On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 19:49, Dimitar Zhekov wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Jul 2010 15:14:04 +0200
> Jiří Techet wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 21:11, Dimitar Zhekov
>> wrote:
>> > On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 13:21:03 +0200
>> >
>> > The global gproject pattern
>> > settings should _only_ be used to classi
On Sat, 17 Jul 2010 13:11:22 +0200
Thomas Martitz wrote:
> I quote like the current implementation and find Dimitar's suggestion
> confusing as well (I'm not sure I completely understood it even after
> reading the whole thread).
You enter a single list of patterns.
gproject searches for thes
I quote like the current implementation and find Dimitar's suggestion
confusing as well (I'm not sure I completely understood it even after
reading the whole thread).
The current implementation however seems straight forward and intuitive
to me.
Best regards.
On Fri, 16 Jul 2010 15:14:04 +0200
Jiří Techet wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 21:11, Dimitar Zhekov
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 13:21:03 +0200
> >
> > The global gproject pattern
> > settings should _only_ be used to classify what files are source and
> > what are header, since gproject
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 21:11, Dimitar Zhekov wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 13:21:03 +0200
> Jiří Techet wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 15:19, Dimitar Zhekov
>> wrote:
>> > On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 23:36:06 +0200
>> >
>> > Why have per-project source / header list, instead of global? No
>> > matt
On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 13:21:03 +0200
Jiří Techet wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 15:19, Dimitar Zhekov
> wrote:
> > On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 23:36:06 +0200
> >
> > Why have per-project source / header list, instead of global? No
> > matter the project, it's quite unlikely that a .c file will ever
> >
On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 22:53:17 +0200
Jiří Techet wrote:
> > Can you send the patches by email please - my git-fu is not yet good
> > enough (slowly improving though).
>
> OK, will do (maybe I'll wait for a while to collect everyone else's
> comments and possibly modify the patches).
Suits me :)
>
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 15:19, Dimitar Zhekov wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 23:36:06 +0200
> Jiří Techet wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 19:49, Dimitar Zhekov
>> wrote:
>> > On Sun, 4 Jul 2010 00:54:17 +0200
>> >
>> > I haven't tested, so correct me if I'm wrong, but it looks like it'll
>> > c
On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 23:36:06 +0200
Jiří Techet wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 19:49, Dimitar Zhekov wrote:
> > On Sun, 4 Jul 2010 00:54:17 +0200
> >
> > I haven't tested, so correct me if I'm wrong, but it looks like it'll
> > convert even paths outside the project directory, resulting in names
>> Totally agree, Geany doesn't (yet) support plugins integrating
>> themselves fully into Geany, but its something that needs thinking
>> about as a general capability to allow a more seamless user
>> experience, maybe we can look at how tools like Firefox do it.
>>
>> The problem with the current
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 03:37, Lex Trotman wrote:
> Hi Jiri
>
>
Remove the "set" button from the project properties dialog
Unless I miss something the button just adds %d to the corresponding
fields, but this is already the default settings so I don't see any
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 19:49, Dimitar Zhekov wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Jul 2010 00:54:17 +0200
> Jiří Techet wrote:
>
>> Hi everybody,
>
> Hi. I finally had the time to read the long list of suggested gproject
> changes and the discussion on them.
>
>> Rewrite tab switching queue
>
> About time.
>
>
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 13:57, Nick Treleaven
wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Jul 2010 23:59:04 +0200
> Jiří Techet wrote:
>
>> Hi Nick,
>>
>> thanks for looking at the patches. Let me know if I should re-send
>> them by email or modify them in some way.
>
> Can you send the patches by email please - my git-fu
On Sun, 4 Jul 2010 00:54:17 +0200
Jiří Techet wrote:
> Hi everybody,
Hi. I finally had the time to read the long list of suggested gproject
changes and the discussion on them.
> Rewrite tab switching queue
About time.
> Remove the "set" button from the project properties dialog
All h
On Thu, 8 Jul 2010 23:59:04 +0200
Jiří Techet wrote:
> Hi Nick,
>
> thanks for looking at the patches. Let me know if I should re-send
> them by email or modify them in some way.
Can you send the patches by email please - my git-fu is not yet good
enough (slowly improving though).
> > I'll try
Hi Jiri
>>> Remove the "set" button from the project properties dialog
>>>
>>> Unless I miss something the button just adds %d to the corresponding
>>> fields, but this is already the default settings so I don't see any
>>> point of doing it.
>>
>> I think so too.
>
> I was wrong
Hi Nick,
thanks for looking at the patches. Let me know if I should re-send
them by email or modify them in some way.
Further comments below.
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 18:23, Nick Treleaven
wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Jul 2010 00:54:17 +0200
> Jiří Techet wrote:
>
>> This time I did my best to integrate t
On Sun, 4 Jul 2010 00:54:17 +0200
Jiří Techet wrote:
> This time I did my best to integrate the plugin to geany as well as
> possible so there are more patches for geany itself than before. Apart
> from patches needed for gproject there are several more patches that
> fix some bugs in geany or ar
Hi everybody,
here's my second attempt to create a project management plugin for big projects:
http://gitorious.org/gproject/gproject
and here's a screenshot for those who are scared to compile and install it ;-) :
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/2554438/gproject.png
The main change since the first ve
19 matches
Mail list logo
