, Frank Lanitz a écrit :
> > On Sat, 26 Feb 2011 14:21:11 +0100
> > Colomban Wendling wrote:
> >
> >> Le 26/02/2011 13:41, Frank Lanitz a écrit :
> >>> On Wed, 23 Feb 2
On Sat, 26 Feb 2011 14:21:11 +0100
Colomban Wendling wrote:
> Le 26/02/2011 13:41, Frank Lanitz a écrit :
> > On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 19:32:07 +0100
> > Colomban Wendling wrote:
> >
> >> [./geanylatex/src/templates.c:47]: (error) Memory leak: template
> >&
On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 09:06:26 +1100
Lex Trotman wrote:
> On 31 January 2011 02:54, Frank Lanitz wrote:
> > On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 11:31:21 +0300
> > Eugene Arshinov wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 10:20:26 +0100%
> >> weltall wrote:
> >>
> &g
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 19:32:07 +0100
Colomban Wendling wrote:
> [./geanylatex/src/templates.c:47]: (error) Memory leak: template
>
> I also attach here the fixes I propose for them, if you're interested.
I'm afraid I don't see why this should be a memory leak. Can you please
be so kind and go int
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 23:24:50 +0100
Thomas Martitz wrote:
> Am 22.02.2011 23:00, schrieb Frank Lanitz:
> >> I also observed this, and I think that's a major part of the
> >> problem. Hopefully we can code plugins in friendlier languages,
> >> such as Vala or p
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 22:30:40 +0100
Thomas Martitz wrote:
> It's all open source after all, and part of it is working together
> with others on the same code. All of your points contradict with that
> spirit.
I agree. Its all about communication. Unfortunately ;D
> I didn't mean to say I would l
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 21:40:09 +0100
Colomban Wendling wrote:
> Le 22/02/2011 20:04, Thomas Martitz a écrit :
> > Am 22.02.2011 19:36, schrieb Colomban Wendling:
> >
> >>> So my 1st suggestion is to remove all plugins which do have known
> >>> issues and don't compile with some -W-flags (needs to
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 20:04:17 +0100
Thomas Martitz wrote:
> Am 22.02.2011 19:36, schrieb Colomban Wendling:
>
> >> So my 1st suggestion is to remove all plugins which do have known
> >> issues and don't compile with some -W-flags (needs to be defined)
> >> from common build until these are fixed.
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 20:07:44 +0100
Thomas Martitz wrote:
> Hit enter too early :)
>
> Am 22.02.2011 19:36, schrieb Colomban Wendling:
>
> > Finally, I don't point my finger to anybody neither, but I know
> > some of the developers aren't experienced C developers. They then
> > probably cannot r
301 - 400 of 628 matches
Mail list logo
