Re: [Geany-devel] GtkBuilder is in!

2011-12-18 Thread Enrico Tröger
On Sat, 10 Dec 2011 16:21:22 -0800, Matthew wrote: Hi, I (finally) merged the gtkbuilder branch into master. I expect there to be at least a few bugs, but it's been working quite well for some time now. Please test and report any issues. I noticed one little weird thing: after starting Geany

Re: [Geany-devel] GtkBuilder is in!

2011-12-18 Thread Matthew Brush
On 12/18/2011 08:29 AM, Enrico Tröger wrote: On Sat, 10 Dec 2011 16:21:22 -0800, Matthew wrote: Hi, I (finally) merged the gtkbuilder branch into master. I expect there to be at least a few bugs, but it's been working quite well for some time now. Please test and report any issues. I

Re: [Geany-devel] GtkBuilder is in!

2011-12-18 Thread Matthew Brush
On 12/18/2011 08:29 AM, Enrico Tröger wrote: On Sat, 10 Dec 2011 16:21:22 -0800, Matthew wrote: Hi, I (finally) merged the gtkbuilder branch into master. I expect there to be at least a few bugs, but it's been working quite well for some time now. Please test and report any issues. I

Re: [Geany-devel] GtkBuilder is in!

2011-12-13 Thread Matthew Brush
On 12/12/2011 10:14 PM, Frank Lanitz wrote: Am 11.12.2011 01:21, schrieb Matthew Brush: - more testing on win32 Current nightly build of 12/12/11 did not start do to missing symbol on my box. A screenshot from my German Windows 7: http://frank.uvena.de/tmp/geany_error.png Its telling:

Re: [Geany-devel] GtkBuilder is in!

2011-12-12 Thread Frank Lanitz
Am 11.12.2011 01:21, schrieb Matthew Brush: - more testing on win32 Current nightly build of 12/12/11 did not start do to missing symbol on my box. A screenshot from my German Windows 7: http://frank.uvena.de/tmp/geany_error.png Its telling: g_malloc0_n wasn't found inside libglib-2.0-0.dll.

Re: [Geany-devel] GtkBuilder is in!

2011-12-12 Thread Matthew Brush
On 12/12/2011 10:14 PM, Frank Lanitz wrote: Am 11.12.2011 01:21, schrieb Matthew Brush: - more testing on win32 Current nightly build of 12/12/11 did not start do to missing symbol on my box. A screenshot from my German Windows 7: http://frank.uvena.de/tmp/geany_error.png Its telling:

Re: [Geany-devel] GtkBuilder is in!

2011-12-12 Thread Frank Lanitz
Am 13.12.2011 07:22, schrieb Matthew Brush: On 12/12/2011 10:14 PM, Frank Lanitz wrote: Am 11.12.2011 01:21, schrieb Matthew Brush: - more testing on win32 Current nightly build of 12/12/11 did not start do to missing symbol on my box. A screenshot from my German Windows 7:

Re: [Geany-devel] GtkBuilder is in!

2011-12-12 Thread Matthew Brush
On 12/12/2011 10:27 PM, Frank Lanitz wrote: Am 13.12.2011 07:22, schrieb Matthew Brush: On 12/12/2011 10:14 PM, Frank Lanitz wrote: Am 11.12.2011 01:21, schrieb Matthew Brush: - more testing on win32 Current nightly build of 12/12/11 did not start do to missing symbol on my box. A

Re: [Geany-devel] gtkbuilder branch and ui_lookup_widget functions

2011-10-31 Thread Nick Treleaven
On 19/10/2011 08:47, Matthew Brush wrote: On 11-10-17 05:22 AM, Nick Treleaven wrote: Hi Matthew, I'm a bit concerned about the changed ui_lookup_widget (and hookup) functions - these are in the plugin API and can be used independently from Glade. (plugin) API function behaviour should not

Re: [Geany-devel] gtkbuilder branch and ui_lookup_widget functions

2011-10-19 Thread Matthew Brush
On 11-10-17 05:22 AM, Nick Treleaven wrote: Hi Matthew, I'm a bit concerned about the changed ui_lookup_widget (and hookup) functions - these are in the plugin API and can be used independently from Glade. (plugin) API function behaviour should not normally change, but it seems the owner

Re: [Geany-devel] gtkbuilder branch and ui_lookup_widget functions

2011-10-18 Thread Matthew Brush
On 11-10-18 09:05 AM, Nick Treleaven wrote: On 18/10/2011 00:09, Matthew Brush wrote: I didn't want to break all the existing code in core and plugins that were using ui_lookup_widget/ui_hookup_widget() functions, so I dropped the (now) pointless first parameter. There's no need to associate

Re: [Geany-devel] gtkbuilder branch and ui_lookup_widget functions

2011-10-18 Thread Matthew Brush
On 11-10-18 01:33 PM, Matthew Brush wrote: Not really (I'm kinda stupid remember :) I think I'm confused about how it used to work and you're confused about how it works now :) I think I see what you're talking about, ui_hookup_widget() is attaching the widget to the owner Gobject's

[Geany-devel] gtkbuilder branch and ui_lookup_widget functions

2011-10-17 Thread Nick Treleaven
Hi Matthew, I'm a bit concerned about the changed ui_lookup_widget (and hookup) functions - these are in the plugin API and can be used independently from Glade. (plugin) API function behaviour should not normally change, but it seems the owner parameter is now ignored. If we are caching

Re: [Geany-devel] gtkbuilder branch and ui_lookup_widget functions

2011-10-17 Thread Matthew Brush
On 11-10-17 05:22 AM, Nick Treleaven wrote: Hi Matthew, I'm a bit concerned about the changed ui_lookup_widget (and hookup) functions - these are in the plugin API and can be used independently from Glade. (plugin) API function behaviour should not normally change, but it seems the owner

Re: [Geany-devel] gtkbuilder branch and ui_lookup_widget functions

2011-10-17 Thread Matthew Brush
On 11-10-17 04:09 PM, Matthew Brush wrote: On 11-10-17 05:22 AM, Nick Treleaven wrote: Hi Matthew, I'm a bit concerned about the changed ui_lookup_widget (and hookup) functions - these are in the plugin API and can be used independently from Glade. (plugin) API function behaviour should not