On 17/01/2012 20:36, Lex Trotman wrote:
I think if all is needed is to copy SciLexer.h and the new lexer file, plus
minor makefile changes, then a patch should be acceptable without upgrading
Scintilla. We've done this in the past.
Hi Nick,
How does this work without a filetype to support
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 3:46 AM, Nick Treleaven
nick.trelea...@btinternet.com wrote:
On 17/01/2012 20:36, Lex Trotman wrote:
I think if all is needed is to copy SciLexer.h and the new lexer file,
plus
minor makefile changes, then a patch should be acceptable without
upgrading
G'day,
I've hacked up some syntax highlighting support for SCSS[1] in a fork on
github[2] and Neil at the Scintilla project has accepted it[3]
So, how do I get this into Geany now? Obviously the Scintilla repo is
ahead of the Geany version, however what I have in my Geany fork is
compatible with
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 8:41 PM, Ross McKay ro...@zeta.org.au wrote:
G'day,
I've hacked up some syntax highlighting support for SCSS[1] in a fork on
github[2] and Neil at the Scintilla project has accepted it[3]
So, how do I get this into Geany now? Obviously the Scintilla repo is
ahead of
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 12:46 AM, Nick Treleaven
nick.trelea...@btinternet.com wrote:
On 17/01/2012 09:59, Lex Trotman wrote:
Geany prefers to use an unmodified Scintilla from that project.
Upgrading Scintilla is not a minor task involving as it does checking
and verification that all Geany
Lex Trotman wrote:
Geany prefers to use an unmodified Scintilla from that project.
Upgrading Scintilla is not a minor task involving as it does checking
and verification that all Geany settings in all filetypes map
correctly to all Scintilla styles and that all changes have been
handled
Nick Treleaven wrote:
I think if all is needed is to copy SciLexer.h and the new lexer file,
plus minor makefile changes, then a patch should be acceptable without
upgrading Scintilla. We've done this in the past.
I've got it working in Geany now. 11 changed files with 277 additions
and 25
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Ross McKay ro...@zeta.org.au wrote:
Lex Trotman wrote:
Geany prefers to use an unmodified Scintilla from that project.
Upgrading Scintilla is not a minor task involving as it does checking
and verification that all Geany settings in all filetypes map
correctly to
Lex Trotman wrote:
@Ross,
Do you have some SCSS examples for testing?
See attached, acid.css is what Neil Hodgson sent me for testing CSS, and
example.scss has SCSS code including the acid tests modified to show off
some SCSS features (basically, nesting, the nested parent operator,
mixins,
On 01/17/2012 01:54 PM, Lex Trotman wrote:
[...]
In general I'd say it could be added since a complete pull request is
available.
Pardon the serial post :)
@Ross,
Do you have some SCSS examples for testing?
@All Devs,
Should we make a section on the wiki for code fragments in each
G'day,
I've hacked up some syntax highlighting support for SCSS[1] in a fork on
github[2] if anyone wants to play with it. It's mostly working, although
it still has a small bug with nesting and doesn't yet support nested
properties (like: font: { weight: bold; size: 1em; })
Once I fix the
That nesting bug is fixed now. I'm leaving the nested properties alone
as it isn't used here and it looks too hard for my addled brain to
deal with today.
--
Ross McKay, Toronto, NSW Australia
Yeah, you just take your pill, and everything will be alright
- Everclear
12 matches
Mail list logo
