Le 22/01/2011 11:54, Enrico Tröger a écrit :
> On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 09:48:26 +0100, Frank Lanitz wrote:
>> On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 21:09:54 +0100
>> Enrico Tröger wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 21:25:54 +0100, Frank wrote:
>>>
>>> >On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 20:13:03 +0100
>>> >Enrico Tröger wrote:
>>> >
On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 11:54:02 +0100, Enrico Tröger wrote:
On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 09:48:26 +0100, Frank Lanitz wrote:
On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 21:09:54 +0100
Enrico Tröger wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 21:25:54 +0100, Frank wrote:
>On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 20:13:03 +0100
>Enrico Tröger wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 19
On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 09:48:26 +0100, Frank Lanitz wrote:
On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 21:09:54 +0100
Enrico Tröger wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 21:25:54 +0100, Frank wrote:
>On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 20:13:03 +0100
>Enrico Tröger wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 19:26:02 +0100, Colomban wrote:
>>
>> >Le 19/01/
On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 21:09:54 +0100
Enrico Tröger wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 21:25:54 +0100, Frank wrote:
>
> >On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 20:13:03 +0100
> >Enrico Tröger wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 19:26:02 +0100, Colomban wrote:
> >>
> >> >Le 19/01/2011 18:45, Dimitar Zhekov a écrit :
> >>
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 21:25:54 +0100, Frank wrote:
>On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 20:13:03 +0100
>Enrico Tröger wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 19:26:02 +0100, Colomban wrote:
>>
>> >Le 19/01/2011 18:45, Dimitar Zhekov a écrit :
>> >> On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 23:13:51 +0100
>> >> Enrico Tröger wrote:
>> >>
>>
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 20:13:03 +0100
Enrico Tröger wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 19:26:02 +0100, Colomban wrote:
>
> >Le 19/01/2011 18:45, Dimitar Zhekov a écrit :
> >> On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 23:13:51 +0100
> >> Enrico Tröger wrote:
> >>
> >>> In fact, I propose to do exactly this: all plugins of th
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 19:26:02 +0100, Colomban wrote:
>Le 19/01/2011 18:45, Dimitar Zhekov a écrit :
>> On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 23:13:51 +0100
>> Enrico Tröger wrote:
>>
>>> In fact, I propose to do exactly this: all plugins of the combined
>>> geany-plugins releases should have the version of the gea
Le 19/01/2011 18:45, Dimitar Zhekov a écrit :
> On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 23:13:51 +0100
> Enrico Tröger wrote:
>
>> In fact, I propose to do exactly this: all plugins of the combined
>> geany-plugins releases should have the version of the geany-plugins
>> release itself. Everything else would just ca
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 23:13:51 +0100
Enrico Tröger wrote:
> In fact, I propose to do exactly this: all plugins of the combined
> geany-plugins releases should have the version of the geany-plugins
> release itself. Everything else would just cause confusion, IMO.
So we are going to have my_plugin
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 22:57:48 +0100, Dominic wrote:
>Hi together, in special plugin developers ;)
>
>We currently are in the situation, that a user just sees the
>Geany-Plugins version when reporting bugs [1] but in the plugin manager
>in Geany just sees the version of the plugin itself. This might
Hi together, in special plugin developers ;)
We currently are in the situation, that a user just sees the
Geany-Plugins version when reporting bugs [1] but in the plugin manager
in Geany just sees the version of the plugin itself. This might be
confusing when the user doesn't remember which versio
11 matches
Mail list logo