On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 08:19:44 +1000
Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16 June 2010 04:12, Dimitar Zhekov dimitar.zhe...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmmm... Now that I think of it, how is a plugin supposed to save it's
settings in a project file when closing a project
connect to the
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 08:46:42 +0400
Eugene Arshinov earshi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, 5 Jun 2010 12:10:01 +0300%
Dimitar Zhekov dimitar.zhe...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
- Limit Project - Properties to saving the preferences only, and
limit project_close() to saving the file list only.
Hi,
- Limit Project - Properties to saving the preferences only, and
limit project_close() to saving the file list only.
Here it is, combined with the other save-* patches. BTW, when creating
a new project, it's immediately saved, both the settings and the file
list. So to avoid function
On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 21:55:04 +0300%
Dimitar Zhekov dimitar.zhe...@gmail.com wrote:
Most of the above are already available as patches. What remains:
- Warnings (questions?) on Edit - Preferences, Project - Properties
and Build - Set build commands.
- Limit Project - Properties to saving
Sorry, forgot to answer this in the afternoon.
On Thu, 3 Jun 2010
16:11:03 +1000% Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 June 2010 01:08, Eugene Arshinov earshi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 18:10:26 +1000%
Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2 June 2010 17:19, Eugene
On 3 June 2010 01:08, Eugene Arshinov earshi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 18:10:26 +1000%
Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2 June 2010 17:19, Eugene Arshinov earshi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 12:14:48 +1000%
Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
On 3 June 2010 04:55, Dimitar Zhekov dimitar.zhe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 12:14:48 +1000
Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote:
(This is an answer to Eugene too)
BTW changing filetype files is not that rare, every time you add an
option to your compile command you change one.
On Thu, 3 Jun 2010 16:38:57 +1000
Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote:
How would a Geany with your sm and whatever patches you choose to
apply behave against the (now) 7 points? The reason I'm asking is
that I've lost track of exactly what patches were proposed and their
effects and I think
On 4 June 2010 02:56, Dimitar Zhekov dimitar.zhe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 3 Jun 2010 16:38:57 +1000
Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote:
How would a Geany with your sm and whatever patches you choose to
apply behave against the (now) 7 points? The reason I'm asking is
that I've lost track
On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 12:14:48 +1000%
Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
Should they be combined? We never discussed such thing for 2+
instances, not even for 2+ main instances. Merging recent makes
sense, indeed, but adding files to be open on the next run of
Geany, or the next
On 2 June 2010 17:19, Eugene Arshinov earshi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 12:14:48 +1000%
Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
Should they be combined? We never discussed such thing for 2+
instances, not even for 2+ main instances. Merging recent makes
sense, indeed, but
On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 18:10:26 +1000%
Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2 June 2010 17:19, Eugene Arshinov earshi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 12:14:48 +1000%
Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
Should they be combined? We never discussed such thing for 2+
On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 12:14:48 +1000
Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote:
(This is an answer to Eugene too)
BTW changing filetype files is not that rare, every time you add an
option to your compile command you change one. Me, I add/remove -g
quite often :)
Yet the race is not that often -
On Mon, 31 May 2010 13:35:26 +0400
Eugene Arshinov earshi...@gmail.com wrote:
Just to mention, I ported to my SM branch the patches posted earlier in
this thread.
Also, I've changed the code to write changed recent files and projects
lists to geany.conf as soon as possible instead of
On Tue, 1 Jun 2010 19:55:27 +0300%
Dimitar Zhekov dimitar.zhe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 31 May 2010 13:35:26 +0400
Eugene Arshinov earshi...@gmail.com wrote:
Just to mention, I ported to my SM branch the patches posted
earlier in this thread.
Also, I've changed the code to write
On Tue, 1 Jun 2010 21:15:09 +0400
Eugene Arshinov earshi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 1 Jun 2010 19:55:27 +0300%
Dimitar Zhekov dimitar.zhe...@gmail.com wrote:
I wanted to test that, but the sm-4977 works quite amazing on my
system: running geany closes the entire session [...]
It is
snip
Should they be combined? We never discussed such thing for 2+
instances, not even for 2+ main instances. Merging recent makes sense,
indeed, but adding files to be open on the next run of Geany, or the
next time a project is open?..
Just for clarity, in the question I meant several
On 24 May 2010 18:18, Dimitar Zhekov hams...@mbox.contact.bg wrote:
On Mon, 24 May 2010 14:38:53 +1000
Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote:
And I just thought of another one, filetypes files, see
filetypes_save_commands() called from main_quit() so there can be a
race here too I think.
On Mon, 24 May 2010 20:32:33 +1000
Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote:
On 24 May 2010 18:18, Dimitar Zhekov hams...@mbox.contact.bg wrote:
If we want the filetype save to be consistent with Edit - Preferences
and Project - Properties, I think the commands should be saved on
Build - Set
On Sun, 23 May 2010 08:04:33 +1000
Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote:
You can get this behaviour by setting the hidden preference
use_safe_file_saving, in that case utils_write_file uses
g_file_set_contents which does _exactly_ what you describe, problem
is it changes owners and permissions
On 24 May 2010 01:04, Dimitar Zhekov hams...@mbox.contact.bg wrote:
On Sun, 23 May 2010 08:04:33 +1000
Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote:
You can get this behaviour by setting the hidden preference
use_safe_file_saving, in that case utils_write_file uses
g_file_set_contents which does
On Sat, 22 May 2010 12:55:40 +1000
Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
Isn't the race (as in broken file because 2+ instances write it at
once) only a problem of the original SM implementation? I mean, a user
can't close two projects or two Geany-s _that_ fast?..
No, but logout
On 22 May 2010 19:05, Dimitar Zhekov hams...@mbox.contact.bg wrote:
On Sat, 22 May 2010 12:55:40 +1000
Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
Isn't the race (as in broken file because 2+ instances write it at
once) only a problem of the original SM implementation? I mean, a user
On Sat, 22 May 2010 21:15:59 +1000
Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote:
Speaking of NFS (I read the patch) O_EXCL is problematic [...]
Thats correct, note I used g_open which seems to say that it works under
windows as well. [...] the only potential problem is that it can be
disabled by
On Fri, 21 May 2010 16:53:56 +1000
Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21 May 2010 15:13, Eugene Arshinov earshi...@gmail.com wrote:
But now there is a suggestion from Dimitar to also support changing
preferences in secondary instances. The last solution I wrote in the
large thread
On Fri, 21 May 2010 14:34:36 +1000%
Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I've created this thread separate from Eugene's and Ditmar's session
management threads because my concern is mostly about other parts of
Geany and I don't want to be seen as criticising either of them as it
26 matches
Mail list logo
